Telomere DNA content and allelic imbalance demonstrate field cancerization in histologically normal tissue adjacent to breast tumors
Christopher M. Heaphy
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarco Bisoffi
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorColleen A. Fordyce
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorChristina M. Haaland
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam C. Hines
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNancy E. Joste
Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeffrey K. Griffith
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Fax: +1-505-272-6587
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, MSC08 4670, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USASearch for more papers by this authorChristopher M. Heaphy
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarco Bisoffi
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorColleen A. Fordyce
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorChristina M. Haaland
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam C. Hines
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNancy E. Joste
Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeffrey K. Griffith
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Fax: +1-505-272-6587
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, MSC08 4670, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USASearch for more papers by this authorAbstract
Cancer arises from an accumulation of mutations that promote the selection of cells with progressively malignant phenotypes. Previous studies have shown that genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer cells, is a driving force in this process. In the present study, two markers of genomic instability, telomere DNA content and allelic imbalance, were examined in two independent cohorts of mammary carcinomas. Altered telomeres and unbalanced allelic loci were present in both tumors and surrounding histologically normal tissues at distances at least 1 cm from the visible tumor margins. Although the extent of these genetic changes decreases as a function of the distance from the visible tumor margin, unbalanced loci are conserved between the surrounding tissues and the tumors, implying cellular clonal evolution. Our results are in agreement with the concepts of “field cancerization” and “cancer field effect,” concepts that were previously introduced to describe areas within tissues consisting of histologically normal, yet genetically aberrant, cells that represent fertile grounds for tumorigenesis. The finding that genomic instability occurs in fields of histologically normal tissues surrounding the tumor is of clinical importance, as it has implications for the definition of appropriate tumor margins and the assessment of recurrence risk factors in the context of breast-sparing surgery. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
References
- 1 Gollin SM. Chromosomal instability. Curr Opin Oncol 2004; 16: 25–31.
- 2 Charames GS, Bapat B. Genomic instability and cancer. Curr Mol Med 2003; 3: 589–96.
- 3 Nojima H. G1 and S-phase checkpoints, chromosome instability, and cancer. Methods Mol Biol 2004; 280: 3–49.
- 4 Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998; 396: 643–9.
- 5 Desmaze C, Soria JC, Freulet-Marriere MA, Mathieu N, Sabatier L. Telomere-driven genomic instability in cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2003; 194: 173–82.
- 6 Callen E, Surralles J. Telomere dysfunction in genome instability syndromes. Mutat Res 2004; 567: 85–104.
- 7 Hackett JA, Feldser DM, Greider CW. Telomere dysfunction increases mutation rate and genomic instability. Cell 2001; 106: 275–86.
- 8 Moyzis RK, Buckingham JM, Cram LS, Dani M, Deaven LL, Jones MD, Meyne J, Ratliff RL, Wu JR. A highly conserved repetitive DNA sequence, (TTAGGG)n, present at the telomeres of human chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988; 85: 6622–6.
- 9 de Lange T. Protection of mammalian telomeres. Oncogene 2002; 21: 532–40.
- 10 Smogorzewska A, de Lange T. Regulation of telomerase by telomeric proteins. Ann Rev Biochem 2004; 73: 177–208.
- 11 Maser RS, DePinho RA. Telomeres and the DNA damage response: why the fox is guarding the henhouse. DNA Repair 2004; 3: 979–88.
- 12 Olovnikov AM. Principle of marginotomy in template synthesis of polynucleotides. Dokl Akad Nauk 1971; 201: 1496–9.
- 13 Smogorzewska A, van Steensel B, Bianchi A, Oelmann S, Schaefer MR, Schnapp G, de Lange T. Control of human telomere length by TRF1 and TRF2. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 1659–68.
- 14 Bohr VA, Anson RM. DNA damage, mutation and fine structure DNA repair in aging. Mutat Res 1995; 338: 25–34.
- 15 Neumann AA, Reddel RR. Telomere maintenance and cancer—look, no telomerase. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 879–84.
- 16 Reddel RR. Alternative lengthening of telomeres, telomerase, and cancer. Cancer Lett 2003; 194: 155–62.
- 17 Greider CW, Blackburn EH. Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in tetrahymena extracts. Cell 1985; 43: 405–13.
- 18 Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, Harley CB, West MD, Ho PL, Coviello GM, Wright WE, Weinrich SL, Shay JW. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 1994; 266: 2011–5.
- 19 Hastie N, Dempster M, Dunlop M, Thompson A, Green D, Alshire R. Telomere reduction in human colorectal carcinoma and with ageing. Nature 1990; 346: 866–8.
- 20 Furugori E, Hirayama R, Nakamura KI, Kammori M, Esaki Y, Takubo K. Telomere shortening in gastric carcinoma with aging despite telomerase activation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2000; 126: 481–5.
