Volume 101, Issue 5 pp. 3422-3429

Effect of charge density, molecular weight, and hydrophobicity on polycations adsorption and flocculation of polystyrene latices and silica

S. Schwarz

Corresponding Author

S. Schwarz

Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany

Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany===Search for more papers by this author
S. Bratskaya

S. Bratskaya

Institute of Chemistry, Far East Department of Russian Academy of Sciences, 159, Prosp. 100-letiya Vladivostoka, Vladivostok 690022, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
W. Jaeger

W. Jaeger

Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymerforschung, Geiselbergstr. 69, 14476 Golm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
B.-R. Paulke

B.-R. Paulke

Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymerforschung, Geiselbergstr. 69, 14476 Golm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 June 2006
Citations: 38

Abstract

Adsorption and flocculation behavior of two series of synthetic polycations was investigated in dispersions of silica and polystyrene latices with various particle size and surface charge densities. Polycations of the first series (polydiallyldimethyl ammonium chloride-PDADMAC) varied in molecular weight only, while polycations of the second series (derivatives of polymethacrylic acid) varied in both molecular weight and hydrophobicity. We have found that maximum adsorbed amount of high molecular weight PDADMAC on latex particles was nearly independent of the surface charge density when the particle size was comparable to the polymer coil dimensions in solution. Both low and high molecular weight PDADMACs were efficient flocculants, although significantly lower amounts of high molecular weight polyelectrolyte were required for the phase separation in the dispersions due to particles aggregation through “charge patch” mechanism. The increase of polymer hydrophobicity leads to higher adsorbed amounts and broadening of flocculation window by polycations of the second series on both substrates. However, no strong enhancement of segment–surface interactions on hydrophobic substrates was observed. Since formation of multilayers upon adsorption was also excluded, the difference in adsorption and flocculation behavior was related to the more compact conformation of hydrophobically associating derivatives in solution and at the interface. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 3422–3429, 2006

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.