Volume 43, Issue 5 pp. 321-325
Fast track report

Counter-prejudicial training reduces activation of biased associations and enhances response monitoring

Jimmy Calanchini

Corresponding Author

Jimmy Calanchini

University of California, Davis, Davis, USA

Correspondence to: Jimmy Calanchini, 134 Young Hall, 1 Shields Ave, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Karen Gonsalkorale

Karen Gonsalkorale

University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey W. Sherman

Jeffrey W. Sherman

University of California, Davis, Davis, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Karl Christoph Klauer

Karl Christoph Klauer

University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 May 2013
Citations: 21

Abstract

Although implicitly measured bias was once assumed to be highly stable, subsequent research has shown that it is, in fact, malleable. One technique for altering implicit bias is through counter-prejudicial training. At least two broad mechanisms may drive this effect. First, training people to respond in counter-prejudicial ways may diminish the extent to which biased associations are activated in memory. Second, training may strengthen processes that reduce the influence of biased associations on responses. Participants received either counter-prejudicial, pro-prejudicial, or no training and then completed an implicit measure of bias. Application of the quadruple process model revealed support for both mechanisms: Counter-prejudicial training produced less activation of biased associations as well as enhanced detection of appropriate responses compared with pro-prejudicial or no training. Implications for the development of bias-reduction training are discussed. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.