An analysis of polymer type and chain length for use as a biological composite graft extender in impaction bone grafting: A mechanical and biocompatibility study † ‡
Edward Tayton
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSherif Fahmy
School of Chemistry, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorMatthew Purcell
School of Chemistry, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorAlexander Aarvold
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorJames O. Smith
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSpandan Kalra
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorAdam Briscoe
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorStuart Lanham
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSteven Howdle
School of Chemistry, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorKevin Shakesheff
School of Pharmacy, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorDouglas G. Dunlop
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Richard O. C. Oreffo
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Bone and Joint Research Group, Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton. SO16 6YDSearch for more papers by this authorEdward Tayton
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSherif Fahmy
School of Chemistry, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorMatthew Purcell
School of Chemistry, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorAlexander Aarvold
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorJames O. Smith
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSpandan Kalra
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorAdam Briscoe
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorStuart Lanham
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorSteven Howdle
School of Chemistry, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorKevin Shakesheff
School of Pharmacy, University Park, The University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorDouglas G. Dunlop
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Richard O. C. Oreffo
Bone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Bone and Joint Research Group, Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton. SO16 6YDSearch for more papers by this authorHow to cite this article: Tayton E, Fahmy S, Purcell M, Aarvold A, Smith JO, Kalra S, Briscoe A, Lanham S, Howdle S, Shakesheff K, Dunlop DG, Oreffo ROC. 2012. An analysis of polymer type and chain length for use as a biological composite graft extender in impaction bone grafting: A mechanical and biocompatibility study. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2012:100A:3211–3219.
This work was undertaken as a collaboration between the University of Southampton and University of Nottingham as part of an MRC funded project.
Abstract
Impaction bone grafting (IBG) with human allograft remains the preferred approach for replacement of lost bone stock during revision hip surgery. Associated problems include cost, disease transmission, and stem subsidence. Synthetic grafts are therefore appealing, and ideally display similar mechanical characteristics as allograft, but with enhanced ability to form de novo bone. High and low molecular weight forms of three different polymers [poly(DL-lactide) (PDLLA), poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PDLLGA), and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)] were milled, impacted into discs, and then examined in a shear testing rig, in comparison to allograft. In addition, skeletal stem cells (SSCs) were combined with each of the milled polymers, followed by impaction and examination for cell viability and number, via fluorostaining and biochemical assays. The shear strengths of high/low mwt PDLLA, and high/low mwt PDLLGA were significantly higher than allograft (p < 0.01). High/low mwt PCL had significantly lower shear strengths (p < 0.01). WST-1 assay and fluorstaining indicated significantly increased cell viability on high mwt PDLLA and high mwt PDLLGA over allograft (p < 0.05). Mechanical and biochemical analysis indicated improved properties of high mwt PDLLA and high mwt PDLLGA over allograft. This study indicates the potential of these polymers for use as substitute human allograft, creating a living composition with SSC for application in IBG. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 100A:3211–3219, 2012.
REFERENCES
- 1 Quarto R, Mastrogiacomo M, Cancedda R, Kutepov SM, Mukhachev V, Lavroukov A, Kon E, Marcacci M. Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 385–386.
- 2 Johnson EE, Urist MR, Finerman GA. Resistant nonunions and partial or complete segmental defects of long bones. Treatment with implants of a composite of human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and autolyzed, antigen-extracted, allogeneic (AAA) bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992: 229–237.
- 3 Morishita T, Honoki K, Ohgushi H, Kotobuki N, Matsushima A, Takakura Y. Tissue engineering approach to the treatment of bone tumors: Three cases of cultured bone grafts derived from patients' mesenchymal stem cells. Artif Organs 2006; 30: 115–118.
- 4 Ueda M, Yamada Y, Ozawa R, Okazaki Y. Clinical case reports of injectable tissue-engineered bone for alveolar augmentation with simultaneous implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 129–137.
- 5National Joint Registry for England and Wales, 8th Annual Report; 2010.
- 6 Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 809–817.
- 7 Schreurs BW, Bolder SB, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 492–497.
- 8 Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 535–540.
- 9 Bolland BJ, Partridge K, Tilley S, New AM, Dunlop DG, Oreffo RO. Biological and mechanical enhancement of impacted allograft seeded with human bone marrow stromal cells: Potential clinical role in impaction bone grafting. Regen Med 2006; 1: 457–467.
- 10 Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SP, Usmani AS, Pankaj P, Howie CR. Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft: The effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 639–646.
- 11 Bolland BJ, New AM, Madabhushi SP, Oreffo RO, Dunlop DG. Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 686–692.
- 12 Galea G, Kopman D, Graham BJ. Supply and demand of bone allograft for revision hip surgery in Scotland. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 595–599.
- 13 Huo MH, Friedlaender GE, Salvati EA. Bone graft and total hip arthroplasty. A review. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7: 109–120.
- 14 Simonds RJ, Holmberg SD, Hurwitz RL, Coleman TR, Bottenfield S, Conley LJ, Kohlenberg SH, Castro KG, Dahan BA, Schable CA. Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from a seronegative organ and tissue donor. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 726–732.
