Volume 35, Issue 11 pp. 1647-1651
Original Article

Clinical ethics consultation in patients with head and neck cancer

Andrew G. Shuman MD

Corresponding Author

Andrew G. Shuman MD

Head and Neck Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Ethics Committee, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York

Head and Neck Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Mary S. McCabe RN, MA

Mary S. McCabe RN, MA

Ethics Committee, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph J. Fins MD, MACP

Joseph J. Fins MD, MACP

Ethics Committee, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Dennis H. Kraus MD

Dennis H. Kraus MD

Head and Neck Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Jatin P. Shah MD

Jatin P. Shah MD

Head and Neck Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Snehal G. Patel MD, FRCS

Snehal G. Patel MD, FRCS

Head and Neck Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 November 2012
Citations: 16

This work was presented at the AHNS 8th International Conference on Head and Neck Cancer, Toronto, Canada, July 2012.

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to describe the impact of clinical ethics consultations among patients with head and neck cancer in order to better anticipate and manage clinical challenges.

Methods

A database was queried to identify patients with head and neck cancer for whom ethics consultation was performed at a comprehensive cancer center (n = 14). Information from the database was verified via data abstraction and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.

Results

Common requests for ethics consultation involved code status (6 of 14) and withdrawal/withholding life-sustaining treatments (6 of 14). Common contextual features were interpersonal conflicts (6 of 14) and communication barriers (5 of 14). Airway management concerns were frequent (5 of 14). Whereas 21% of patients had do not resuscitate (DNR) orders before ethics consultation, 79% were DNR subsequently.

Conclusion

Ethics consultations among patients with head and neck cancer reflect distinctive complexities inherent to their disease, but are entirely consistent with global clinical ethical themes. Consideration of communication barriers, social isolation/stigma, symptom control, and airway management are critical. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 35: 1647–1651, 2013

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.