Volume 15, Issue 5 e70302
LETTER TO THE JOURNAL
Open Access

Induction of HMOX1 by mesenchymal stem cell cytotherapy inhibits osteoclastogenesis and myeloma-induced bone disease

Xin Li

Xin Li

Department of Internal Medicine, Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University ofArkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Wen Ling

Wen Ling

Department of Internal Medicine, Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University ofArkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bart Barlogie

Bart Barlogie

Department of Internal Medicine, Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University ofArkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Shmuel Yaccoby

Corresponding Author

Shmuel Yaccoby

Department of Internal Medicine, Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University ofArkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Correspondence

Shmuel Yaccoby, Department of Internal Medicine, Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Slot 776, Little Rock, AR 72205.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 May 2025

Dear Editor,

Multiple myeloma (MM) cells typically grow in focal lesions (FLs), which often turn into osteolytic lesions.1 Through the study of cytotherapy with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for treating MM, we discovered that MSCs mediate HMOX1 expression in monocytes to balance differentiation of osteoclast precursors into osteoclasts. Lower expression of HMOX1 in the MM bone is associated with poor outcome and induction of HMOX1 pharmacologically resulted in suppression of MM-induced bone disease.

Previously, we showed that MM-induced osteolytic bone disease can be treated via direct cytotherapy with MSCs using our well-established SCID-hu and SCID-rab MM models2, 3 (see Methods and Discussion in Supplementary Information). By applying global gene expression profiling (GEP) on the whole human bone in SCID-hu mice we found that MSC cytotherapy induced expression of several genes associated with the macrophages and monocytes (Figure 1A, Table S1). Of the top upregulated genes, we focused on HMOX1, which encodes heme oxygenase 1, and known as an inducible factor that mediate oxidative stress, inflammation and bone remodelling.4 HMOX1 expression in bone was consistently upregulated following MSC cytotherapy in bones engrafted with 4 different MM cell lines (Figure 1B and C). Immunohistochemistry post-cytotherapy revealed induction of HMOX1 protein in monocytes and macrophages and some MM cells (Figure 1D). HMOX1 expression is highest among immune cells in MM bone marrow based on publicly available scRNA-seq data (Figure 1E–G).

Details are in the caption following the image
MSC cytotherapy upregulates HMOX1 in the myelomatous human bone, a gene that is highly expressed in cells of monocytic origin. (A–D) MSCs or PBS were injected directly into the implanted human bone in MM-bearing SCID-hu mice. (A) A heat map of the top significantly upregulated (n = 122) and downregulated (n = 44) genes in the whole human bone engrafted with MM cells as assessed at 0 h (n = 9) and 24 h (n =  9) after injection of MSCs. (B) HMOX1 expression in individual samples assessed via gene expression profiling. (C) HMOX1 expression, assessed with qRT-PCR, in myelomatous human bone engrafted with MM cells from 4 different patients. (D) Immunohistochemistry of HMOX1 in myelomatous human bones injected with MSCs or PBS at indicated timepoint (×20 original magnification). MM, multiple myeloma cells; OC, osteoclast; AD, adipocyte; Mo, monocyte. (E–G) scRNA-seq of BM cells from healthy donors and patients with MM (see Methods in Supplementary Information). (E) Expression of HMOX1 among various mononucleated cells. (F, G) Expression of HMOX1 and CD163 within subsets of monocytes/macrophages.

To study whether MSCs mediate osteoclastogenesis through HMOX1, we co-cultured MSCs with osteoclast precursors (pOC) and found that MSCs suppressed their differentiation into multinucleated osteoclasts, an effect that was associated with upregulation of HMOX1 at the RNA and protein levels, lower expression of the osteoclast markers: ACP5 (TRAP), CTSK, and VTNR, and lower secretion of HMGB1 (Figure 2A–G). RANKL is a master regulator of osteoclastogenesis that acts on pOC via TNFRSF11A/RANK. Using qRT-PCR, immunofluorescence and immunoblot we found that MSCs conditioned medium reduced TNFRSF11 expression and RANK levels in pOC (Figure 2H–J). MSCs secreted factors that restrain osteoclastogenesis are discussed in Supplementary Information.

