Research article
Hijab, visibility and the performance of identity
Nick Hopkins,
Ronni Michelle Greenwood,
Corresponding Author
Nick Hopkins
School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
Correspondence to: Nick Hopkins, School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorRonni Michelle Greenwood
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorNick Hopkins,
Ronni Michelle Greenwood,
Corresponding Author
Nick Hopkins
School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
Correspondence to: Nick Hopkins, School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorRonni Michelle Greenwood
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Theories concerning the relationship between social identification and behaviour are increasingly attentive to how group members emphasise or de-emphasise identity-related attributes before particular audiences. Most research on this issue is experimental and explores the expression of identity-related attitudes as a function of participants' beliefs concerning their visibility to different audiences. We extend and complement such research with an analysis of group members' accounts of their identity performances. Specifically, we consider British Muslim women's (n = 22) accounts of wearing hijab (a scarf covering the hair) and how this visible declaration of religious identity is implicated in the performance of their religious, national and gender identities. Our analysis extends social psychological thinking on identity performance in three ways. First, it extends our understandings of the motivations for making an identity visible to others. Second, it sheds light on the complex relationship between the performance of one (e.g. Muslim) identity and the performance of other (e.g. gender/national) identities. Third, it suggests the experience of making an identity visible can facilitate the subsequent performance of that identity. The implications of these points for social identity research on identity performance are discussed. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Amiot, C. E., de la Sablonnière, R., Terry, D. J., Smith, J. R. (2007). Integration of social identities in the self: Toward a cognitive-developmental model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 364–388.
- Anthias, F. (2008). Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: An intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations, 4, 5–20.
- Back, L. (1996). New ethnicities and urban culture: Racisms and multiculture in young lives. London: UCL Press.
-
Barreto, M., &
Ellemers, N. (2003). The effects of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 139–170.
10.1080/10463280340000045 Google Scholar
- Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Scholten, W., & Smith, H. (2010). To be or not to be: The impact of implicit versus explicit inappropriate social categorisations on the self. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 43–67.
- Barreto, M., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Shahinper, K. (2003). Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 299–318.
- Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. The social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73, 1015–1049.
- Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. M. Padilla (Ed.) Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder: Westview Press.
- Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + woman + lesbian ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Braun, V., &
Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google Scholar
- Chen, S., Chen, K. Y., & Shaw, L. (2004). Self-verification motives at the collective level of self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 77–94.
- Cheryan, S., & Monin, B. (2005). Where are you really from? Asian Americans and identity denial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 717–730.
- Cole, D., & Ahmadi, S. (2003). Perspectives and experiences of Muslim women who veil on college campuses. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 47–66.
- Condor, S. (2006). Temporality and collectivity: Diversity, history and the rhetorical construction of national entitativity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 657–682
- Condor, S. (2011). Sense and sensibility: The conversational etiquette of English national self-identification. In, A. Aughey, & C. Berberich (eds) These Englands: A conversation on national identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
-
Corbin Dwyer, S., &
Buckle, J. (2009). The space between: On being an insider–outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 54–63.
10.1177/160940690900800105 Google Scholar
- Droogsma, R. A. (2007). Redefining hijab: American Muslim women's standpoints on veiling. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 294–319.
- Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2000) Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579–604.
-
Dwyer, C. (1999). Veiled meanings: Young British Muslim women and the negotiation of differences. Gender, Place & Culture, 6, 5–26.
10.1080/09663699925123 Google Scholar
- Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.
- Entwistle, J. (2000). The fashioned body: Fashion, dress, and modern social theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Fine, M., &
Sirin, S. R. (2007). Theorizing hyphenated selves: Researching youth development in and across contentious political contexts. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 16–38.
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00032.x Google Scholar
- Franks, M. (2000). Crossing the borders of whiteness? White Muslim women who wear the hijab in Britain today. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 917–929.
-
Gilliat-Ray, S. (1998). Multiculturalism and identity: Their relationship for British Muslims. Journal of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, 18, 347–354.
10.1080/13602009808716416 Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Greenwood, R. M. (2012). Standing at the crossroads of identity: An intersectional approach to women's social identities and political consciousness. In S. Wiley, G. Philogène, & T. A. Revenson (Eds) Social categories in everyday experience (pp. 103–129). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/13488-006 Google Scholar
- Haddad, Y. (2007). The post-9/11 hijab as icon. Sociology of Religion, 68, 253–267.
