Early assessment of infarct size and prediction of functional recovery by quantitative myocardial blush grade in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated according to current guidelines†
Nina Riedle MS
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHartmut Dickhaus PhD
Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMarkus Erbacher MSC
Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHenning Steen MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Andrassy MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorDirk Lossnitzer MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorStefan Hardt MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorWolfgang Rottbauer MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorChristian Zugck MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorEvangelos Giannitsis MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHugo A. Katus MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Grigorios Korosoglou MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
University of Heidelberg, Department of Cardiology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, 69120, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorNina Riedle MS
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHartmut Dickhaus PhD
Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMarkus Erbacher MSC
Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHenning Steen MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Andrassy MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorDirk Lossnitzer MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorStefan Hardt MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorWolfgang Rottbauer MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorChristian Zugck MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorEvangelos Giannitsis MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHugo A. Katus MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Grigorios Korosoglou MD
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
University of Heidelberg, Department of Cardiology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, 69120, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorConflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether quantification of myocardial blush grade (MBG) during cardiac catheterization can aid the determination of follow-up left ventricular (LV)-function in patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI). Methods: We prospectively examined patients with first STEMI (n = 46) and NSTEMI (n = 49). ECG-gated angiographic series were used to quantify MBG by analyzing the time course of contrast agent intensity rise. Hereby, the parameter Gmax/Tmax was calculated, derived from the plateau of grey-level intensity (Gmax), divided by the time-to-peak intensity (Tmax). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) deemed as the standard reference for the estimation of infarct size, transmurality and of the LV-function at 6 months of follow-up. Results: Cut-off values of Gmax/Tmax=5.7/sec and 3.8/sec, respectively, yielded similar accuracy as infarct transmurality for the prediction of follow-up ejection fraction >55% (AUC = 0.86 for STEMI and AUC = 0.90 for NSTEMI, by Gmax/Tmax and AUC = 0.85 for STEMI and AUC = 0.89 for NSTEMI, by infarct transmurality, respectively, P = NS). Both clearly surpassed the predictive value of visual MBG (AUC = 0.69 for STEMI and AUC = 0.68 for NSTEMI, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Gmax/Tmax is an easy to acquire but highly valuable surrogate parameter for infarct size, which yields equally high accuracy with infarct transmurality and favorably compares with visually assessed blush grades for the prediction of follow-up LV-function in patients with acute ischemic syndromes. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Harrison JK, Califf RM, Woodlief LH, Kereiakes D, George BS, Stack RS, Ellis SG, Lee KL, O'Neill W, Topol EJ. Systolic left ventricular function after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Analysis of determinants of improvement. The TAMI Study Group. Circulation 1993; 87: 1531–1541.
- 2 Zijlstra F, Patel A, Jones M, Grines CL, Ellis S, Garcia E, Grinfeld L, Gibbons RJ, Ribeiro EE, Ribichini F, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with early (<2 h), intermediate (2–4 h) and late (>4 h) presentation treated by primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 550–557.
- 3 Ito H, Okamura A, Iwakura K, Masuyama T, Hori M, Takiuchi S, Negoro S, Nakatsuchi Y, Taniyama Y, Higashino Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion patterns related to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction perfusion grades after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93: 1993–1999.
- 4 Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, Becker LC, Sorensen SG, Menlove RL. TIMI perfusion grade 3 but not grade 2 results in improved outcome after thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. Ventriculographic, enzymatic, and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-3 Study. Circulation 1993; 87: 1829–1839.
- 5 Lepper W, Hoffmann R, Kamp O, Franke A, de Cock CC, Kuhl HP, Sieswerda GT, Dahl J, Janssens U, Voci P, et al. Assessment of myocardial reperfusion by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow reserve after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [correction of angiography] in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000; 101: 2368–2374.