- 21 Mehle C, Ljungberg B, Roos G. Telomere shortening in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 236–41.
- 22 Albertson DG, Collins C, McCormick F, Gray JW. Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nat Genet 2003; 34: 369–76.
- 23 Ohyashiki JH, Sashida G, Tauchi T, Ohyashiki K. Telomeres and telomerase in hematologic neoplasia. Oncogene 2002; 21: 680–7.
- 24 Hirashima T, Komiya T, Nitta T, Takada Y, Kobayashi M, Masuda N, Matui K, Takada M, Kikui M, Yasumitu T, Ohno A, Nakagawa K, et al. Prognostic significance of telomeric repeat length alterations in pathological stage I–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2000; 20: 2181–7.
- 25 Hiyama E, Hiyama K, Yokoyama T, Ichikawa T, Matsuura Y. Length of telomeric repeats in neuroblastoma: correlation with prognosis and other biological characteristics. Jpn J Cancer Res 1992; 83: 159–64.
- 26 Donaldson L, Fordyce C, Gilliland F, Smith A, Feddersen R, Joste N, Moyzis R, Griffith J. Association between outcome and telomere DNA content in prostate cancer. J Urol 1999; 162: 1788–92.
- 27 Meeker AK, Hicks JL, Platz EA, March GE, Bennett CJ, Delannoy MJ, De Marzo AM. Telomere shortening is an early somatic DNA alteration in human prostate tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 6405–9.
- 28 Fordyce CA, Heaphy CM, Joste NE, Smith AY, Hunt WC, Griffith JK. Association between cancer-free survival and telomere DNA content in prostate tumors. J Urol 2005; 173: 610–4.
- 29
Odagiri E,
Kanada N,
Jibiki K,
Demura R,
Aikawa E,
Demura H.
Reduction of telomeric length and c-erbB-2 gene amplification in human breast cancer, fibroadenoma, and gynecomastia. Relationship to histologic grade and clinical parameters.
Cancer
1994;
73:
2978–84.
10.1002/1097-0142(19940615)73:12<2978::AID-CNCR2820731215>3.0.CO;2-5 PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 30 Griffith JK, Bryant JE, Fordyce CA, Gilliland FD, Joste NE, Moyzis RK. Reduced telomere DNA content is correlated with genomic instability and metastasis in invasive human breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999; 54: 59–64.
- 31 Meeker AK, Hicks JL, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Montgomery EA, Westra WH, Chan TY, Ronnett BM, De Marzo AM. Telomere length abnormalities occur early in the initiation of epithelial carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 3317–26.
- 32 Meeker AK, Argani P. Telomere shortening occurs early during breast tumorigenesis: a cause of chromosome destabilization underlying malignant transformation? J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2004; 9: 285–96.
- 33 O'Connell P, Pekkel V, Fuqua SA, Osborne CK, Clark GM, Allred DC. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in 399 premalignant breast lesions at 15 genetic loci. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 697–703.
- 34 Aubele MM, Cummings MC, Mattis AE, Zitzelsberger HF, Walch AK, Kremer M, Hofler H, Werner M. Accumulation of chromosomal imbalances from intraductal proliferative lesions to adjacent in situ and invasive ductal breast cancer. Diagn Mol Pathol 2000; 9: 14–9.
- 35 Farabegoli F, Champeme MH, Bieche I, Santini D, Ceccarelli C, Derenzini M, Lidereau R. Genetic pathways in the evolution of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. J Pathol 2002; 196: 280–6.
- 36 Deng G, Lu Y, Zlotnikov G, Thor AD, Smith HS. Loss of heterozygosity in normal tissue adjacent to breast carcinomas. Science 1996; 274: 2057–9.
- 37 Forsti A, Louhelainen J, Soderberg M, Wijkstrom H, Hemminiki K. Loss of heterozygosity in tumour-adjacent normal tissue of breast and bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 1372–80.
- 38
Lakhani SR,
Chaggar R,
Davies S,
Jones C,
Collins N,
Odel C,
Stratton MR,
O'Hare MJ.
Genetic alterations in ‘normal’ luminal and myoepithelial cells of the breast.
J Pathol
1999;
189:
496–503.
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199912)189:4<496::AID-PATH485>3.0.CO;2-D CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 39 Kurose K, Hoshaw-Woodard S, Adeyinka A, Lemeshow S, Watson PH, Eng C. Genetic model of multi-step breast carcinogenesis involving the epithelium and stroma: clues to tumor-microenvironment interactions. Hum Mol Gen 2001; 10: 1907–13.
- 40 Moinfar F, Man YG, Arnould L, Bratthauer GL, Ratschek M, Tavassoli FA. Concurrent and independent genetic alterations in the stromal and epithelial cells of mammary carcinoma: implications for tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 2562–6.
