Review Paper
A review on clean energy solutions for better sustainability
Ibrahim Dincer,
Canan Acar,
Corresponding Author
Ibrahim Dincer
Clean Energy Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4 Canada
Correspondence: Ibrahim Dincer, Clean Energy Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7K4, Canada.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCanan Acar
Clean Energy Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorIbrahim Dincer,
Canan Acar,
Corresponding Author
Ibrahim Dincer
Clean Energy Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4 Canada
Correspondence: Ibrahim Dincer, Clean Energy Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7K4, Canada.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCanan Acar
Clean Energy Research Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This paper focuses on clean energy solutions in order to achieve better sustainability, and hence discusses opportunities and challenges from various dimensions, including social, economic, energetic and environmental aspects. It also evaluates the current and potential states and applications of possible clean-energy systems. In the first part of this study, renewable and nuclear energy sources are comparatively assessed and ranked based on their outputs. By ranking energy sources based on technical, economic, and environmental performance criteria, it is aimed to identify the improvement potential for each option considered. The results show that in power generation, nuclear has the highest (7.06/10) and solar photovoltaic (PV) has the lowest (2.30/10). When nonair pollution criteria, such as land use, water contamination, and waste issues are considered, the power generation ranking changes, and geothermal has the best (7.23/10) and biomass has the lowest performance (3.72/10). When heating and cooling modes are considered as useful outputs, geothermal and biomass have approximately the same technical, environmental, and cost performances (as 4.9/10), and solar has the lowest ranking (2/10). Among hydrogen production energy sources, nuclear gives the highest (6.5/10) and biomass provides the lowest (3.6/10) in ranking. In the second part of the present study, multigeneration systems are introduced, and their potential benefits are discussed along with the recent studies in the literature. It is shown that numerous advantages are offered by renewable energy-based integrated systems with multiple outputs, especially in reducing overall energy demand, system cost and emissions while significantly improving overall efficiencies and hence output generation rates. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- 1 International Energy Agency Technical Report. Key World Energy Statistics, 2014. Website: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2014.pdf; 2014 [accessed 01.11.2014].
- 2 Dincer I. Potential options to greenize energy systems. Sixth International Green Energy Conference, Eskisehir, Turkey; 2011. June 5–9, Keynote Lecture.
- 3 Delwulf J, Van Langenhove H. Integrating industrial ecology principles into a set of environmental sustainability indicators for technology assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2005; 43: 419–432.
- 4 International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Report. Energy indicators for sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. Website: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1222_web.pdf; 2005 [accessed 02.11.2014].
- 5 United Nations Commission for Sustainable Development (UNCSD) Technical Report. Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. Website: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf; 2007 [accessed 01.11.2014].
- 6 Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 2012; 15: 281–299.
- 7 Mainali B, Silveira S. Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 41: 1351–1365.
- 8 Dincer I, Rosen MA. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Applied Energy 1999; 64: 427–440.
- 9 Dincer I. Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2000; 4: 157–175.
- 10 Dincer I, Rosen MA. Thermodynamic aspects of renewables and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2005; 9: 169–189.
- 11 Midilli A, Dincer I, Ay M. Green energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy Policy 2006; 34: 3623–3633.
- 12 Dincer I, Zamfirescu C. Potential options to greenize energy systems. Energy 2012; 46: 5–15.
- 13 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Technical Report. Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Website: http://srren.ipcc-wg3.de/report/IPCC_SRREN_Full_Report.pdf; 2011 [accessed 01.11.2014].
- 14 Högselius P. Spent nuclear fuel policies in historical perspective: an international comparison. Energy Policy 2009; 37: 254–263.
- 15 Bazmi AA, Zahedi G. Sustainable energy systems: role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 3480–3500.
- 16 U. S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Technical Report. International energy outlook. Website: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2013).pdf;2013 [accessed 03/11/2014].
- 17 International Energy Agency Technical Report. Renewables for heating and cooling. Website: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/renewable_heating_cooling_final_web.pdf; 2006 [accessed 06.11.2014].
- 18 Suleman F, Dincer I, Agelin-Chaab M. Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated solar heat pump system. Applied Thermal Engineering 2014; 73: 557–564.
- 19 European Technology Platform on Renewable Heating and Cooling. Common Vision for the Renewable Heating and Cooling sector in Europe. Website: http://www.cordis.europa.eu/pub/etp/docs/rhc-vision_en.pdf. [accessed 03/11/2014].
- 20 Dincer I. Technical, environmental and exergetic aspects of hydrogen energy systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2002; 27: 265–285.
- 21 Midilli A, Ay M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. On hydrogen and hydrogen energy strategies I: current status and needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2005; 9: 255–271.
- 22 Dincer I. Green methods for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37: 1954–1971.
- 23 Dincer I, Naterer GF. Overview of hydrogen production research in the Clean Energy Research Laboratory (CERL) at UOIT. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2014. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.074.