Details are in the caption following the image
MSCs inhibit osteoclast formation, an effect associated with upregulation of HMOX1 and reduced expression of osteoclast genes. The osteoclast precursors (pOC) were cultured alone or cocultured with MSCs in osteoclast medium. (A) Number of mature multinucleated osteoclasts on day 7. (B) HMOX1 expression in pOC at the early phase of osteoclast differentiation (day 2) or later stage (day 7) when osteoclasts (OC) are formed. (C–E) Expression of ACP5 (TRAP), CTSK, and VTNR on day 7. Immunoblot analysis of HMOX1 protein in pOC treated with MSC-conditioned medium (CM) for 2 days. (F) Immunoblot for HMOX1 in pOC cultured in osteoclast medium and treated with indicated concentration of MSC-CM for 2 days. (G) Secreted levels of HMGB1 in cultures as in F, assessed on day 7. (H–J) Osteoclast precursors were cultured alone or cocultured with MSCs in non-contact conditions with osteoclast medium for 2 days. (H) TNFRSF11A expression (encoding RANK), assessed by qRT-PCR. (I) Protein production of RANK, determined via immunoblot. (J) Immunofluorescence staining of osteoclast precursors treated with indicated per cent of MSC-conditioned medium for 2 days. RANK is stained green with FITC-conjugated antibody. Red arrows point to cell surface RANK.

NFκB is induced by RANK/RANKL signalling and is a vital signalling pathway for osteoclastogenesis.5 MSC-conditioned medium inhibited cytoplasmic phosphorylated IκBα and NFκB p65 and nuclear NFκB p65 in pOC (Figure 3A–C).

Details are in the caption following the image
MSCs inhibit the NFκB and NFATC1 transcription factors during osteoclast differentiation while induction of HMOX1 expression inhibits osteoclastogenesis. (A–F) Osteoclast precursors (pOC) cultured in osteoclast medium and treated with fresh medium (CONT) or indicated concentrations of MSC-conditioned medium (CM) for 2 days. (A) The effect of MSC-CM on phosphorylation of IKBα in pOC. (B) The effect of MSC-CM on phosphorylated NFκB p65 (p-NFκB p65) in pOC. (C) The effect of MSC-CM on NFκB p65 activation in the nuclear fraction of pOC. (D) NFATC1 expression in pOC assessed with qRT-PCR in pOC collected on day 2 and day 7. (E) Immunoblot for NFATC1 in pOC performed on day 2. (F–H) Monocytes were infected with lentivirus particles containing empty vector (EV) or HMOX1 cDNA and cultured with osteoclast medium. (F) HMOX1 expression 2 days after injection assessed with qRT-PCR. (G) Number of multinucleated osteoclasts on day 7 in sham, EV, and HOMX1 cDNA samples. (H) Representative photos of multinucleated osteoclasts of sham, EV, and HOMX1 cDNA groups (×20 original magnification). Arrows point to multinucleated osteoclasts. (I–L) Expression of HMOX1, TNFRS11A, and NFATC1 in osteoclast precursors treated with DMSO (control) or hemin (50 µM) for 3 days. (M) Number of TRAP+ multinucleated osteoclasts on day 7. (N) Representative TRAP staining of DMSO and hemin samples on day 7.

NFATC1 is a main downstream transcription factor activated by the RANKL/NFκB pathway in osteoclasts that induces expression of typical genes associated with osteoclasts, such as CTSK and APC5/TRAP.6 Compared to pOC cultured alone, pOC cultured with MSCs had lower expression of NFATC1 (Figure 3D). Immunoblots conducted on pOC confirmed reduced levels of NFATC1 in pOC cocultured with MSCs in a non-contact condition (Figure 3E). Taken together, these data indicate that MSCs downregulate RANK expression in pOC, resulting in reduced activation of the NFκB pathway, leading to lower activity of the main osteoclastic transcription factor, NFATC1.

We applied two different methods to shed light on the direct role of HMOX1 on osteoclast formation. To induce constitutive HMOX1 expression, we infected monocytes with lentiviral particles containing either HMOX1 cDNA or empty vector. Culturing these cells in osteoclast medium for 7 days induced formation of multinucleated osteoclasts in the control groups (i.e., noninfected cells [sham] and cells containing empty vector); in contrast, multinucleated osteoclasts failed to form in cells expressing HMOX1 cDNA (Figure 3F–H).

To further corroborate our finding, we used hemin, a pharmacological agent that induces HMOX1 expression.7 We confirmed by qRT-PCR that treatment of pOC with hemin induced HMOX1 gene expression in these cells (Figure 3I). We also tested expression of the RANKL receptor RANK, encoded by TNFRSF11A, and NFATC1. Both TNFRSF11A and NFATC1 were downregulated in hemin-treated pOC (Figure 3K–M). Treatment with hemin inhibited the formation of multinucleated osteoclasts in pOC continually cultured in osteoclast medium for 7 days (Figure 3M and N). Together, these findings indicate that induced expression of HMOX1 in pOC inhibits pOC differentiation into osteoclasts.

