Association of chromosome band 8q22 copy number gain with high grade invasive breast carcinomas by assessment of core needle biopsies
Logan C. Walker
Cancer Genetics Research Group, Department of Pathology, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorGavin C. Harris
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Elisabeth Wells
Department of Public Health and General Practice, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorBridget A. Robinson
Oncology Services, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Christine M. Morris
Cancer Genetics Research Group, Department of Pathology, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Cancer Genetics Research Group, Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch School of Medicine, PO Box 4345, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch, New ZealandSearch for more papers by this authorLogan C. Walker
Cancer Genetics Research Group, Department of Pathology, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorGavin C. Harris
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Elisabeth Wells
Department of Public Health and General Practice, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorBridget A. Robinson
Oncology Services, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Christine M. Morris
Cancer Genetics Research Group, Department of Pathology, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Cancer Genetics Research Group, Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch School of Medicine, PO Box 4345, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch, New ZealandSearch for more papers by this authorAbstract
Genetic analysis of breast tumor core needle biopsies may provide early diagnostic information that is useful to direct subsequent clinical management. We report metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of 42 core needle biopsies prospectively sampled from invasive ductal breast carcinomas of 41 patients, and show that recurrent chromosomal copy number changes are associated with histologically defined tumor features. As far as is known, this is the first time CGH profiles from diagnostic breast tumor core needle biopsies have been reported in association with pathological data in such detail. A comparison of Grade 1 (n = 7), Grade 2 (n = 16), and Grade 3 tumors (n = 19) revealed a chromosomal copy number gain involving 8q22 that was associated with higher grade (1/7 vs. 16/19, respectively) and therefore altered cell differentiation status. CGH results were validated using tumor touch imprints prepared from a subgroup from the same sample set (n = 18) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and two probes selected from regions of interest within 8p21 and 8q22. Overall concordance between CGH and FISH for 8p21 and 8q22 imbalances was 9/18 (50%) and 12/18 (67%), respectively. When FISH and CGH data were combined, and tumors classified according to better defined resected tumor histology available for 34cases, 19/19 Grade 3 tumors showed 8q22 gain compared with 0/6 Grade 1 tumors and 4/9 Grade 2 tumors. Further comprehensive studies are required to verify the biological significance of this association and its potential to facilitate early clinicopathological assessment of breast cancer. This article contains Supplementary Material available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1045-2257/suppmat. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
gcc20545-Walkeretal_TableS1GCC.doc177.5 KB | Supporting Information file gcc20545-Walkeretal_TableS1GCC.doc |
gcc20545-Walkeretal_TableS2GCC.doc116.5 KB | Supporting Information file gcc20545-Walkeretal_TableS2GCC.doc |
gcc20545-Walkeretal_TableS3GCC.doc212 KB | Supporting Information file gcc20545-Walkeretal_TableS3GCC.doc |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Badoual C,Maruani A,Ghorra C,Lebas P,Avigdor S,Michenet P. 2005. Pathological prognostic factors of invasive breast carcinoma in ultrasound-guided large core biopsies-correlation with subsequent surgical excisions. Breast 14: 22–27.
- Barnes DM,Harris WH,Smith P,Millis RR,Rubens RD. 1996. Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: Comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 74: 1445–1451.
- Belaud-Rotureau MA,Meunier N,Eimer S,Vital A,Loiseau H,Merlio JP. 2006. Automatized assessment of 1p36-19q13 status in gliomas by interphase FISH assay on touch imprints of frozen tumours. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 111: 255–263.
-
Bentz M,Plesch A,Stilgenbauer S,Dohner H,Lichter P.
1998.
Minimal sizes of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
21:
172–175.
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199802)21:2<172::AID-GCC14>3.0.CO;2-T CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Bergamaschi A,Kim YH,Wang P,Sorlie T,Hernandez-Boussard T,Lonning PE,Tibshirani R,Borresen-Dale AL,Pollack JR. 2006. Distinct patterns of DNA copy number alteration are associated with different clinicopathological features and gene-expression subtypes of breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 45: 1033–1040.
- Blancato J,Singh B,Liu A,Liao DJ,Dickson RB. 2004. Correlation of amplification and overexpression of the c-myc oncogene in high-grade breast cancer: FISH, in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical analyses. Br J Cancer 90: 1612–1619.
- Burki NG,Caduff R,Walt H,Moll C,Pejovic T,Haller U,Ward DC. 2000. Comparative genomic hybridization of fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer 88: 607–613.
- Cahill RA,Walsh D,Landers RJ,Watson RG. 2006. Preoperative profiling of symptomatic breast cancer by diagnostic core biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13: 45–51.
