Composite polymeric microsponge-based long-acting gel formulation for topical delivery of mupirocin
Ghayal Sachin Ramesh
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Contribution: Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Writing - original draft (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorNazir Hussain
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Contribution: Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (supporting), Writing - original draft (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorSubhadeep Roy
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Contribution: Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Santanu Kaity
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Correspondence
Santanu Kaity, Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal 700054, India.
Email: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Funding acquisition (lead), Project administration (lead), Resources (lead), Supervision (lead), Visualization (lead), Writing - review & editing (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorGhayal Sachin Ramesh
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Contribution: Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Writing - original draft (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorNazir Hussain
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Contribution: Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (supporting), Writing - original draft (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorSubhadeep Roy
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Contribution: Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Santanu Kaity
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Correspondence
Santanu Kaity, Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal 700054, India.
Email: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Funding acquisition (lead), Project administration (lead), Resources (lead), Supervision (lead), Visualization (lead), Writing - review & editing (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Topical delivery of medicaments in a controlled manner is still a promising area of research. Drug-containing dammar gum-ethyl cellulose composite microsponge loaded gel formulation (D-MSPG) was developed for controlled topical delivery of mupirocin. The drug-loaded microsponges (D-MSPs) were formulated by the quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion method and were evaluated for morphology, particle size distribution, entrapment efficiency, thermal properties, and crystallinity. The optimized D-MSPs (entrapment efficiency 91.5 ± 4.0% and particle size of 55.15 ± 2.9 μm) were dispersed in carbopol 934 gel (D-MSPG). The final product was characterized for pH, viscosity, texture, spreadability, consistency, syneresis, in vitro drug release, and ex vivo skin penetration study. A comparative study with marketed formulation was performed. For optimized gel formulation (G4), drug content was 104.19 ± 1.68%, and drug release was 84.19% after 24 h. The pH of the optimized gel was observed to be 6.05 ± 0.04. Viscosity of the optimized gel formulation was found to be 1212.15 ± 434.85 mPa-s at 50 s−1. The steady-state flux (J) in ex vivo skin permeation was observed to be 53.96 μg cm−2 h−1 and the permeability coefficient was 2.69 cm/h for the optimized gel formulation. According to the findings, the D-MSPG-based formulation strategy can act well to prolong the topical delivery of mupirocin or similar drug molecules.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
No conflict of interest to declare.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
app54975-sup-0001-Supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 598.5 KB | Figure S1. Particle size distribution for optimized D-MSPs formulation Figure S2. Antimicrobial study of dammar gum and drug excipient mixture |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1G. Han, R. Ceilley, Adv. Ther. 2017, 34, 599.
- 2R. J. White, R. Cooper, A. Kingsley, Br. J. Nurs. 2013, 10, 563.
10.12968/bjon.2001.10.9.9387 Google Scholar
- 3C. F. Heal, J. L. Banks, P. D. Lepper, E. Kontopantelis, M. L. van Driel, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 2016, CD011426.
- 4A. H. Werner, A. D. Russell, Vet. Dermatol. 1999, 10, 225.
- 5M. C. Layton, J. E. Patterson, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 1664.
- 6S. Perumal, S. K. Ramadass, B. Madhan, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 52, 26.
- 7B. Alhasso, M. U. Ghori, B. R. Conway, Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2387.
- 8A. Zaid Alkilani, R. Hamed, H. Abdo, L. Swellmeen, H. A. Basheer, W. Wahdan, A. D. Abu Kwiak, ACS Omega 2022, 7, 39782.
- 9K. Karthikeyan, R. S. Sowjanya, A. D. V. Yugandhar, S. Gopinath, P. S. Korrapati, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 52420.
- 10N. Amrutiya, A. Bajaj, M. Madan, AAPS PharmSciTech 2009, 10, 402.
- 11N. Patel, N. Padia, N. Vadgama, M. Raval, N. Sheth, J. Pharm. Investig. 2016, 46, 221.
