Novel genetic variants in KIF16B and NEDD4L in the endosome-related genes are associated with nonsmall cell lung cancer survival
Sen Yang
Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
S.Y. and D.T. contributed equally to this workSearch for more papers by this authorDongfang Tang
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
S.Y. and D.T. contributed equally to this workSearch for more papers by this authorYu C. Zhao
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorHongliang Liu
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorSheng Luo
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorThomas E. Stinchcombe
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorCarolyn Glass
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorLi Su
Department of Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Search for more papers by this authorSipeng Shen
Department of Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Search for more papers by this authorDavid C. Christiani
Department of Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Qiming Wang
Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Correspondence to: Qiming Wang, E-mail: [email protected]; or Qingyi Wei, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Qingyi Wei
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Correspondence to: Qiming Wang, E-mail: [email protected]; or Qingyi Wei, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSen Yang
Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
S.Y. and D.T. contributed equally to this workSearch for more papers by this authorDongfang Tang
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
S.Y. and D.T. contributed equally to this workSearch for more papers by this authorYu C. Zhao
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorHongliang Liu
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorSheng Luo
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorThomas E. Stinchcombe
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorCarolyn Glass
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Search for more papers by this authorLi Su
Department of Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Search for more papers by this authorSipeng Shen
Department of Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Search for more papers by this authorDavid C. Christiani
Department of Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Qiming Wang
Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Correspondence to: Qiming Wang, E-mail: [email protected]; or Qingyi Wei, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Qingyi Wei
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Correspondence to: Qiming Wang, E-mail: [email protected]; or Qingyi Wei, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The endosome is a membrane-bound organ inside most eukaryotic cells, playing an important role in adaptive immunity by delivering endocytosed antigens to both MHC class I and II pathways. Here, by analyzing genotyping data from two published genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we evaluated associations between genetic variants in the endosome-related gene-set and survival of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The discovery included 44,112 (3,478 genotyped and 40,634 imputed) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 220 genes in a singlelocus analysis for their associations with survival of 1,185 NSCLC patients from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. After validation of the 821 survival-associated significant SNPs in additional 984 NSCLC patients from the Harvard Lung Cancer Susceptibility Study, 14 SNPs remained significant. The final multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression modeling of the PLCO dataset identified three potentially functional and independent SNPs (i.e., KIF16B rs1555195 C>T, NEDD4L rs11660748 A>G and rs73440898 A>G) with an adjusted hazards ratio (HR) of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79–0.94, p = 0.0007), 1.31 (1.16–1.47, p = 6.0 × 10−5) and 1.27 (1.12–1.44, p = 0.0001) for overall survival (OS), respectively. Combined analysis of the adverse genotypes of these three SNPs revealed a trend in the genotype-survival association (ptrend < 0.0001 for OS and ptrend < 0.0001 for disease-specific survival). Furthermore, the survival-associated KIF16B rs1555195T allele was significantly associated with decreased mRNA expression levels of KIF16B in both lung tissues and blood cells. Therefore, genetic variants of the endosome-related genes may be biomarker for NSCLC survival, possibly through modulating the expression of corresponding genes.
Abstract
What's new?
Immunotherapy has become a key component of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, not all patients benefit from immunotherapy, and there is increasing need to predict immunotherapy response in order to improve treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. In the present investigation of genes involved in endosome-related pathways, which are suspected of serving important immune-guided anti-tumor functions, three variants, located in the genes KIF16B and NEDD4L, were associated with NSCLC survival. The survival-associated variant in KIF16B was specifically associated with reduced KIF16B mRNA expression levels in lung tissue and blood cells, identifying it as a potentially useful biomarker for NSCLC survival.
Open Research
Data availability
The datasets used for the analyses described in the present study were obtained from dbGaP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap) through dbGaP accession number phs000336.v1.p1 and phs000093.v2.p2.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
ijc32739-sup-0001-Tables.docxWord 2007 document , 54.1 KB |
Table S1. Comparison of the characteristics between the PLCO trial and HLCS study Table S2. List of 220 selected genes in the endosome-related gene-set Table S3. Associations of the first 10 principal components and overall survival of NSCLC in the PLCO trial Table S4. Stratified analyses for associations between the unfavorable genotypes and 10-year survival of NSCLC in the PLCO triala Table S5. Function prediction of the three SNPs and other SNPs in high LD (r2 > =0.8) |
ijc32739-sup-0001-Figures.docxWord 2007 document , 2.6 MB | Figure S1. The distribution of the imputation information score of the present study. Figure S2. Manhattan plot of associations between genotype data and overall survival of patients with NSCLC from the discovery and validation datasets in the PLCO trial and HLCS study, respectively. (a) The statistical values across the autosomes of associations between 44,112 SNPs and overall survival in PLCO are plotted as −log10 p values. (b) The statistical values across the autosomes of associations between 821 SNPs and overall survival in HLCS are plotted as −log10 p values. The blue horizontal line indicates p = 0.050 and the red line indicates BFDP = 0.80. Abbreviations: NSCLC, nonsmall cell lung cancer; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; PLCO, Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial; OS, overall survival; BFDP, Bayesian false discovery probability. Figure S3. Regional association plots for the three independent SNPs in the endosome pathway genes in the 1000 Genomes Project. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the region of 50kb up or downstream of (a) KIF16B rs1555195 C>T, (b) NEDD4L rs11660748 A>G and (c) NEDD4L rs73440898 A>G. Data points are colored according to the level of linkage disequilibrium of each pair of SNPs based on the hg19/1000 Genomes European population. The left-hand y-axis shows the association p-values of individual SNPs in the discovery dataset, which is plotted as −log10 (p) against chromosomal base-pair position. The right-hand y-axis shows the recombination rate estimated from HapMap Data Rel 22/phase II European population. Figure S4. Five-year NSCLC survival prediction of the combined three SNPs by ROC curve in the PLCO dataset. (a) Time-dependent AUC estimation based on age, sex, smoking status, histology, tumor stage, chemotherapy, surgery, principal component and the risk genotypes of the four genes. (b) Five-year NSCLC OS prediction by ROC curve, (c) five-year NSCLC DSS prediction by ROC curve. Abbreviations: NSCLC, nonsmall cell lung cancer; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphism; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC, area under the curve; PLCO, Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial; OS, overall survival; DSS, disease-specific survival; Figure S5. Correlations of rs1555195, rs11660748 and rs73440898 genotypes with their corresponding mRNA expression levels. The eQTL for KIF16B rs1555195 (a), NEDD4L rs11660748 ( b) and rs73440898 (c) in 373 Europeans from the 1000 Genomes Project. Abbreviation: eQTL, expression quantitative trait loci. Figure S6. Correlations of rs11660748 and rs73440898 genotypes with their corresponding mRNA expression levels. The eQTL for NEDD4L rs11660748 in normal lung tissue (a) and in whole blood; (b) NEDD4L rs73440898 in normal lung tissue; (c) and in whole blood; (d) in GTEx Project. Abbreviation: eQTL, expression quantitative trait loci. Figure S7. Expanded view of the ENCODE data for the rs1555195, rs11660748 and rs73440898. The H3K27Ac, H3K4Me1 and H3K4Me3 tracks show the genome-wide levels of enrichment of acetylation of lysine 27, the mono-methylation of lysine 4, and tri-methylation of lysine 4 of the H3 histone protein, as determined by the ChIP-seq assays. These levels are thought to be associated with the promoter and enhancer regions. DNase clusters track showed Dnase hypersensitivity areas. Tnx factor track show regions of transcription factor binding of DNA, as assayed by ChIP-seq experiments. Transcription shows target genes of transcription factors from transcription factor binding site profiles. Abbreviation: ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing. Figure S8. Differential mRNA expression analysis and overall survival analysis of the KIF16B gene in the TCGA database. (a) The expression levels of KIF16B were not different in the 109 paired NSCLC tissues; (b) Higher expression levels of KIF16B were found in the normal tissue of the 58 paired LUAD tissues, compared to the tumor tissue; and (c) lower expression levels of KIF16B were found in the normal tissue of the 51 paired LUSC, compared to the tumor tissues. Higher KIF16B expression was associated with a better overall survival; (d) in NSCLC; (e) in LUAD patients, while with a worse overall survival; and (f) in LUSC patients. Abbreviations: TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; NSCLC, nonsmall cell lung cancer; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma. Figure S9. Differential mRNA expression analysis and overall survival analysis of the NEDD4L gene in the TCGA database. Higher expression levels of NEDD4L were found (a) in the 109 paired NSCLC tissues; (b) in the 58 paired LUAD tissues; and (c) in the 51 paired LUSC tissues. Higher expression levels of NEDD4L was associated with a better overall survival in (d) NSCLC and (e) LUAD patients, while with a worse survival (f) in LUSC patients. Abbreviations: TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; NSCLC, nonsmall cell lung cancer; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 87–108.
- 2Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 7–34.
- 3Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4539–44.
- 4Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2016; 5: 288–300.
- 5Jia M, Zhu M, Zhou F, et al. Genetic variants of JNK and p38alpha pathways and risk of non-small cell lung cancer in an eastern Chinese population. Int J Cancer 2017; 140: 807–17.
- 6Zienolddiny S, Skaug V. Single nucleotide polymorphisms as susceptibility, prognostic, and therapeutic markers of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 2012; 3: 1–14.
- 7Stenzel-Bembenek A, Sagan D, Guz M, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in lung cancer patients and cisplatin treatment. Postepy Hig Med Dosw 2014; 68: 1361–73.
- 8Stoorvogel W, Strous GJ, Geuze HJ, et al. Late endosomes derive from early endosomes by maturation. Cell 1991; 65: 417–27.
- 9Heath WR, Carbone FR. Cross-presentation in viral immunity and self-tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol 2001; 1: 126–34.