- Callagy G,Pharoah P,Chin SF,Sangan T,Daigo Y,Jackson L,Caldas C. 2005. Identification and validation of prognostic markers in breast cancer with the complementary use of array-CGH and tissue microarrays. J Pathol 205: 388–396.
- Chin K,DeVries S,Fridlyand J,Spellman PT,Roydasgupta R,Kuo WL,Lapuk A,Neve RM,Qian Z,Ryder T,Chen F,Feiler H,Tokuyasu T,Kingsley C,Dairkee S,Meng Z,Chew K,Pinkel D,Jain A,Ljung BM,Esserman L,Albertson DG,Waldman FM,Gray JW. 2006. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell 10: 529–541.
- Chin SF,Wang Y,Thorne NP,Teschendorff AE,Pinder SE,Vias M,Naderi A,Roberts I,Barbosa-Morais NL,Garcia MJ,Iyer NG,Kranjac T,Robertson JF,Aparicio S,Tavare S,Ellis I,Brenton JD,Caldas C. 2007. Using array-comparative genomic hybridization to define molecular portraits of primary breast cancers. Oncogene 26: 1959–1970.
- Courjal F,Theillet C. 1997. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of breast tumors with predetermined profiles of DNA amplification. Cancer Res 57: 4368–4377.
- Crossen PE,Morrison MJ,Rodley P,Cochrane J,Morris CM. 1999. Identification of amplified genes in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia and double minute chromosomes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 113: 126–133.
- Ein-Dor L,Kela I,Getz G,Givol D,Domany E. 2005. Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: Is there a unique set? Bioinformatics 21: 171–178.
- Elston CW,Ellis IO. 1991. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19: 403–410.
- Fiegler H,Carr P,Douglas EJ,Burford DC,Hunt S,Scott CE,Smith J,Vetrie D,Gorman P,Tomlinson IP,Carter NP. 2003. DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 36: 361–374.
- Forozan F,Mahlamaki EH,Monni O,Chen Y,Veldman R,Jiang Y,Gooden GC,Ethier SP,Kallioniemi A,Kallioniemi OP. 2000. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 38 breast cancer cell lines: A basis for interpreting complementary DNA microarray data. Cancer Res 60: 4519–4525.
- Fridlyand J,Snijders AM,Ylstra B,Li H,Olshen A,Segraves R,Dairkee S,Tokuyasu T,Ljung BM,Jain AN,McLennan J,Ziegler J,Chin K,Devries S,Feiler H,Gray JW,Waldman F,Pinkel D,Albertson DG. 2006. Breast tumor copy number aberration phenotypes and genomic instability. BMC Cancer 6: 96.
- Harris GC,Denley HE,Pinder SE,Lee AH,Ellis IO,Elston CW,Evans A. 2003. Correlation of histologic prognostic factors in core biopsies and therapeutic excisions of invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27: 11–15.
-
Hermsen MA,Baak JP,Meijer GA,Weiss JM,Walboomers JW,Snijders PJ,van Diest PJ.
1998.
Genetic analysis of 53 lymph node-negative breast carcinomas by CGH and relation to clinical, pathological, morphometric, and DNA cytometric prognostic factors.
J Pathol
186:
356–362.
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199812)186:4<356::AID-PATH196>3.0.CO;2-Z CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Hyman E,Kauraniemi P,Hautaniemi S,Wolf M,Mousses S,Rozenblum E,Ringner M,Sauter G,Monni O,Elkahloun A,Kallioniemi OP,Kallioniemi A. 2002. Impact of DNA amplification on gene expression patterns in breast cancer. Cancer Res 62: 6240–6245.
- Isola JJ,Kallioniemi OP,Chu LW,Fuqua SA,Hilsenbeck SG,Osborne CK,Waldman FM. 1995. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node-negative breast cancer. Am J Pathol 147: 905–911.
- Janssen EA,Baak JP,Guervos MA,van Diest PJ,Jiwa M,Hermsen MA. 2003. In lymph node-negative invasive breast carcinomas, specific chromosomal aberrations are strongly associated with high mitotic activity and predict outcome more accurately than grade, tumour diameter, and oestrogen receptor. J Pathol 201: 555–561.
- Kallioniemi OP,Kallioniemi A,Piper J,Isola J,Waldman FM,Gray JW,Pinkel D. 1994. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 10: 231–243.
- Kaneko S,Gerasimova T,Butler WM,Cupples TE,Guerry PL,Greene GR,Young SR. 2002. The use of FISH on breast core needle samples for the presurgical assessment of HER-2 oncogene status. Exp Mol Pathol 73: 61–66.
