Volume 68, Issue 1 pp. 380-383
Clinical Observations in Hepatology
Free Access

Nonstructural protein 5A/P32 deletion after failure of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection

Akira Doi

Akira Doi

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hayato Hikita

Hayato Hikita

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Ryotaro Sakamori

Ryotaro Sakamori

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yuki Tahata

Yuki Tahata

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yugo Kai

Yugo Kai

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Ryoko Yamada

Ryoko Yamada

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takayuki Yakushijin

Takayuki Yakushijin

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Eiji Mita

Eiji Mita

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazuyoshi Ohkawa

Kazuyoshi Ohkawa

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yasuharu Imai

Yasuharu Imai

Ikeda Municipal Hospital, Ikeda, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kunimaro Furuta

Kunimaro Furuta

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takahiro Kodama

Takahiro Kodama

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tomohide Tatsumi

Tomohide Tatsumi

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tetsuo Takehara

Corresponding Author

Tetsuo Takehara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE AND REPRINT REQUESTS TO:

Tetsuo Takehara, M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

2-2 Yamadaoka

Suita, Osaka, Japan 565-0871

E-mail: [email protected]

Tel: +81-6-6879-3621

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 February 2018
Citations: 17

Potential conflict of interest: Dr. Kodama received grants from Gilead. Dr. Takehara is on the speakers' bureau for and received grants from Gilead.

This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Research on Hepatitis from the Japan Agency for Medical Research.

Abbreviations

  • DAAs
  • direct-acting antivirals
  • NS5A
  • nonstructural protein 5A
  • RASs
  • resistance-associated substitutions
  • P32del
  • P32 deletion
  • VF
  • virological failure
  • Nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors play an essential role in the combination treatment of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Daclatasvir, a prototype of this class, combined with asunaprevir, has been widely used since 2014 in Asia, where genotype 1b infection is prevalent. Well-known resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) for this treatment include NS5A-L31M/V and Y93H. In addition, recent studies have reported the emergence of a deletion mutant at NS5A-P32 in a subset of patients at the time of virological failure (VF) with this treatment.1 This mutant is attracting much attention because replicon studies indicate that, compared with NS5A-Y93H, it confers extremely higher resistance to NS5A inhibitors.2 Moreover, retreatment with DAAs in patients carrying this mutant after daclatasvir/asunaprevir treatment has been reported to be ineffective.3 Here, we report on a case of NS5A-P32 deletion (P32del) after ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment.

