Volume 120, Issue 4 pp. 880-884
Epidemiology

Different types of postmenopausal hormone therapy and mammographic density in Norwegian women

Yngve Bremnes

Corresponding Author

Yngve Bremnes

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway

Fax: +47-77-64-48-31.

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, NorwaySearch for more papers by this author
Giske Ursin

Giske Ursin

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Nils Bjurstam

Nils Bjurstam

Department of Radiology, Center for Breast Imaging, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Eiliv Lund

Eiliv Lund

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Inger Torhild Gram

Inger Torhild Gram

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 December 2006
Citations: 21

Abstract

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. The HTs used in Scandinavia is associated with higher risk estimates than those used in most other countries. Mammographic density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, and possibly an intermediate marker for breast cancer. We decided to examine the relationship between use of different types of HT and mammographic density in Norwegian women. Altogether, 1,007 postmenopausal participants in the governmental mammographic screening program were asked about current and previous HT use. Mammograms were classified according to percent and absolute mammographic density. Overall, current users of HT had on average 3.6% higher mean percent mammographic density when compared with never users (p < 0.001). After adjustment for age at screening, number of children and BMI in a multivariate model, women using the continuous estradiol (E2) plus norethisterone acetate (NETA) combination had a mean percent mammographic density significantly higher than never users (6.1% absolute difference). Those using the continuous E2 plus NETA combination had an 4.8% (absolute difference) higher mean percent mammographic density after <5 years of use when compared with never users, while the corresponding number for ≥5 years of use was 7% (p-trend < 0.001). We found similar associations when absolute mammographic density was used as the outcome variable. In summary, our study shows a statistical significant positive dose–response association between current use of the continuous E2 plus NETA combination and both measures of mammographic density. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.