High self-monitors modulate their responses as a function of relevant social roles
Katherine E. Adams
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
James M. Tyler
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
Correspondence
James M. Tyler, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, PSYC 2148, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2081, USA.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorKatherine E. Adams
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
James M. Tyler
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
Correspondence
James M. Tyler, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, PSYC 2148, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2081, USA.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
We reasoned that high self-monitors' responses may be influenced by the characteristic traits and behaviors associated with social roles. Results across four studies confirmed expectations. The findings from Experiments 1, 2, and 3 demonstrated that exposure to a particular role (e.g., nurse) led high self-monitors to respond in a manner consistent with the relevant role. Results from Experiment 4 showed that the effect found in the first three experiments was attenuated when the behavioral guidance of the particular role was reduced. Low self-monitors' responses were not influenced by exposure to the role. Showing that high self-monitors use information embedded in a social role to tailor their behavior provides a novel finding that has heretofore been absent from the literature.
References
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 518–529.
- Berscheid, E., Graziano, W., Monson, T. C., & Dermer, M. (1976). Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 978–989.
- Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Consiglio, C., Picconi, L., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 849–856.
- Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1170–1179.
- Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(4), 225–245.
- Danheiser, P. R., & Graziano, W. G. (1982). Self-monitoring and cooperation as a self-presentational strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(3), 469–497.
- Dardenne, B., & Leyens, J. P. (1995). Confirmation bias as a social skill. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1229–1239.
- DeMarree, K. G., Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Priming a new identity: Self-monitoring moderates the effects of non-selfprimes on self-judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 657–671.
- Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 865–877.
- Douglas, W. (1983). Scripts and self-monitoring: When does being a high self-monitor really make a difference? Human Communication Research, 10(1), 81–96.
- Douglas, W. (1984). Initial interaction scripts: When knowing is behaving. Human Communication Research, 11(2), 203–219.
- Friedman, H. S., & Miller-Herringer, T. (1991). Nonverbal display of emotion in public and in private: Self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 766–775.
- Fuglestad, P. T., & Snyder, M. (2009). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. In M. R. Leary, & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 574–591). New York: Guilford Press.
- Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 530–555.
- Hass, R. G., Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J., & Moore, L. (1992). When racial ambivalence evokes negative affect, using a disguised measure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 786–797.
- Johnson, R. D., & Downing, L. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 1532–1538.
- Rarick, D. L., Soldow, G. F., & Geizer, R. S. (1976). Self-monitoring as a mediator of conformity. Communication Studies, 27(4), 267–271.
- Saleem, M., Anderson, C. A., & Barlett, C. P. (2015). Assessing helping and hurting behaviors through the Tangram help/hurt task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1345–1362.
- Schlenker, B. R. (2003). Self-presentation. In M. R. Leary, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 492–518). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
- Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537.
- Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1980). Thinking about ourselves and others: Self-monitoring and social knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 222–234.
- Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125–139.
- Snyder, M., & Monson, T. C. (1975). Persons, situations, and the control of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 637–644.
- Tyler, J. M., Kearns, P., & McIntyre, M. M. (2016). Effects of self-monitoring on processing of self-presentation information. Social Psychology, 47, 174–178.
- Tyler, J. M., McIntyre, M. M., Graziano, W. G., & Sands, K. J. (2014). High self-monitor's cognitive access to self-presentation related information. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 205–219.
- Wheeler, S. C., Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Think unto others: The self-destructive impact of negative racial stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(2), 173–180.
- Wong, N. Y., & Watkins, D. (1996). Self-monitoring as a mediator of person-environment fit: An investigation of Hong Kong mathematics classroom environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(2), 223–229.
10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01191.x Google Scholar