Volume 13, Issue 6 pp. 737-744
Original Article

Protein and energy metabolism response to the initial dose of infliximab in children with Crohn's disease

Steven J. Steiner MD

Corresponding Author

Steven J. Steiner MD

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive/ROC 4210, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5225Search for more papers by this author
Marian D. Pfefferkorn MD

Marian D. Pfefferkorn MD

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph F. Fitzgerald MD

Joseph F. Fitzgerald MD

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Search for more papers by this author
Scott C. Denne MD

Scott C. Denne MD

Division of Pediatric Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 January 2007
Citations: 7

Abstract

Background: Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) may contribute to the alterations in protein and energy metabolism present in children with Crohn's disease (CD), who frequently suffer from growth disturbance. We hypothesized that anti-TNF-α therapy would reduce protein losses, due to decreased proteolysis and increased protein synthesis, and that anti-TNF-α therapy would decrease resting energy expenditure.

Methods: Children with active CD underwent metabolic assessment immediately before and 2 weeks following initial infliximab infusion. Using the stable isotopes [d5] phenylalanine and [1–13C] leucine, 2 independent measures of protein metabolism were determined during fasting and in response to parenteral nutrition. Energy expenditure, determined by indirect calorimetry, was measured in fasting and parenterally fed states.

Results: Fifteen children completed the study. Following infliximab therapy, significant reductions in proteolysis (P < 0.05) were noted in the fasting state (8%–11%) and during parenteral nutrition infusion (10%–12%). Phenylalanine utilization for protein synthesis decreased significantly (8%–13%) following infliximab (P < 0.05). Protein balance was not significantly altered. No significant changes in energy expenditure were observed following infliximab in fasting or parenterally fed states. Supplementation with parenteral nutrition resulted in significantly decreased proteolysis (8%–21%; P < 0.05), increased protein synthesis (37%–45%; P < 0.01), and improved protein balance (P < 0.01) compared to the fasting state.

Conclusions: Following the initial infliximab infusion in children with CD, proteolysis and protein synthesis were significantly reduced in the fasting and parenterally fed states. Supplementation with parenteral nutrition resulted in significant improvements in protein metabolism compared to the fasting state both before and after infliximab therapy.

(Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007)

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.