Volume 67, Issue 4 pp. 589-594
Coronary Artery Disease

Comparison of the effectiveness of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for small coronary artery lesions

Kyoung-Ha Park MD

Kyoung-Ha Park MD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Seong-Wook Park MD, PhD

Seong-Wook Park MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Myeong-Ki Hong MD, PhD

Myeong-Ki Hong MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Young-Hak Kim MD, PhD

Young-Hak Kim MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Bong-Ki Lee MD

Bong-Ki Lee MD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Duk-Woo Park MD

Duk-Woo Park MD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Bong-Ryong Choi MD

Bong-Ryong Choi MD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Mi-Jeong Kim MD

Mi-Jeong Kim MD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Kyoung-Min Park MD

Kyoung-Min Park MD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Cheol Whan Lee MD, PhD

Cheol Whan Lee MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Gang Neung, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Sang-Sig Cheong MD, PhD

Sang-Sig Cheong MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Gang Neung, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Jae-Joong Kim MD, PhD

Jae-Joong Kim MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Seung-Jung Park MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Seung-Jung Park MD, PhD

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, KoreaSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 17 March 2006
Citations: 17

Abstract

Background: The sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) reduce restenosis in small coronary artery lesions. However, it is not clear which of these stents is superior in terms of clinical outcomes. Methods: The authors retrospectively examined 197 patients with 245 de novo small coronary artery lesions (≤≤2.75 mm) that were treated with either the SES (156 lesions) or the PES (89 lesions). Six-month angiographic restenosis rates and the 9-month target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were compared between the two groups. Results: In terms of baseline clinical and angiographic parameters, the two groups well matched together. Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed on 170 patients (86.3%), comprising 135 SES lesions (86.5%) and 76 PES lesions (85.4%). At 6-month angiographic follow-up, the late lumen loss was less in the SES group than in the PES group (0.29 ± 0.42 vs. 0.69 ± 0.63 mm, P < 0.01). Therefore, the SES group showed a lower rate of angiographic restenosis than the PES group (6.7% vs. 27.7%, P < 0.01). At 9 months there were no deaths or myocardial infarctions in either group. The 9-month TLR rate was lower in the SES group than in the PES group (3.3% vs. 14.4%, P < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from TLR at 9 months was 96.7% for the SES patients and 86.5% for the PES patients (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The SES treatment may be superior to the PES treatment in terms of long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with small coronary artery lesions. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.