- 12M. V. Junqueira, M. L. Bruschi, AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 1501.
- 13C. Bothiraja, A. D. Gholap, K. S. Shaikh, A. P. Pawar, Investigation of Ethyl Cellulose Microsponge Gel for Topical Delivery of Eberconazole Nitrate for Fungal Therapy. 2014, 5, 781.
- 14N. Mulyono, B. W. Lay, M. Wahyuningjati, Exploration of Flesh Dammar (Shorea Leprosula Miq) and Cat Eye Dammar (Shorea Javanica K.Et.V.), As Antibacterial Agent. 2013, 3, 1.
- 15A. Tiwari, V. Tiwari, B. Palaria, M. Kumar, D. Kaushik, Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 8, 1.
10.1186/s43094-021-00395-0 Google Scholar
- 16S. Pradhan, Int. J. Res. Pharm. Chem. 2011, 1, 243.
- 17A. Sharma, K. Guarve, R. Singh, Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2021, 14, 6295.
10.52711/0974-360X.2021.01089 Google Scholar
- 18U. Hani, R. A. M. Osmani, A. Alqahtani, M. Ghazwani, M. Rahamathulla, S. A. Almordy, H. A. Alsaleh, J. Pharm. Innov. 2021, 16, 528.
- 19P. M. Kumar, A. Ghosh, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 96, 243.
- 20R. L. Nagula, S. Wairkar, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 717.
- 21S. Srinivas, K. Kamal, S. Bojja, P. K. Sahoo, S. S. Kalyan Kamal, T. Jagadeesh Kumar, B. Sreedhar, A. K. Singh, S. K. Srivastava, Researchgate.Net 2009, 59, 447.
- 22S. Ahmad, M. Usman Minhas, M. Ahmad, M. Sohail, O. Abdullah, K. U. Khan, Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 3401.
- 23K. F. Abdalla, M. A. Osman, A. T. Nouh, G. M. El Maghraby, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 65, 65.
- 24A. U. Ali, A. Mortada, M. A. Safwat, T. H. El-Faham, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 64, 102583.
- 25Y. He, K. Majid, M. Maqbool, T. Hussain, A. M. Yousaf, I. U. Khan, Y. Mehmood, A. Aleem, M. S. Arshad, A. Younus, J. S. Nirwan, M. U. Ghori, S. A. A. Rizvi, Y. Shahzad, Saudi Pharma. J. 2020, 28, 994.
- 26Y. G. Bachhav, V. B. Patravale, Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 365, 175.
- 27A. Pintea, R. A. Vlad, P. Antonoaea, E. M. Rédai, N. Todoran, E. C. Barabás, A. Ciurba, Polymers 2022, 14, 5011.
- 28M. Haghighi, K. Rezaei, Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 1.
10.1100/2012/967407 Google Scholar
- 29V. C. Patole, S. P. Chaudhari, J. Pharm. Innov. 2021, 16, 408.
- 30M. S. Olivella, L. Lhez, N. B. Pappano, N. B. Debattista, Effects of Dimethylformamide and L-Menthol Permeation Enhancers on Transdermal Delivery of Quercetin. 2008, 12, 481.
- 31B. Brodin, B. Steffansen, C. Nielsen, Molecular biopharmaceutics: Aspects of drug characterisation, drug delivery and dosage form evaluation (Eds: B. Steffansen, B. Brodin, C. Uhd. Nielsen), Pharmaceutical Press, London 2010.
- 32A. Saadatzadeh, A. Salimi, M. Zarooni, Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 242.
10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i7.24162 Google Scholar
- 33G. Wadhwa, S. Kumar, V. Mittal, R. Rao, J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 27, 60.
- 34A. B. Nair, M. Telsang, R. A. Osmani, Polymers (Basel) 2021, 13, 3623.
10.3390/polym13213623 Google Scholar
- 35S. K. Jain, M. Kaur, P. Kalyani, A. Mehra, N. Kaur, N. Panchal, J. Microencapsul. 2019, 36, 677.
