Volume 44, Issue 12 pp. 9367-9381
SPECIAL ISSUE RESEARCH ARTICLE

Screening of novel water/ionic liquid working fluids for absorption thermal energy storage in cooling systems

Wei Wu

Corresponding Author

Wei Wu

School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China

Correspondence

Wei Wu, School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Tian You

Tian You

Department of Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Leung

Michael Leung

School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 October 2019
Citations: 31
This paper is an extended and revised article presented at the International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2018 (SEGT 2018) on 11-14 December 2018 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Summary

Absorption thermal energy storage (ATES) is significant for renewable/waste energy utilization in buildings. The ATES systems using ionic liquids (ILs) are explored to avoid crystallization and enhance the performance. Property model and cycle model have been established with verified accuracies. Based on the preliminary screening, seven ILs are found feasible to be ATES working fluids, while four ILs ([DMIM][DMP], [EMIM][Ac], [EMIM][DEP], and [EMIM][EtSO4]) have been selected for detailed comparisons. The coefficient of performance (COP) and energy storage density (ESD) of the ATES using different H2O/ILs are compared with H2O/LiBr. Results show that the operating temperatures of LiBr are constrained by crystallization, limiting the COPs and ESDs under higher generation temperatures and lower condensation temperatures. With varying Tg, [DMIM][DMP] yields higher COPs with Tg above 100°C and [EMIM][Ac] yields comparable ESDs (67.7 vs 67.1 kWh/m3) with Tg around 120°C, as compared with LiBr. The maximum COP is 0.745 for [DMIM][DMP]. With varying Tc, [DMIM][DMP] yields higher COPs with Tc below 38°C and [EMIM][Ac] yields higher ESDs with Tc below 33°C, as compared with LiBr. The maximum ESD is 87.5 kWh/m3 for [EMIM][Ac]. With varying Te, [DMIM][DMP] yields higher COPs with Te above 8°C, as compared with LiBr. The maximum ESD of ILs is 104.0 kWh/m3 for [EMIM][EtSO4]. Comparing with the volume-based ESDs, the differences between ILs and LiBr are smaller for the mass-based ESDs. This work can provide suggestions for the selection of novel working fluids for ATES for performance and reliability enhancement.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.