Volume 49, Issue 7 pp. 1456-1470
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Political and media discourses about integrating refugees in the UK

Simon Goodman

Corresponding Author

Simon Goodman

Coventry University, Coventry, UK

Correspondence

Simon Goodman, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Kirkwood

Steve Kirkwood

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 April 2019
Citations: 32

Abstract

This article addresses political and media discourses about integrating refugees in the UK in the context of the “refugee crisis”. A discursive psychological approach is presented as the best way to understand what talk about the concept is used to accomplish in these debates. A large corpus of political discussions (13 hours of debate featuring 146 politicians) and 960 newspaper articles from the UK were discourse analysed. The analysis identified five dilemmas about integration: Integration is positive and necessary, but challenging; Host communities are presented as welcoming, but there are limits to their capacity; Refugees are responsible for integration, but host communities need to provide support; Good refugees integrate, bad ones don't; Refugees are vulnerable and are skilled. All are used to warrant the inclusion or exclusion of refugees. The responsibility of western nations to support refugees is therefore contingent on the refugees behaving in specific ways.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.