- Kaya H,Ragazzini T,Aribal E,Guney I,Kotiloglu E. 2001. Her-2/neu gene amplification compared with HER-2/neu protein overexpression on ultrasound guided core-needle biopsy specimens of breast carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res 7: 279–283.
- Larramendy ML,Lushnikova T,Bjorkqvist AM,Wistuba II,Virmani AK,Shivapurkar N,Gazdar AF,Knuutila S. 2000. Comparative genomic hybridization reveals complex genetic changes in primary breast cancer tumors and their cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 119: 132–138.
- Loo LW,Grove DI,Williams EM,Neal CL,Cousens LA,Schubert EL,Holcomb IN,Massa HF,Glogovac J,Li CI,Malone KE,Daling JR,Delrow JJ,Trask BJ,Hsu L,Porter PL. 2004. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of genomic alterations in breast cancer subtypes. Cancer Res 64: 8541–8549.
-
Loveday RL,Greenman J,Simcox DL,Speirs V,Drew PJ,Monson JR,Kerin MJ.
2000.
Genetic changes in breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridisation.
Int J Cancer
86:
494–500.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000515)86:4<494::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-O CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- McCarty KS,Jr.,Miller LS,Cox EB,Konrath J,McCarty KS,Sr. 1985. Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109: 716–721.
- F Mitelman, editor. 1995. ISCN. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel: S. Karger.
- Molist R,Remvikos Y,Dutrillaux B,Muleris M. 2004. Characterization of a new cytogenetic subtype of ductal breast carcinomas. Oncogene 23: 5986–5993.
- Nagel H,Schulten HJ,Gunawan B,Brinck U,Fuzesi L. 2002. The potential value of comparative genomic hybridization analysis in effusion-and fine needle aspiration cytology. Mod Pathol 15: 818–825.
- Naylor TL,Greshock J,Wang Y,Colligon T,Yu QC,Clemmer V,Zaks TZ,Weber BL. 2005. High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Breast Cancer Res 7: R1186–R1198.
- Nessling M,Richter K,Schwaenen C,Roerig P,Wrobel G,Wessendorf S,Fritz B,Bentz M,Sinn HP,Radlwimmer B,Lichter P. 2005. Candidate genes in breast cancer revealed by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization of archived tissue. Cancer Res 65: 439–447.
- Pierga JY,Reis-Filho JS,Cleator SJ,Dexter T,MacKay A,Simpson P,Fenwick K,Iravani M,Salter J,Hills M,Jones C,Ashworth A,Smith IE,Powles T,Dowsett M. 2007. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 96: 341–351.
- Pinkel D,Segraves R,Sudar D,Clark S,Poole I,Kowbel D,Collins C,Kuo WL,Chen C,Zhai Y,Dairkee SH,Ljung BM,Gray JW,Albertson DG. 1998. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20: 207–211.
- Pollack JR,Sorlie T,Perou CM,Rees CA,Jeffrey SS,Lonning PE,Tibshirani R,Botstein D,Borresen-Dale AL,Brown PO. 2002. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12963–12968.
- Putti TC,El-Rehim DM,Rakha EA,Paish CE,Lee AH,Pinder SE,Ellis IO. 2005. Estrogen receptor-negative breast carcinomas: A review of morphology and immunophenotypical analysis. Mod Pathol 18: 26–35.
- Reis-Filho JS,Simpson PT,Gale T,Lakhani SR. 2005. The molecular genetics of breast cancer: The contribution of comparative genomic hybridization. Pathol Res Pract 201: 713–725.
- Rennstam K,Ahlstedt-Soini M,Baldetorp B,Bendahl PO,Borg A,Karhu R,Tanner M,Tirkkonen M,Isola J. 2003. Patterns of chromosomal imbalances defines subgroups of breast cancer with distinct clinical features and prognosis. A study of 305 tumors by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 63: 8861–8868.
- Richard F,Pacyna-Gengelbach M,Schluns K,Fleige B,Winzer KJ,Szymas J,Dietel M,Petersen I,Schwendel A. 2000. Patterns of chromosomal imbalances in invasive breast cancer. Int J Cancer 89: 305–310.
- Robanus-Maandag EC,Bosch CA,Kristel PM,Hart AA,Faneyte IF,Nederlof PM,Peterse JL,van de Vijver MJ. 2003. Association of C-MYC amplification with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage in C-MYC-amplified breast carcinomas. J Pathol 201: 75–82.