- Hopkins, P. E. (2007). ‘Blue squares’, ‘proper’ Muslims and transnational networks: Narratives of national and religious identities amongst young Muslim men living in Scotland. Ethnicities, 7, 61–81.
- Hopkins, N. (2011). Dual identities and their recognition: Minority group members' perspectives. Political Psychology, 32, 251–270.
- Hopkins, N., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2004). Identity construction and political activity: Beyond rational actor theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 339–356.
- Hopkins, N., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2009). Reconceptualising “extremism” and “moderation”: From categories of analysis to categories of practice in the construction of collective identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 99–113.
- Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Harrison, K., Cassidy, C., Bull, R., & Levine, M. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 776–788.
- Howarth, C., Wagner, W., Magnusson, N., & Sammut, G. (2013). ‘It's only other people who make me feel Black’: Acculturation, identity and agency in a multicultural community. Political psychology, DOI: 10.1111/pops.12020
- Jacobson, J. (1997). Religion and ethnicity: Dual and alternative sources of identity among young British Pakistanis. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 20, 238–256.
-
Jaspal, R. (2009). ‘Insider’ or ‘outsider’? Conducting qualitative psychological research with British South Asians. PsyPAG Quarterly, 71, 11–17.
10.53841/bpspag.2009.1.71.11 Google Scholar
- Jaspal, R., & Cinnirella, M. (2012). The construction of ethnic identity: Insights from identity process theory. Ethnicities, 12, 503–530.
-
Jenkins, R. (1996) Social identity. London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203292990 Google Scholar
- Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Reacting to impending discrimination: Compensation for prejudice and attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1357–1367.
- Klein, O., & Azzi, A. E. (2001). The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes: How group members attempt to tailor an out-group's representation of themselves. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 279–293.
- Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of the SIDE model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 28–45.
- Maxwell, R. (2006). Muslims, South Asians and the British mainstream: A national identity crisis? West European Politics, 29, 736–756.
- Nielsen, J. (1987). Muslims in Britain: Searching for an identity? New Community, XIII, 384–394.
- O'Neil, M. L. (2000) You are what you wear: Clothing/appearance laws and the construction of the public citizen in Turkey. Fashion Theory, 14, 65–82.
- Peek, L. (2005). Becoming Muslim: The development of a religious identity. Sociology of Religion, 66, 215–242.
- Rafaeli, A., Dutton, J. E., Harquail, C. V., & Lewis, S. (1997). Navigating by attire: The use of dress by female administrative employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 9–45.
- Read, J. G., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2000). To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society, 14, 395–417.
- Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (1994). De-individuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145–163.
- Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.
- Ruby, T. F. (2006). Listening to the voices of hijab. Women's Studies International Forum, 29, 54–66.
- Saeed, A., Blain, N., & Forbes, D. (1999). New ethnic and national questions in Scotland: Post-British identities amongst Glasgow Pakistani teenagers. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 22, 821–844.
- Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301-311.
- Siraj, A. (2011). Meanings of modesty and the hijab amongst Muslim women in Glasgow, Scotland. Gender, Place and Culture, 18, 716–731.
-
Stiles, W. B. (1999). Evaluating qualitative research. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 2, 99–101.
10.1136/ebmh.2.4.99 Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
- Swann, W. B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038–1051.
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Vorauer, J. D. (2006). An information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction. Psychological Review, 113, 862–886.
- Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. (2012). The veil and Muslim women's identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18, 521–541.
- Wakefield, J. H., Hopkins, N., & Greenwood, R. M. (2012). Thanks, but no thanks: Women's avoidance of help-seeking in the context of a dependency-related stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 425–433.
- Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463.
- Werbner, P. (2004). Theorising complex diasporas: Purity and hybridity in the South Asian public sphere in Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30, 895–911.
- Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an analysts' and a participants' resource. In C. Antaki, & S. Widdicombe (Eds.) Identities in talk (pp. 191–206). London: Sage.
- Wiley, S., & Deaux, K. (2011) The bicultural identity performance of immigrants. In A. E. Azzi, X. Chryssochoou, B. Klandermans, & B. Simon (eds.) Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies (pp. 49–68). Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
- Williams, R. H., & Vashi, G. (2007). Hijab and American Muslim women: Creating the space for autonomous selves. Sociology of Religion, 68, 269–287.
- Williamson, M., & Khiabany, G. (2010). UK: The veil and the politics of racism. Race & Class, 52, 85–96.