- 6 Costantini CO, Stone GW, Mehran R, Aymong E, Grines CL, Cox DA, Stuckey T, Turco M, Gersh BJ, Tcheng JE, et al. Frequency, correlates, and clinical implications of myocardial perfusion after primary angioplasty and stenting, with and without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 305–312.
- 7 Karha J, Exaire JE, Rajagopal V, Ivanc TB, Kapadia SR, Ellis SG, Brener SJ. Relation of myocardial perfusion to mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 980–982.
- 8 van 't Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation 1998; 97: 2302–2306.
- 9 Korosoglou G, Dickhaus H, Katus HA. Quantitative automated assessment of myocardial perfusion at cardiac catheterization: The need for validation. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 895–896.
- 10 Korosoglou G, Haars A, Michael G, Erbacher M, Hardt S, Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Franz-Josef N, Dickhaus H, Katus HA, et al. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial blush to assess tissue level reperfusion in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Incremental prognostic value compared with visual assessment. Am Heart J 2007; 153: 612–620.
- 11 Vogelzang M, Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, Amo D, Nijsten MW, Zijlstra F. Computer-assisted myocardial blush quantification after percutaneous coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: A substudy from the TAPAS trial. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 594–599.
- 12 Boyle AJ, Schuleri KH, Lienard J, Vaillant R, Chan MY, Zimmet JM, Mazhari R, Centola M, Feigenbaum G, Dib J, et al. Quantitative automated assessment of myocardial perfusion at cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 980–987.
- 13 Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, Borer J, Cohen LS, Dalen J, Dodge HT, Francis CK, Hillis D, Ludbrook P, et al. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial, phase I. A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987; 76: 142–154.
- 14 The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1615–1622.
- 15 Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, van 't Hof AW, de Boer MJ, Dambrink JH, Gosselink M, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H. Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade. Circulation 2003; 107: 2115–2119.
- 16 Dickhaus H, Erbacher M, Kucherer H. Quantification of myocardial perfusion for CAD diagnosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129 ( Part 2): 1339–1343.
- 17 Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT Jr, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Raymond L, Fortin T, Poole WK, et al. TIMI frame count: A quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996; 93: 879–888.
- 18 Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1445–1453.
- 19 Califf RM, O'Neil W, Stack RS, Aronson L, Mark DB, Mantell S, George BS, Candela RJ, Kereiakes DJ, Abbottsmith C, et al. Failure of simple clinical measurements to predict perfusion status after intravenous thrombolysis. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 658–662.
- 20 Korosoglou G, Labadze N, Giannitsis E, Bekeredjian R, Hansen A, Hardt SE, Selter C, Kranzhoefer R, Katus H, Kuecherer H. Usefulness of real-time myocardial perfusion imaging to evaluate tissue level reperfusion in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 1033–1038.
- 21 Gibson CM, Kirtane AJ, Morrow DA, Palabrica TM, Murphy SA, Stone PH, Scirica BM, Jennings LK, Herrmann HC, Cohen DJ, et al. Association between thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade, biomarkers, and clinical outcomes among patients with moderate- to high-risk acute coronary syndromes: Observations from the randomized trial to evaluate the relative PROTECTion against post-PCI microvascular dysfunction and post-PCI ischemia among antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 30 (PROTECT-TIMI 30). Am Heart J 2006; 152: 756–761.
- 22 Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Ryan KA, Mesley R, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Van De Werf F, Braunwald E. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation 2000; 101: 125–130.
- 23 Gibson CM, de Lemos JA, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, Dauterman KW, Michaels A, Barron HV, Antman EM. Methodologic and clinical validation of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade in acute myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2002; 14: 233–237.
- 24 Steen H, Giannitsis E, Futterer S, Merten C, Juenger C, Katus HA. Cardiac troponin T at 96 hours after acute myocardial infarction correlates with infarct size and cardiac function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2192–2194.
- 25 Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, Wentland AL, Garrett AL, Garrett RW, Djamali A. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: Risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007; 243: 148–157.