-
Rodley P,McDonald M,Price B,Fright R,Morris C.
1997.
Comparative genomic hybridization reveals previously undescribed amplifications and deletions in the chronic myeloid leukemia-derived K-562 cell line.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
19:
36–42.
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199705)19:1<36::AID-GCC6>3.0.CO;2-1 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Romeo MS,Sokolova IA,Morrison LE,Zeng C,Baron AE,Hirsch FR,Miller YE,Franklin WA,Varella-Garcia M. 2003. Chromosomal abnormalities in non-small cell lung carcinomas and in bronchial epithelia of high-risk smokers detected by multi-target interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Mol Diagn 5: 103–112.
- Roylance R,Gorman P,Harris W,Liebmann R,Barnes D,Hanby A,Sheer D. 1999. Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. Cancer Res 59: 1433–1436.
- Roylance R,Gorman P,Papior T,Wan YL,Ives M,Watson JE,Collins C,Wortham N,Langford C,Fiegler H,Carter N,Gillett C,Sasieni P,Pinder S,Hanby A,Tomlinson I. 2006. A comprehensive study of chromosome 16q in invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinoma using array CGH. Oncogene 25: 6544–6553.
- Rummukainen J,Kytola S,Karhu R,Farnebo F,Larsson C,Isola JJ. 2001a. Aberrations of chromosome 8 in 16 breast cancer cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization and spectral karyotyping. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 126: 1–7.
- Rummukainen JK,Salminen T,Lundin J,Kytola S,Joensuu H,Isola JJ. 2001b. Amplification of c-myc by fluorescence in situ hybridization in a population-based breast cancer tissue array. Mod Pathol 14: 1030–1035.
-
Sambrook J,Fritsch EF,Maniatis T.
1989.
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,
2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor, NY:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01434.x Google Scholar
- Seute A,Sinn HP,Schlenk RF,Emig R,Wallwiener D,Grischke EM,Hohaus S,Dohner H,Haas R,Bentz M. 2001. Clinical relevance of genomic aberrations in homogeneously treated high-risk stage II/III breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 93: 80–84.
- Simpson PT,Reis-Filho JS,Gale T,Lakhani SR. 2005. Molecular evolution of breast cancer. J Pathol 205: 248–254.
- Somiari SB,Shriver CD,He J,Parikh K,Jordan R,Hooke J,Hu H,Deyarmin B,Lubert S,Malicki L,Heckman C,Somiari RI. 2004. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 155: 108–118.
- Stange DE,Radlwimmer B,Schubert F,Traub F,Pich A,Toedt G,Mendrzyk F,Lehmann U,Eils R,Kreipe H,Lichter P. 2006. High-resolution genomic profiling reveals association of chromosomal aberrations on 1q and 16p with histologic and genetic subgroups of invasive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 345–352.
- Teixeira MR,Pandis N,Heim S. 2002. Cytogenetic clues to breast carcinogenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 33: 1–16.
-
Tirkkonen M,Tanner M,Karhu R,Kallioniemi A,Isola J,Kallioniemi OP.
1998.
Molecular cytogenetics of primary breast cancer by CGH.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
21:
177–184.
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199803)21:3<177::AID-GCC1>3.0.CO;2-X CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Vanden Bempt I,Vanhentenrijk V,Drijkoningen M,De Wolf- Peeters C. 2006. Comparative expressed sequence hybridization reveals differential gene expression in morphological breast cancer subtypes. J Pathol 208: 486–494.
- Varga Z,Caduff R,Pestalozzi B. 2005. Stability of the HER2 gene after primary chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Virchows Arch 446: 136–141.
- Varma G,Varma R,Huang H,Pryshchepava A,Groth J,Fleming D,Nowak NJ,McQuaid D,Conroy J,Mahoney M,Moysich K,Falkner KL,Geradts J. 2005. Array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) analysis of premenopausal breast cancers from a nuclear fallout area and matched cases from Western New York. Br J Cancer 93: 699–708.
- Walker LC. 2007. Genetic Aberrations in Breast Cancer. PhD Thesis. University of Otago at Christchurch.
- Weber-Mangal S,Sinn HP,Popp S,Klaes R,Emig R,Bentz M,Mansmann U,Bastert G,Bartram CR,Jauch A. 2003. Breast cancer in young women (< or = 35 years): Genomic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Int J Cancer 107: 583–592.
- Weiss MM,Hermsen MA,Meijer GA,van Grieken NC,Baak JP,Kuipers EJ,van Diest PJ. 1999. Comparative genomic hybridisation. Mol Pathol 52: 243–251.