Volume 106, Issue 1 pp. 540-549
ORIGINAL ARTICLE - CLINICAL SCIENCE

Dissection Techniques in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Michaella Alexandrou

Michaella Alexandrou

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dimitrios Strepkos

Dimitrios Strepkos

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Pedro E. P. Carvalho

Pedro E. P. Carvalho

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Deniz Mutlu

Deniz Mutlu

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ozgur Selim Ser

Ozgur Selim Ser

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Poommipanit

Paul Poommipanit

University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sevket Gorgulu

Sevket Gorgulu

Biruni University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Dmitrii Khelimskii

Dmitrii Khelimskii

Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute, Novosibirsk, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
Oleg Krestyaninov

Oleg Krestyaninov

Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute, Novosibirsk, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
Yousif Ahmad

Yousif Ahmad

Yale University/Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yasser Jamil

Yasser Jamil

Yale University/Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Khaldoon Alaswad

Khaldoon Alaswad

Henry Ford Cardiovascular Division, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mir B. Basir

Mir B. Basir

Henry Ford Cardiovascular Division, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lorenzo Azzalini

Lorenzo Azzalini

University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kathleen E. Kearney

Kathleen E. Kearney

University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jaikirshan J. Khatri

Jaikirshan J. Khatri

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Laura Young

Laura Young

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ramazan Ozdemir

Ramazan Ozdemir

Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Mahmut Uluganyan

Mahmut Uluganyan

Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Leah M. Raj

Leah M. Raj

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sant Kumar

Sant Kumar

Department of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Olga C. Mastrodemos

Olga C. Mastrodemos

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bavana V. Rangan

Bavana V. Rangan

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sandeep Jalli

Sandeep Jalli

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
M. Nicholas Burke

M. Nicholas Burke

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yader Sandoval

Yader Sandoval

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Corresponding Author

Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence: Emmanouil S. Brilakis ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 May 2025

ABSTRACT

Background

There is limited data on dissection strategies in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Aims

To study the differences in the baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes of antegrade CTO PCIs that used dissection strategies.

Methods

We performed a comparative analysis of antegrade dissection and re-entry CTO PCIs from the PROGRESS-CTO registry from 50 centers (2012−2024). Three dissection strategies were compared: (a) knuckle wiring: knuckle wire(s) without Carlino technique or CrossBoss catheter; (b) the CrossBoss technique: use of the CrossBoss catheter; and (c) the Carlino technique: use of the Carlino technique. In-stent CTO PCIs were excluded from the analysis.

Results

In total, 1575 (74.6%) cases used knuckle wiring, 427 (20.2%) the CrossBoss, and 110 (5.2%) the Carlino technique. Knuckle wiring was the most frequent strategy with increasing utilization over time (p < 0.001). The CrossBoss catheter was more common in lesions with lower J-CTO scores (CrossBoss: 2.91 vs. Knuckle wiring: 3.07 vs. Carlino: 3.18; p = 0.015), and was associated with higher technical success (CrossBoss: 84.0% vs. Knuckle wiring: 74.2% vs. Carlino: 64.2%; p < 0.001) and similar major adverse cardiac events rates, but lower perforation rates. Time to crossing was longer when Carlino was used (CrossBoss: 93 [70, 133] min vs. Knuckle wiring: 97 [63, 136] min vs. Carlino: 133 [84, 166] min, p = 0.001). Use of different types of knuckle wires (Pilot 200, Gladius Mongo, and Fielder XT) was associated with similar success rates.

Conclusions

Knuckle wiring is the most commonly used antegrade dissection strategy. The CrossBoss catheter was used in less complex cases and was associated with higher success, whereas the opposite was true for the Carlino technique.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Lorenzo Azzalini received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare, Reflow Medical, Shockwave, and Cardiovascular Systems Inc.; received a research grant by Abiomed; serves on the advisory board of Abiomed and GE Healthcare; and owns equity in Reflow Medical. Dr. Emmanouil S. Brilakis: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), Cordis, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, Haemonetics, IMDS, Medtronic, SIS Medical, Teleflex, and Orbus Neich; research support: Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; owner, Hippocrates LLC; shareholder: LifeLens Technologies Inc., MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical, TrueVue Inc. Dr. Yader Sandoval: Abbott (consultant, advisory board), Roche Diagnostics (consultant, advisory board, speaker), Philips (consultant, advisory board, speaker), Zoll (advisory board), GE Healthcare (consultant, advisory board), CathWorks (consultant), HeartFlow (speaker), Cleerly (speaker, research grant). He is an associate editor for JACC Advances. He and others hold patent 20210401347. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.