- 36S. Maiti, S. Kaity, S. Ray, B. Sa, Acta Pharma. 2011, 61, 257.
- 37S. Kaity, S. Maiti, A. K. Ghosh, D. Pal, A. Ghosh, S. Banerjee, J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2010, 1, 283.
- 38N. D. Gidde, K. A. Karande, S. S. Jadhav, R. S. Mistry, P. A. Mhetre, S. D. Joshi, J. Univ. Shanghai Sci. Technol. 2021, 23, 671.
10.51201/JUSST/21/11949 Google Scholar
- 39B. Alhasso, M. U. Ghori, B. R. Conway, Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 378.
- 40V. Verma, D. Kaushik, Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2020, 54, 637.
- 41M. Najm, M. Rawas-Qalaji, N. Assar, R. Yahia, R. E. Hosary, I. S. Ahmed, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 176, 106251.
- 42P. Parida, S. C. Mishra, S. Sahoo, A. Behera, B. P. Nayak, J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 341.
- 43R. Aiyalu, A. Govindarjan, A. Ramasamy, Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 52, 493.
- 44A. Tiwari, P. Bag, M. Sarkar, V. Chawla, P. A. Chawla, Environ. Anal. Health Toxicol. 2021, 36, 1.
10.5620/eaht.2021001 Google Scholar
- 45N. Kis, M. Gunnarsson, S. Berkó, E. Sparr, J. Control. Release 2022, 343, 755.
- 46M. Lukić, I. Pantelić, S. D. Savić, Cosmetics 2021, 8, 69.
- 47T. Schmitt, R. H. H. Neubert, Chem. Phys. Lipids 2018, 216, 91.
- 48A. Moin, T. Deb, R. A. Osmani, R. R. Bhosale, U. Hani, J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2016, 7, 39.
- 49J. F. Douglas, Gels 2018, 4, 19.
- 50L. Z. Rogovina, V. G. Vasil'ev, E. E. Braudo, Polym. Sci. Ser. C 2008, 50, 85.
- 51V. Pande, S. Patel, V. Patil, R. Sonawane, Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 4, 121.
- 52J. Hurler, A. Engesland, B. Poorahmary Kermany, N. Škalko-Basnet, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, 180.
- 53M. R. Patel, R. B. Patel, J. R. Parikh, B. G. Patel, Appl. Nanosci. (Switzerland) 2016, 6, 539.
- 54R. Kumar, M. Patil, S. Patil, M. Paschapur, Int. J. Pharmtech. Res. 2009, 1, 695.
- 55A. Slavov, C. Garnier, M. J. Crépeau, S. Durand, J. F. Thibault, E. Bonnin, Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 77, 876.
- 56D. Sahoo, V. K. Singh, K. Agrahari, K. U. Kumari, S. Luqman, A. Savita, H. Gupta, P. K. Rout, N. P. Yadav, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 86, 104585.
- 57M. X. Chen, K. S. Alexander, G. Baki, J. Pharm. (Cairo) 2016, 2016, 5754349.
- 58D. Bandyopadhyay, Indian J. Dermatol. 2021, 66, 117.
- 59J. Hurler, K. K. Sørensen, A. Fallarero, P. Vuorela, N. Škalko-Basnet, Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 1.
- 60K. Navyasri, S. Kathirvel, Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2020, 13, 7.
10.20902/IJPTR.2019.130202 Google Scholar
- 61I. Dimitrovska, T. Olumceva, E. Markova, M. Kostoska, L. Taneska, M. Petrushevska, V. Makrievski, J. Todorov, D. Shalabalija, L. Mihailova, R. Popeski Dimovski, M. Glavas Dodov, M. Simonoska Crcarevska, Cellulose 2020, 27, 7109.
- 62R. Sharma, N. Kumar, S. P. Singh, S. Kumar, R. Rao, Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2020, 21, 341.
- 63A. Khattab, A. Nattouf, Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1.