Volume 98, Issue 7 pp. 1363-1372
PVD - Peripheral Vascular Disease

Development and validation of a predictive model for bleeding after peripheral vascular intervention: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Peripheral Vascular Interventions Registry

Adam C. Salisbury MD, MSc

Corresponding Author

Adam C. Salisbury MD, MSc

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Correspondence

Adam C. Salisbury, Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, 4401 Wornall Road, CV Research 9th Floor, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
David M. Safley MD

David M. Safley MD

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin F. Kennedy MS

Kevin F. Kennedy MS

Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bhaskar Bhardwaj MD

Bhaskar Bhardwaj MD

University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Herbert D. Aronow MD, MPH

Herbert D. Aronow MD, MPH

Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode, USA

Search for more papers by this author
William Schuyler Jones MD

William Schuyler Jones MD

Division of Cardiology, Duke Heart Center, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dmitriy N. Feldman MD

Dmitriy N. Feldman MD

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Secemsky MD, MSc

Eric Secemsky MD, MSc

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas T. Tsai MD, Msc

Thomas T. Tsai MD, Msc

University of Colorado Institute for Health Research and Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robert R. Attaran MBBS

Robert R. Attaran MBBS

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Search for more papers by this author
John A. Spertus MD, MPH

John A. Spertus MD, MPH

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 September 2021
Citations: 3

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a model to predict risk of in-hospital bleeding following endovascular peripheral vascular intervention.

Background

Peri-procedural bleeding is a common, potentially preventable complication of catheter-based peripheral vascular procedures and is associated with increased mortality. We used the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Peripheral Vascular Interventions (PVI) Registry to develop a novel risk-prediction model to identify patients who may derive the greatest benefit from application of strategies to prevent bleeding.

Methods

We examined all patients undergoing lower extremity PVI at 76 NCDR PVI hospitals from 2014 to 2017. Patients with acute limb ischemia (n = 1600) were excluded. Major bleeding was defined as overt bleeding with a hemoglobin (Hb) drop of ≥ 3 g/dl, any Hb decline of ≥ 4 g/dl, or a blood transfusion in patients with pre-procedure Hb ≥ 8 g/dl. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a risk model to predict major bleeding. Model validation was performed using 1000 bootstrapped replicates of the population after sampling with replacement.

Results

Among 25,382 eligible patients, 1017 (4.0%) developed major bleeding. Predictors of bleeding included age, female sex, critical limb ischemia, non-femoral access, prior heart failure, and pre-procedure hemoglobin. The model demonstrated good discrimination (optimism corrected c-statistic = 0.67), calibration (corrected slope = 0.98, intercept of −0.04) and range of predicted risk (1%–18%).

Conclusions

Post-procedural PVI bleeding risk can be predicted based upon pre- and peri-procedural patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to determine whether this model can be utilized to improve procedural safety through developing and targeting bleeding avoidance strategies.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

AC Salisbury: none. D Safley: None. HD Aronow: None. KF Kennedy: None. WS Jones: Research Grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, AstraZeneca, American Heart Association, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Merck, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Honoraria/other from the American College of Physicians, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. DN Feldman: None. E Secemsky: Research grants from NIH/NHLBI K23HL150290, Harvard Medical School's Shore Faculty Development Award, AstraZeneca, BD, Boston Scientific, Cook, CSI, Medtronic, Philips. He discloses consulting or speaking fees from Abbott, Bayer, BD, Boston Scientific, Cook, CSI, Inari, Janssen, Medtronic, Philips, and Venture Medical. TT Tsai: None. RR Attaran: None. JA Spertus: Related to this research, Dr. Spertus is the PI of a Data Analytic Center supported by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Unrelated to this work, he discloses consulting services on the use of patient-reported outcomes for Amgen, Bayer, Myokardia, Merck, and Novartis. He also receives consulting fees for health services research from AstraZeneca, serves on a Scientific Advisory Board for United Healthcare and on the Board of Directors for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas City. He owns the copyrights to the SAQ, KCCQ and PAQ and has an equity interest in Health Outcomes Sciences.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Research data are not shared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.