- 15 Blom AW, Cunningham JL, Hughes G, Lawes TJ, Smith N, Blunn G, Learmonth ID, Goodship AE. The compatibility of ceramic bone graft substitutes as allograft extenders for use in impaction grafting of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 421–425.
- 16 Blom AW, Wylde V, Livesey C, Whitehouse MR, Eastaugh-Waring S, Bannister GC, Learmonth ID. Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 150–154.
- 17 McNamara I, Deshpande S, Porteous M. Impaction grafting of the acetabulum with a mixture of frozen, ground irradiated bone graft and porous synthetic bone substitute (Apapore 60). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92: 617–623.
- 18 Blom AW, Grimm B, Miles AW, Cunningham JL, Learmonth ID. Subsidence in impaction grafting: The effect of adding a ceramic bone graft extender to bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2002; 216: 265–270.
- 19 Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 2529–2543.
- 20 Jones AMH, Foong TS, New AM, Bolland BJ, Pound JC, Dunlop DG, Oreffo RO. The effect of skeletal stem cells, hydroxyapatite coated stem cells and collagen coated allograft on the biomechanical properties of impacted bone graft. Eur Cell Mater 2009; 18, 26.
- 21 Brewster NT, Gillespie WJ, Howie CR, Madabhushi SP, Usmani AS, Fairbairn DR. Mechanical considerations in impaction bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 118–124.
- 22 Bergman G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001; 34: 859–8871.
- 23 van Haaren EH, Smit TH, Phipps K, Wuisman PI, Blunn G, Heyligers IC Tricalcium-phosphate and hydroxyapatite bone-graft extender for use in impaction grafting revision surgery. An in vitro study on human femora. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 267–271.
- 24 Oakley J, Kuiper JH. Factors affecting the cohesion of impaction bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 828–831.
- 25 Korda M, Blunn G, Phipps K, Rust P, Di Silvio L, Coathup M, Goodship A, Hua J. Can mesenchymal stem cells survive under normal impaction force in revision total hip replacements? Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 625–630.
- 26 Korda M, Blunn G, Goodship A, Hua J. Use of mesenchymal stem cells to enhance bone formation around revision hip replacements. J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 880–885.
- 27 Tilley S, Bolland BJ, Partridge K, New AM, Latham JM, Dunlop DG, Oreffo RO. Taking tissue-engineering principles into theater: Augmentation of impacted allograft with human bone marrow stromal cells. Regen Med 2006; 1: 685–692.
- 28 Aarvold A, Smith JO, Tayton E R, Briscoe A, Lanham S, Dawson JI, Oreffo ROC, Dunlop DG. Biological augmentation of impaction bone grafting: Retrieval analysis of human tissue engineered specimens. British Hip Society Torquay; 2011.
- 29 Bolland BJ, Kanczler JM, Ginty PJ, Howdle SM, Shakesheff KM, Dunlop DG, Oreffo RO. The application of human bone marrow stromal cells and poly(DL-lactic acid) as a biological bone graft extender in impaction bone grafting. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3221–3227.
- 30 Khan F, Tare RS, Kanczler JM, Oreffo RO, Bradley M. Strategies for cell manipulation and skeletal tissue engineering using high-throughput polymer blend formulation and microarray techniques. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2216–2228.
- 31 Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR, Nam EK, Tsai DC, Thomas CH, Nuber GW, Glorieux FH, Travers R, Sprague SM. Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. Tissue Eng 1999; 5: 35–51.
- 32 Agrawal CM, Ray RB. Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 55: 141–150.
- 33 Hubbell JA. Materials as morphogenetic guides in tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003; 14: 551–58.
- 34 Marois Y, Sigot-Luizard MF, Guidoin R. Endothelial cell behavior on vascular prosthetic grafts: Effect of polymer chemistry, surface structure, and surface treatment. ASAIO J 1999; 45: 272–280.
- 35 Milleret V, Simona B, Neuenschwander P, Hall H. Tuning electrospinning parameters for production of 3D-fiber-fleeces with increased porosity for soft tissue engineering applications. Eur Cell Mater 2011; 21: 286–303.
- 36 Miot S, Woodfield T, Daniels AU, Suetterlin R, Peterschmitt I, Heberer M, van Blitterswijk CA, Riesle J, Martin I. Effects of scaffold composition and architecture on human nasal chondrocyte redifferentiation and cartilaginous matrix deposition. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2479–2489.
- 37 Bostman OM, Pihlajamaki HK. Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 371: 216–227.
- 38
Agrawal CM,
Athanasiou KA.
Technique to control pH in vicinity of biodegrading PLA-PGA implants.
J Biomed Mater Res
1997;
38:
105–114.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2<105::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-U CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 39
Khouw IM,
van Wachem PB,
de Leij LF,
van Luyn MJ.
Inhibition of the tissue reaction to a biodegradable biomaterial by monoclonal antibodies to IFN-gamma.
J Biomed Mater Res
1998;
41:
202–210.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199808)41:2<202::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-M CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar