Volume 129, Issue 3 pp. 517-527
Mini Review

Looking ahead: A case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy

Patti E. Gravitt

Corresponding Author

Patti E. Gravitt

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

Tel.: 443-287-6179

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., E6148, Baltimore, MD 21205, USASearch for more papers by this author
Jerome L. Belinson

Jerome L. Belinson

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Search for more papers by this author
Jorge Salmeron

Jorge Salmeron

Instituto Mexicano de Seguro Social, Epidemiologic Investigation and Health Research Unit, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
Keerti V. Shah

Keerti V. Shah

W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 February 2011
Citations: 86

Abstract

Even in the era of highly effective human papillomavirus (HPV) prophylactic vaccines, substantial reduction in worldwide cervical cancer mortality will only be realized if effective early detection and treatment of the millions of women already infected and the millions who may not receive vaccination in the next decade can be broadly implemented through sustainable cervical cancer screening programs. Effective programs must meet three targets: (i) at least 70% of the targeted population should be screened at least once in a lifetime, (ii) screening assays and diagnostic tests must be reproducible and sufficiently sensitive and specific for the detection of high-grade precursor lesions (i.e., CIN2+), and (iii) effective treatment must be provided. We review the evidence that HPV DNA screening from swabs collected by the women in their home or village is sufficiently sound for consideration as a primary screening strategy in the developing world, with sensitivity and specificity for detection of CIN2+ as good or better than Pap smear cytology and VIA. A key feature of a self-collected HPV testing strategy (SC-HPV) is the move of the primary screening activities from the clinic to the community. Efforts to increase the affordability and availability of HPV DNA tests, community education and awareness, development of strong partnerships between community advocacy groups, health care centers and regional or local laboratories, and resource appropriate strategies to identify and treat screen-positive women should now be prioritized to ensure successful public health translation of the technologic advancements in cervical cancer prevention.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.