In vivo, we used our well-established SCID-rab model to test the effect of hemin on MM growth and MM-induced bone disease. Specifically, we engrafted a BM-dependent MM line into SCID-rab mice as previously described.8 Upon establishment of MM engraftment, mice were treated with hemin or control vehicle (DMSO) for 4 weeks. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the implanted myelomatous bone was reduced from pretreatment levels by 16% and 1% in the DMSO- and hemin-treated groups, respectively (p  <  .005) (Figure 4A). The X-rays showed more osteolysis and lytic lesions in DMSO-treated bones than in hemin-treated bones (Figure 4B). Although fewer osteoclasts were observed in hemin-treated bones, the number of osteoblasts were equivalent (Figure 4C and D). Further, total tumour burden analysed by circulating hIg ELISA were similar between the two groups (Figure 4E). Thus, these results indicate that hemin, the HMOX1 inducer, inhibited osteoclastogenesis and MM-induced osteolytic lesions in vivo.

Details are in the caption following the image
Induction of HMOX1 by hemin inhibits bone resorption in vivo while lower HMOX1 in clinical biopsies associated with poor outcome. (A–E) MM cells were engrafted in SCID-rab mice and upon establishment of multiple myeloma, were treated with DMSO (control, n  =  9) or hemin (50 µM, n  =  9) both diluted in 500 µL PBS and injected into the surrounding implanted bone twice a week for 4 weeks. (A) Changes in bone mineral density of the implanted bones. (B) Representative X-ray radiographs of the implanted myelomatous bone prior to treatment (Pre-Rx) and at the end of the experiment (Final). (C, D) Numbers of TRAP+ osteoclasts and osteocalcin+ osteoblasts. (E) Levels of human immunoglobulin lambda light chain in blood, indicative of tumour burden. (F–H) Clinical observations. (F) Expression of HMOX1 in bone biopsies from healthy donors, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients (NDMM), and MM patients in remission. (G) Expression of HMOX1 in paired biopsy samples from random BM and focal lesions (FL) of the same patients. (H) Overall survival of patients with NDMM enrolled in the TT3 clinical trial (first 8 years of trial).

To explore the clinical relevance of our findings, we used publicly available GEP data from our institute to analyse expression of HMOX1 in whole bone biopsies from healthy donors (n  =  68), patients with NDMM (n  =  354), and MM patients in remission (n  =  132).9 Consistent with our findings, HMOX1 expression was decreased in whole biopsies of patients with NDMM and returned to normal when patients were in remission (Figure 4F). We also used available data from paired random interstitial bone biopsy and FL biopsy from patients with NDMM (n = 49 patients). HMOX1 expression was lower in FLs than in interstitial bone samples (Figure 4G). Additionally, lower expression of HMOX1 was associated with poor overall survival in patients with NDMM enrolled in a TT3 clinical trial at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (Figure 4H).10 These observations indicate that lower HMOX1 expression in myelomatous bones is markedly suppressed in FLs and that lower expression in interstitial bone marrow is an adverse clinical parameter.

We conclude that MSCs are central in mediating differentiation of osteoclasts through maintaining high expression of HMOX1 in monocytes. Suppression of bone resorption by MSC cytotherapy is partially mediated by induction of HMOX1 in monocytes suggesting that approaches to induce HMOX1 expression may help control MM-induced osteolysis.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

X.L. performed the in vitro and in vivo work, the GEP analysis, immunohistochemistry, immunoblots, qRT-PCR, and statistical analyses; X.L. was also one of the writers of the paper. W.L. performed in vitro and in vivo work and the immunohistochemistry. B.B. interpreted the data and provided clinical insight. S.Y. designed and directed the research, conceptualised the work, analysed and interpreted the data, and was one of the writers of the paper.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Editorial support was provided by the Science Communication Group at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

    The authors declare no competing financial interests.

    FUNDING

    This work was supported by a grant CA55819 (B.B.) from the National Cancer Institute and grant CA200068 (S.Y.) from the US Department of Defense.

    ETHICS STATEMENT

    All animal experimental procedures and protocols were approved by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

    DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    The GEP analyses of bone biopsies from MM patients and healthy donors are available as described by Danziger et al. (2020).9

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.