- 41 Larson PS, de las Morenas A, Bennett SR, Cupples LA, Rosenberg CL. Loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in histologically normal breast epithelium is distinct from loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in co-existing carcinomas. Am J Pathol 2002; 161: 283–90.
- 42 Meeker AK, Hicks JL, Gabrielson E, Strauss WM, De Marzo AM, Argani P. Telomere shortening occurs in subsets of normal breast epithelium as well as in situ and invasive carcinoma. Am J Pathol 2004; 164: 925–35.
- 43 Euhus DM, Cler L, Shivapurkar N, Milchgrub S, Peters GN, Leitch AM, Heda S, Gazdar AF. Loss of heterozygosity in benign breast epithelium in relation to breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 858–60.
- 44 Ellsworth DL, Ellsworth RE, Love B, Deyarmin B, Lubert SM, Mittal V, Shriver CD. Genomic patterns of allelic imbalance in disease-free tissue adjacent to primary breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 88: 131–9.
- 45 Hines WC, Fajardo AM, Joste NE, Bisoffi M, Griffith JK. Quantitative and spatial measurements of telomerase reverse transcriptase expression within normal and malignant human breast tissues. Mol Cancer Res 2005; 3: 503–9.
- 46 Fordyce CA, Heaphy CM, Griffith JK. Chemiluminescent measurement of telomere DNA content in biopsies. Biotechniques 2002; 33: 144–6, 8.
- 47 Bryant JE, Hutchings KG, Moyzis RK, Griffith JK. Measurement of telomeric DNA content in human tissues. Biotechniques 1997; 23: 476–8, 80, 82.
- 48 Baird DM, Kipling D. The extent and significance of telomere loss with age. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1019: 265–8.
- 49 Aviv A. Telomeres and human aging: facts and fibs. Sci Aging Knowl Environ 2004; 51: 43.
- 50 Mathieu N, Pirzio L, Freulet-Marriere MA, Desmaze C, Sabatier L. Telomeres and chromosomal instability. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004; 61: 641–56.
- 51 Simpson PT, Reis-Filho JS, Gale T, Lakhani SR. Molecular evolution of breast cancer. Mol J Pathol 2005; 205: 248–54.
- 52 Kenemans P, Verstraeten RA, Verheijen RH. Oncogenic pathways in hereditary and sporadic breast cancer. Maturitas 2004; 49: 34–43.
- 53 O'Connell P. Genetic and cytogenetic analyses of breast cancer yield different perspectives of a complex disease. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 78: 347–57.
- 54 Pathak S, Nemeth MA, Multani AS, Thalmann GN, von Eschenbach AC, Chung LW. Can cancer cells transform normal host cells into malignant cells? Br J Cancer 1997; 76: 1134–8.
- 55 Ozen M, Multani AS, Kuniyasu H, Chung LW, von Eschenbach AC, Pathak S. Specific histologic and cytogenetic evidence for in vivo malignant transformation of murine host cells by three human prostate cancer cell lines. Oncol Res 1997; 9: 433–8.
- 56
Slaughter DP,
Southwick HW,
Smejkal W.
Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium; clinical implications of multicentric origin.
Cancer
1953;
6:
963–8.
10.1002/1097-0142(195309)6:5<963::AID-CNCR2820060515>3.0.CO;2-Q CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 57 Braakhuis BJ, Tabor MP, Kummer JA, Leemans CR, Brakenhoff RH. A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 1727–30.
- 58
Garcia SB,
Park HS,
Novelli M,
Wright NA.
Field cancerization, clonality, and epithelial stem cells: the spread of mutated clones in epithelial sheets.
J Pathol
1999;
187:
61–81.
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199901)187:1<61::AID-PATH247>3.0.CO;2-I CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 59 Hockel M, Dornhofer N. The hydra phenomenon of cancer: why tumors recur locally after microscopically complete resection. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 2997–3002.
- 60 Tycko B. Genetic and epigenetic mosaicism in cancer precursor tissues. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 983: 43–54.
- 61 Braakhuis BJ, Leemans CR, Brakenhoff RH. Expanding fields of genetically altered cells in head and neck squamous carcinogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol 2005; 15: 113–20.
- 62 Ellsworth DL, Ellsworth RE, Liebman MN, Hooke JA, Shriver CD. Genomic instability in histologically normal breast tissues: implications for carcinogenesis. Lancet Oncol 2004; 5: 753–8.
- 63 Li Z, Moore DH, Meng ZH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Dairkee SH. Increased risk of local recurrence is associated with allelic loss in normal lobules of breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 1000–3.
- 64 Huston TL, Simmons RM. Locally recurrent breast cancer after conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2005; 189: 229–35.
- 65 Klimberg VS, Harms S, Korourian S. Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 1999; 8: 77–84.
- 66 Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 383–93.
- 67 Meric-Bernstam F. Breast conservation in breast cancer: surgical and adjuvant considerations. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 16: 31–6.