Volume 95, Issue 8 pp. 1749-1763
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The how and the why of study choice processes in higher education: The role of parental involvement and the experience of having an authentic inner compass

B. Vermote

Corresponding Author

B. Vermote

Department of Developmental, Social, and Personality Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Correspondence B. Vermote, Department of Developmental, Social, and Personality Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
B. Soenens

B. Soenens

Department of Developmental, Social, and Personality Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
M. Vansteenkiste

M. Vansteenkiste

Department of Developmental, Social, and Personality Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
J. Coenye

J. Coenye

Department of Developmental, Social, and Personality Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
K. Verschueren

K. Verschueren

Department of School Psychology & Development in Context, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
W. Beyers

W. Beyers

Department of Developmental, Social, and Personality Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 September 2023
Citations: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Late adolescents differ in the degree to which they are thoroughly engaged in the study choice process and in the degree to which their choices are autonomous in nature. This study examined the unique and interactive roles of (a) parental involvement in the study choice process and (b) late adolescents' sense of having an authentic inner compass (AIC) in predicting their study choice decision-making.

Method

A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among 331 12th-grade adolescents from the Flemish part of Belgium (68.3% female; Mage = 18.04, SD = 0.48) in the spring of 2017 and 2018.

Results

Results of the latent sum and difference models revealed that late adolescents experiencing a stronger AIC and more need-supportive parental involvement showed more engagement in and autonomous regulation of the study choice process. In contrast, when experiencing more controlling parental involvement or uninvolvement, late adolescents showed more controlled regulation, with parental control also being linked to less commitment. Although mothers were perceived to be more involved than fathers, maternal and paternal involvement were equally strongly related to the study choice tasks.

Conclusion

Overall, late adolescents' sense of having an AIC and parental involvement were related independently to the outcomes, with sense of having an AIC yielding the strongest associations.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.