Volume 56, Issue 3 pp. 346-352
Original Study

Percutaneous interventions in patients with cocaine-associated myocardial infarction: A case series and review

Arvind K. Sharma MD

Corresponding Author

Arvind K. Sharma MD

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C

Section of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW, Washington, DC 20010Search for more papers by this author
Shadi M. Hamwi MD

Shadi M. Hamwi MD

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C

Search for more papers by this author
Nidhi Garg MD

Nidhi Garg MD

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C

Search for more papers by this author
Marco T. Castagna MD

Marco T. Castagna MD

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C

Search for more papers by this author
William Suddath MD

William Suddath MD

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C

Search for more papers by this author
Samer Ellahham MD

Samer Ellahham MD

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph Lindsay MD

Joseph Lindsay MD

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 June 2002
Citations: 21

Abstract

Cocaine-associated myocardial infarction (CAMI) is a well-reported entity. Most previous reports on CAMI have been limited to conservative care utilizing benzodiazepines, aspirin, nitroglycerin, calcium channel blockers, and thrombolytics. Current guidelines on CAMI advocate immediate use of angiography and angioplasty if available rather than routine administration of thrombolytics. However, based on literature search from 1966 to 2001 (using keywords “cocaine,” “myocardial infarction,” and “angioplasty”), there have been only two case reports of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with cocaine-associated myocardial infarction. Both were notable for complications either during or immediately after the procedure. We report a series of 10 patients with cocaine-associated myocardial infarction who were treated with percutaneous interventions, which included angioplasty, stenting, and AngioJet mechanical extraction of thrombus. Despite the different arteriopathic process involved, our findings suggest that PCI can be performed safely and with a high degree of procedural success in patients with CAMI. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;56:346–352. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.