    We treated 1,031 Japanese patients with genotype 1 CHC with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and 12 cases exhibited VF. Among these cases, sera from 10 patients available were analyzed for NS5A RAS by deep sequencing, as described1 (Table 1). All patients had genotype 1b infection and, except for case no. 1, exhibited the NS5A Y93H substitution at baseline or after VF. Case no. 1 showed P32del at the time of VF; the P32del was not detected at baseline (0.1% deep sequencing cutoff), but appeared 4 weeks after completion of 12 weeks of treatment and was continuously detected at a high frequency for 52 weeks (Fig. 1A). After the appearance of the P32del, nucleotide sequences of NS5A domain-I in a major clone were completely consistent at any point. In addition, known RASs to sofosbuvir, including S282T, were not detected by deep sequencing during the entire course. The patient was a 75-year-old treatment-naïve man with compensated cirrhosis with a treatment history for hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Table 1. NS5A RASs at Baseline and After Treatment Failure With Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir
    RAS at the Start of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Treatment Duration RAS After Failure of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Treatment
    Case R30 L31 P32 Q54 Y93 of Therapy Effect Point R30 L31 P32 Q54 Y93
    1 M (99.7%) 12W Relapse Post 4W M (84.5%) V (15.5%) del (84.5%)
    2 F (3.8%) V (3.1%) H (62.5%) 12W Relapse Post 4W F (5.4%) V (3.6%) H (99.7%)
    3 V (12.9%) H (34.9%) 12W Relapse Post 4W V (60.9%) H (99.7%)
    4 V (62.3%) M (37.1%) H (32.3%) H (96.5%) 12W Relapse Post 4W V (81.3%) M (18.3%) H (14.4%) H (99.6%)
    5 Q (99.6%) H (99.8%) 12W Relapse Post 12W N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
    6 F (1.2%) H (75.5%) H (63.0%) 12W Relapse Post 12W H (99.9%) H (99.7%)
    7 Q (99.4%) H (1.2%) H (62.6%) N (35.7%) S (1.4%) 12W Relapse Post 12W Q (99.8%) H (0.4%) H (99.8%)
    8 V (2.8%) H (96.5%) H (3.3%) 4W Relapse Post 12W V (24.2%) I (12.7%) H (61.2%) H (33.2%)
    9 Q (94.3%) H (6.4%) 8W Relapse Post 12W Q (96.5%) H (99.8%)
    10 4W Relapse Post 12W M (1.5%) H (93.8%) N (5.3%)
    • A cut-off threshold of 0.1% was set. –, not detected; del, deletion. Point refers to point of resistance test after re-elevation of the hepatitis C virus HCV RNA viral load.
    • Abbreviations: W, weeks; N.A., not available because of lack of success in generating PCR amplicons; del, deletion.
    Details are in the caption following the image
    Changes in blood viral load and NS5A RASs and phylogenetic tree analysis of a case (#1) in which P32 deletion variants appeared. (A) Serum HCV-RNA levels and NS5A and NS5B RASs before and after ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment. -, not detected (0.1% deep sequencing cutoff); del, deletion. (B) Phylogenetic tree analysis using deep sequencing data at baseline and 4 weeks after completion of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment. The clusters from the HCV clones at baseline and posttreatment are represented as closed symbols and open symbols, respectively; P32 deletion variants are represented as squares, and P32 wild-type variants are represented as triangles. The most frequent cluster at baseline and posttreatment is labeled A1 and B1, respectively, and then sequentially numbered; B3 and B18 are clusters of the third and eighteenth frequency after treatment, respectively. Abbreviation: HCV, hepatitis C virus.

    We performed phylogenetic tree analysis1 to clarify the relationship between pretreatment virus and posttreatment virus (Fig. 1B). This analysis indicated that the most frequent wild-type virus at baseline (A1 in Fig. 1B) acquired a deletion of three bases at position P32, becoming virus B18 posttreatment; one more sense mutation resulted in the most frequent virus, B1, posttreatment, which served as the starting point for the subsequent expansion of diversity.

    Both clinical trials and real-world data have shown that the viral clearance rate of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is over 95%. Recently, Wiles et al.4 analyzed posttreatment resistance in 51 patients (42, genotype 1a; 9, genotype 1b) who participated in ledipasvir/sofosbuvir phase I/II clinical trials and reported that the common substitutions were Q30R/H and/or Y93H/N for genotype 1a and Y93H for genotype 1b. However, these investigators did not report any instances of P32del. In our cohort, 1 of 10 patients with genotype 1b infection developed P32del, indicating that emergence of this deletion is not a specific event associated with daclatasvir/asunaprevir treatment, but can occur with other treatment regimens, at least in patients with genotype 1b infection. In our patient, the frequency of P32del variants increased after the time of VF and remained very high for an extended period of time, suggesting that the replication fitness of this variant is strong and therefore that its emergence may have an impact on the therapeutic effects of DAA retreatment using NS5A inhibitors. We should pay more attention to the appearance of this rare variant in DAA failure and may need to consider what type of retreatment is appropriate for this specific, refractory variant. Considering the extremely high resistance of this variant to NS5A inhibitors, DAA regimens containing both an NS3/4A inhibitor and sofosbuvir, addition of ribavirin or longer-duration therapies might be treatment options for patients with P32del.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.