- 24 Orhan MF, Dincer I, Rosen MA, Kanoglu M. Integrated nuclear hydrogen production options based on renewable and nuclear energy sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012; 16: 6059–6082.
- 25 Granovskii M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Air pollution reduction via use of green energy sources for electricity and hydrogen production. Atmospheric Environment 2007; 41: 1777–1783.
- 26 Midilli A, Dincer I. Key strategies of hydrogen energy systems for sustainability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2007; 32: 511–524.
- 27 Midilli A, Dincer I. Hydrogen as a renewable and sustainable solution in reducing global fossil fuel consumption. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2008; 33: 4209–4222.
- 28 Dincer I, Rosen MA. Sustainability aspects of hydrogen and fuel cell systems. Energy for Sustainable Development 2011; 15: 137–146.
- 29 Dincer I, Zamfirescu C. Sustainable hydrogen production options and the role of IAHE. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37: 16266–16286.
- 30 Ozbilen A, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Comparative environmental impact and efficiency assessment of selected hydrogen production methods. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2013; 42: 1–9.
- 31 Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. Website: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_wg2_report_impacts_adaptation_and_vulnerability.htm [accessed 15.11.12].
- 32 Cetinkaya E, Dincer I, Naterer GF. Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37: 2071–2080.
- 33 Hacatoglu K, Rosen MA, Dincer I. Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen and other selected fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37: 9933–9940.
- 34 Acar C, Dincer I. Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2014; 39: 1–12.
- 35 Pehnt M. Environmental impacts of distributed energy systems—The case of micro cogeneration. Environmental Science and Policy 2008; 11: 25–37.
- 36 Hogerwaard J, Dincer I, Zamfirescu C. Analysis and assessment of a new organic Rankine based heat engine system with/without cogeneration. Energy 2013; 62: 300–310.
- 37 Liu M, Shi Y, Fang F. Combined cooling, heating and power systems: a survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014; 35: 1–22.
- 38 Lund H, Andersen AN. Optimal designs of small CHP plants in a market with fluctuating electricity prices. Energy Conversion and Management 2005; 46: 893–904.
- 39 Christidis A, Koch C, Pottel L, Tsatsaronis G. The contribution of heat storage to the profitable operation of combined heat and power plants in liberalized electricity markets. Energy 2012; 41: 75–82.
- 40 Blarke MB. Towards an intermittency-friendly energy system: comparing electric boilers and heat pumps in distributed cogeneration. Applied Energy 2012; 91: 349–365.
- 41 Nuytten T, Claessens B, Paredis K, van Bael J, Six D. Flexibility of a combined heat and power system with thermal energy storage for district heating. Applied Energy 2013; 104: 583–591.
- 42 Ludig S, Haller M, Bauer N. Tackling long-term climate change together: the case of flexible CCS and fluctuating renewable energy. Energy Procedia 2011; 4: 2580–2587.
- 43 Depuru SSSR, Wang L, Devabhaktuni V. Smart meters for power grid: challenges, issues, advantages and status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 2736–2742.
- 44 Cook B, Gazzano J, Gunay Z, Hiller L, Mahajan S, Taskan A, Vilogorac S. The smart meter and a smarter consumer: quantifying the benefits of smart meter implementation in the United States. Chemistry Central Journal 2012; 6: 1–16.
- 45 Joung M, Kim J. Assessing demand response and smart metering impacts on long-term electricity market prices and system reliability. Applied Energy 2013; 101: 441–448.
- 46
Procter R. Integrating time-differentiated rates, demand response, and smart grid to manage power system costs. The Electricity Journal 2013; 26: 50–60.
10.1016/j.tej.2013.02.017 Google Scholar
- 47
Cutter E,
Woo CW,
Kahrl F,
Taylor A. Maximizing the value of responsive load. The Electricity Journal 2012; 25: 6–16.
10.1016/j.tej.2012.08.004 Google Scholar
- 48 Meibom P, Kiviluoma J, Barth R, Brand H, Weber C, Larsen HV. Value of electric heat boilers and heat pumps for wind power integration. Wind Energy 2007; 10: 321–337.
- 49 Wu DW, Wang RZ. Combined cooling, heating and power: a review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2006; 32: 459–495.
- 50 Alanne K, Saari A. Distributed energy generation and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2006; 10: 539–558.
- 51 Al-Sulaiman FA, Hamdullahpur F, Dincer I. Trigeneration: a comprehensive review based on prime movers. International Journal of Energy Research 2011; 35: 233–258.
- 52 Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Exergo-environmental analysis of an integrated organic Rankine cycle for trigeneration. Energy Conversion and Management 2012; 64: 447–453.
- 53 Ahmadi P, Rosen MA, Dincer I. Greenhouse gas emission and exergo-environmental analyses of a trigeneration energy system. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011; 5: 1540–1549.