- 10Liu Y, Zeng G. Cancer and innate immune system interactions: translational potentials for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother 2012; 35: 299–308.
- 11Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Immune surveillance: a balance between protumor and antitumor immunity. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2008; 18: 11–8.
- 12Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science 2011; 331: 1565–70.
- 13Ryu R, Ward KE. Atezolizumab for the first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): current status and future prospects. Front Oncol 2018; 8: 277.
- 14Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2040–51.
- 15Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2078–92.
- 16Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1823–33.
- 17Kobayashi KS, van den Elsen PJ. NLRC5: a key regulator of MHC class I-dependent immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12: 813–20.
- 18Hocking WG, Hu P, Oken MM, et al. Lung cancer screening in the randomized prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 722–31.
- 19Oken MM, Marcus PM, Hu P, et al. Baseline chest radiograph for lung cancer detection in the randomized prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 1832–9.
- 20Tryka KA, Hao L, Sturcke A, et al. NCBI's database of genotypes and phenotypes: dbGaP. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42: D975–9.
- 21Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, et al. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat Genet 2007; 39: 1181–6.
- 22Zhai R, Yu X, Wei Y, et al. Smoking and smoking cessation in relation to the development of co-existing non-small cell lung cancer with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Cancer 2014; 134: 961–70.
- 23Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, et al. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 1294–6.
- 24Wakefield J. A Bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 208–27.
- 25Chambless LE, Diao G. Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction. Stat Med 2006; 25: 3474–86.
- 26Lappalainen T, Sammeth M, Friedlander MR, et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature 2013; 501: 506–11.
- 27Consortium GT. Human genomics. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science 2015; 348: 648–60.
- 28Xu Z, Taylor JA. SNPinfo: integrating GWAS and candidate gene information into functional SNP selection for genetic association studies. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: W600–5.
- 29Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M, et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res 2012; 22: 1790–7.
- 30Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg v4: systematic mining of putative causal variants, cell types, regulators and target genes for human complex traits and disease. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44: D877–81.
- 31Gyorffy B, Surowiak P, Budczies J, et al. Online survival analysis software to assess the prognostic value of biomarkers using transcriptomic data in non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS One 2013; 8:e 82241.
- 32Wang Y, Liu H, Ready NE, et al. Genetic variants in ABCG1 are associated with survival of nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2016; 138: 2592–601.
- 33Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978; 6: 461–4.
- 34Relli V, Trerotola M, Guerra E, et al. Abandoning the notion of non-small cell lung cancer. Trends Mol Med 2019; 25: 585–94.
- 35Chang JT, Lee YM, Huang RS. The impact of the cancer genome atlas on lung cancer. Transl Res 2015; 166: 568–85.
- 36 Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature 2012; 489: 519–25.
- 37 Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2014; 511: 543–50.
- 38Rekhtman N, Paik PK, Arcila ME, et al. Clarifying the spectrum of driver oncogene mutations in biomarker-verified squamous carcinoma of lung: lack of EGFR/KRAS and presence of PIK3CA/AKT1 mutations. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 1167–76.
- 39Goldstein LS. Molecular motors: from one motor many tails to one motor many tales. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11: 477–82.
- 40Blatner NR, Wilson MI, Lei C, et al. The structural basis of novel endosome anchoring activity of KIF16B kinesin. EMBO J 2007; 26: 3709–19.
- 41Hoepfner S, Severin F, Cabezas A, et al. Modulation of receptor recycling and degradation by the endosomal kinesin KIF16B. Cell 2005; 121: 437–50.
- 42Singh M, Venugopal C, Tokar T, et al. Therapeutic targeting of the Premetastatic stage in human lung-to-brain metastasis. Cancer Res 2018; 78: 5124–34.
- 43Yang B, Kumar S. Nedd4 and Nedd4-2: closely related ubiquitin-protein ligases with distinct physiological functions. Cell Death Differ 2010; 17: 68–77.
- 44Rotin D, Kumar S. Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 398–409.
- 45Harvey KF, Kumar S. Nedd4-like proteins: an emerging family of ubiquitin-protein ligases implicated in diverse cellular functions. Trends Cell Biol 1999; 9: 166–9.
- 46Sakashita H, Inoue H, Akamine S, et al. Identification of the NEDD4L gene as a prognostic marker by integrated microarray analysis of copy number and gene expression profiling in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20(Suppl 3): S590–8.
- 47Qu MH, Han C, Srivastava AK, et al. miR-93 promotes TGF-beta-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through downregulation of NEDD4L in lung cancer cells. Tumour Biol 2016; 37: 5645–51.
- 48Wang X, Duan J, Fu W, et al. Decreased expression of NEDD4L contributes to NSCLC progression and metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019; 513: 398–404.
- 49Mellman I, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells: specialized and regulated antigen processing machines. Cell 2001; 106: 255–8.
- 50Joffre OP, Segura E, Savina A, et al. Cross-presentation by dendritic cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12: 557–69.