Abstract
In proposing connections among the paradigms represented by domain theory, parental control theory, and Baumrind's configural approach to parental authority, the worldview of each paradigm must be respected and ambiguities in core concepts must be resolved.
REFERENCES
- Barber, B. K. “Parental Psychological Control: Revisiting a Neglected Construct.” Child Development, 1996, 67(6), 3296–3319.
-
Barber, B. K.
“ Reintroducing Parental Psychological Control.”
In B. K. Barber (ed.),
Intrusive Parenting: How Psychological Control Affects Children and Adolescents.
Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association,
2002.
10.1037/10422-000 Google Scholar
- Barber, B. K., and Harmon, E. L. “ Violating the Self: Parental Psychological Control of Children and Adolescents.” In B. K. Barber (ed.), Intrusive Parenting: How Psychological Control Affects Children and Adolescents. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2002.
- Baumrind, D. “Effects of Authoritative Parental Control on Child Behavior.” Child Development, 1966, 37(4), 887–907.
- Baumrind, D. “Child Care Practices Anteceding Three Patterns of Preschool Behavior.” Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1967, 75(1), 43–88.
- Baumrind, D. “Current Patterns of Parental Authority.” Developmental Psychology Monograph, 1971, 4(1, Pt. 2), 1–103.
-
Baumrind, D.
“The Influence of Parenting Style on Adolescent Competence and Substance Abuse.”
Journal of Early Adolescence,
1991,
11(1),
56–95.
10.1177/0272431691111004 Google Scholar
-
Baumrind, D.
“The Discipline Controversy Revisited.”
Family Relations,
1996,
4(4),
405–414.
10.2307/585170 Google Scholar
- Baumrind, D., and Black, A. E. “Socialization Practices Associated with Dimensions of Competence in Preschool Boys and Girls.” Child Development, 1967, 38(2), 291–327.
- Buri, J. “Parental Authority Questionnaire.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 1991, 57(1), 110–119.
- Darling, N., and Steinberg, L. “Parenting Style as Context: An Integrative Model.” Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113(3), 487–496.
- Galambos, N. L., Barker, E. T., and Almeida, D. M. “Parents Do Matter: Trajectories of Change in Externalizing and Internalizing Problems in Early Adolescence.” Child Development, 2003, 74(2), 578–594.
- Lins-Dyer, T. “ Mexican Adolescents' Perceptions of Parental Control and Academic Achievement: A Social Domain Approach.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2003.
- Maccoby, E. E., and Martin, J. A. “ Socialization in the Context of the Family: Parent-Child Interaction.” In E. M. Hetherington (ed.) and P. H. Mussen (series ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 4: Socialization, Personality, and Social Development. New York: Wiley, 1983.
- Nucci, L. P. “ Morality and the Personal Sphere of Actions.” In E. S. Reed, E. Turiel and T. Brown (eds.), Values and Knowledge. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1996.
- Nucci, L. P., and Smetana, J. G. “Mothers' Concepts of Young Children's Areas of Personal Freedom.” Child Development, 1996, 67(4), 1870–1886.
- Smetana, J. G. “Parenting Styles and Conceptions of Parental Authority.” Child Development, 1995, 66(2), 299–316.
- Sorkhabi, N. The roots of parent-adolescent conflict: Domain of interactions versus form and patterns of parental authority. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, Ga., Apr. 2005.
- Steinberg, L., and Silk, J. S. “ Parenting Adolescents.” In M. H. Bornstein (ed.), The Handbook of Parenting, Vol. 1: Children and Parenting. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 2002.
- Turiel, E. “ The Development of Morality.” In W. Damon (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Social, Emotional and Personality Development. N. Eisenberg (ed.), ( 5th ed.). Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press, 1998.