- 54 Al-Sulaiman FA, Hamdullahpur F, Dincer I. Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production. Renewable Energy 2012; 48: 161–172.
- 55 Ozcan H, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated SOFC, solar ORC and absorption chiller for tri-generation applications. Fuel Cells 2013; 13(5): 781–793.
- 56 Suleman F, Dincer I, Agelin-Chaab M. Development of an integrated renewable energy system for multigeneration. Energy 2014. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.082.
- 57 Ratlamwala T, Dincer I, Gadalla MA. Performance analysis of a novel integrated geothermal-based system for multigeneration applications. Applied Thermal Engineering 2012; 40: 71–79.
- 58 Ratlamwala T, Dincer I, Gadalla MA. Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated geothermal based quadruple effect absorption system for multigenerational purposes. Thermochimica Acta 2012; 535: 27–35.
- 59 Dincer I, Zamfirescu C. Renewable-energy-based multigeneration systems. International Journal of Energy Research 2012; 36: 1403–1415.
- 60 Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Development and assessment of an integrated biomass-based multigeneration energy system. Energy 2013; 56: 155–166.
- 61 Zhang X, Yamaguchi H, Cao Y. Hydrogen production from solar energy powered supercritical cycle using carbon dioxide. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2011; 35: 4925–4932.
- 62 AlZahrani AA, Dincer I, Naterer GF. Performance evaluation of a geothermal based integrated system for power, hydrogen and heat generation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2013; 38: 14505–14511.
- 63 Sack JP, Roeb M, Sattler C, Pitz-Paal R, Heinzel A. Development of a system model for a hydrogen production process on a solar tower. Solar Energy 2012; 86: 99–111.
- 64 Ratlamwala TAH, Dincer I. Performance assessment of solar based integrated Cu–Cl systems for hydrogen production. Solar Energy 2013; 95: 345–356.
- 65 Ozcan H, Dincer I. Energy and exergy analyses of a solar driven Mg–Cl hybrid thermochemical cycle for coproduction of power and hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2014; 39: 15330–15341.
- 66 Wolf J, Yan J. Parametric study of chemical looping combustion for trigeneration of hydrogen, heat, and electrical power with CO2 capture. International Journal of Energy Research 2005; 29: 739–753.
- 67 McGlashan NR. The thermodynamics of chemical looping combustion applied to the hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010; 35: 6465–6474.
- 68 Chen S, Xue Z, Wang D, Xiang W. An integrated system combining chemical looping hydrogen generation process and solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine cycle for power production with CO2 capture. Journal of Power Sources 2012; 215: 89–98.
- 69 Zhang X, Li S, Hong H, Jan H. A hydrogen and oxygen combined cycle with chemical looping combustion. Energy Conversion and Management 2014; 85: 701–708.
- 70 Ozcan H, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis of a combined chemical looping-based trigeneration system. Energy Conversion and Management 2014; 85: 477–487.
- 71 United Nations World Water Assessment Programme. Facts and figures. Website: http://www.unwater.org/water-cooperation-2013/water-cooperation/facts-and-figures/en/ (2013) [accessed 15.11.14].
- 72 Gude VG, Nirmalakhandan N, Deng S. Renewable and sustainable approaches for desalination. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010; 14: 2641–2654.
- 73 Ghosh S, Dincer I. Development and analysis of a new integrated solar-wind-geothermal energy system. Solar Energy 2014; 107: 728–745.
- 74 El-Emam RS, Dincer I. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant with energy recovery. Energy 2014; 64: 154–163.
- 75 Ellabban O, Abu-Rub H, Blaabjerg F. Renewable energy resources: current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014; 39: 748–764.
- 76 Lenzen M. Current state of development of electricity-generating technologies: a literature review. In Integrated Sustainability Analysis. University of Sydney: Sydney, Australia, 2009.
- 77 McGowin C. Renewable energy technical assessment guide. TAG-RE: 2007, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, USA.
- 78 Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), the Pembina Institute. Potential non-air environmental impacts of several conventional power sources. Website: http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/2375-estimating-non-air-environmental-benefits-renewable-power-sources-en.pdf; 2008 [accessed 03/11/2014].
- 79 Aman MM, Solangi KH, Hossain MS, Badarudin A, Jasmon GB, Mokhlis H, Bakar AHA, Kazi SN. A review of Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) issues of solar energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 41: 1190–1204.
- 80 International Energy Agency Technical Report. Combined heat and power. Website: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/chp_report.pdf; 2008 [accessed 15.11.12].
- 81 U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Protection Agency. Combined heat and power - a clean energy solution. Website: http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/clean_energy_solution.pdf [accessed 01.11.2014].
- 82 Srikhirin P, Aphornratana S, Chungpaibulpatana S. A review of absorption refrigeration technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2001; 5: 343–372.
