Synthesis of nano-sized magnetite mesoporous carbon for removal of Reactive Yellow dye from aqueous solutions
Sanaz Toutounchi
Department of Chemistry, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shahab Shariati
Department of Chemistry, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
Correspondence
Shahab Shariati, Department of Chemistry, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University. Rasht, Iran.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorKazem Mahanpoor
Department of Chemistry, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorSanaz Toutounchi
Department of Chemistry, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shahab Shariati
Department of Chemistry, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
Correspondence
Shahab Shariati, Department of Chemistry, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University. Rasht, Iran.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorKazem Mahanpoor
Department of Chemistry, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this study, core-shell structures of magnetite nanoparticles coated with CMK-8 ordered mesoporous carbon (Fe3O4@SiO2-CMK-8 NPs) have been successfully synthesized for the first time by carbonizing sucrose inside the pores of the Kit-6 mesoporous silica. The nano-sized mesoporous particles were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope, dynamic light scattering, vibrating-sample magnetometer, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and transmission electron microscopy instruments. The obtained nanocomposite was used for removal of Reactive Yellow 160 (RY 160) dye from aqueous samples. The N2 adsorption–desorption method (at 77 K) confirmed the mesoporous structure of synthesized Fe3O4@SiO2-CMK-8 NPs. Also, the surface area was calculated by the BET method and Langmuir plot as 276.84 m2/g and 352.32 m2/g, respectively. The surface area, volume and pore diameter of synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) were calculated from the pore size distribution curves using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda formula (BJH). To obtain the optimum experimental variables, the effect of various experimental parameters on the dye removal efficiency was studied using Taguchi orthogonal array experimental design method. According to the experimental results, about 90.0% of RY 160 was removed from aqueous solutions at the adsorbent amount of 0.06 g, pH 3 and ionic strength = 0.05 m during 10 min. The pseudo-second order kinetic model provided a very good fit for the RY 160 dye removal (R2 = 0.999). The Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich models were applied to describe the equilibrium isotherms, and the Langmuir isotherm showed the best fit to data with the maximum adsorption capacity of 62.893 mg/g. Furthermore, the Fe3O4@SiO2-CMK-8 NPs could be simply recovered by external magnet, and exhibited recyclability and reusability for a subsequent six runs.
REFERENCES
- 1S. Benkaddour, R. Slimani, H. Hiyane, I. Ouahabi, I. Hachoumi, S. El Antri, S. Lazar, Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2018, 10, 16.
- 2S. Sobhanardakani, R. Zandipak, R. Sahraei, Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2013, 95, 909.
- 3R. Zandipak, S. Sobhanardakani, Desalin Water Treat. 2016, 57, 11 348.
- 4M. H. Dehghani, A. Naghizadeh, A. Rashidi, E. Derakhshani, Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51, 7655.
- 5H. Nadi, M. Alizadeh, M. Ahmadabadi, A. R. Yari, S. Hashemi, Arch Hyg Sci. 2012, (1), 41.
- 6M. Malakootian, A. Fatehizadeh, Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng. 2010, 7, 267.
- 7B. Noureddine, S. Qourzal, A. Assabbane, A. Nounah, Y. Ait-Ichou, J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2011, 15, 263.
- 8N. Lima Beluci, G. A. Pisano Mateus, C. S. Miyashiro, N. C. Homem, R. G. Gumez, M. R. Fagundes-Klen, R. Bergamasco, A. M. Salcedo Vieira, Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 222.
- 9M. Liu, Q. Chen, K. Lu, W. Huang, Z. Lu, Y. S. Zhou Ch, C. Gao, Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 173, 135.
- 10C. Anushree, J. Philip, Colloids and Surfaces A. 2019, 193, 567.
- 11S. Wijannarong, S. Aroonsrimorakot, P. Thavipoke, A. Kumsopa, S. Sangjan, APCBEE Proc. 2013, 5, 279.
- 12M. R. Sohrabi, A. Khavaran, S. Shariati, S. Shariati, Arab. J. Chem. 2017, (10), S3523.
- 13N. Boudechiche, M. Fares, S. Ouyahia, H. Yazid, M. Trari, Z. Sadaoui, Microchem. J. 2019, 146, 1010.
- 14M. M. Ibrahim, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102 848.
- 15P. Gharbani, Colloids and Surfaces A. 2018, 548, 191.
- 16S. Sobhanardakani, M. Ghoochian, S. ameh-Bozorghi, R. Zandipak, Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci. 2017, 41, 1047.
10.1007/s40995-017-0312-z Google Scholar
- 17S. Sobhanardakani, R. Zandipak, Clean Techn. Environ Policy. 2017, 19, 1913.
- 18J. Liu, N. Wang, H. Zhang, J. Baeyens, J. Environ. Manage. 2019, 238, 473.
- 19J. dos Santos, C. Pereira, L. A. Pinto, T. Frantz, E. C. Lima, E. L. Foletto, G. Dotto, Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 217, 6.
- 20L. Zhou, H. Zhou, Y. Hu, S. Yan, J. Yang, J. Environ. Manage. 2019, 234, 245.
- 21S. Wang, H. Ning, N. Hu, K. Huang, S. Weng, X. Wu, L. Wu, J. Liu, Alamusi, Composites Part B 2019, 163, 716.
- 22C. He, X. Hu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 14 070.
- 23P. T. Dang, H. T. H. Nguyen, C. D. Dao, G. H. Le, Q. K. Nguyen, K. T. Nguyen, H. T. K. Tran, T. V. Nguyen, T. A. Vu, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 1.
- 24N. Mohammadi, H. Khani, V. K. Gupta, S. Agarwal, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 362, 457.
- 25A. Vinu, K. Z. Hossain, G. Satish Kumar, K. Ariga, Carbon 2006, 44, 530.
- 26W. Tanthapanichakoona, P. Ariyadejwanichb, P. Japthongb, K. Nakagawac, S. R. Mukaic, H. Tamonc, Water Res. 2005, 39, 1347.
- 27Z. Ezzeddine, I. Batonneau-Gener, Y. Pouilloux, H. Hamad, J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 223, 763.
- 28L. Zhao, X. F. Chen, X. C. Wang, Y. J. Zhang, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, M. Antonietti, M. M. Titirici, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3317.
- 29L. Zhao, Z. Bacsik, N. Hedin, W. Wei, Y. Sun, M. Antonietti, M. M. Titirici, Chem. Sus. Chem. 2010, 3, 840.
- 30J. Wei, D. Zhou, Z. Sun, Y. Deng, Y. Xia, D. Y. Zhao, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2322.
- 31Z. Gao, C. Jiang, C. Teng, G. Ren, Y. Zhu, L. Jiang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 21 454.
- 32K. N. Chaudhari, M. Y. Song, J. S. Yu, Small 2014, 10, 2625.
- 33P. Xu, G. M. Zeng, Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 424, 1.
- 34C. L. Warner, W. Chouyyok, K. E. Mackie, Langmuir 2012, 28, 3931.
- 35Z. Liu, H. Wang, C. Liu, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7350.
- 36R. Zandipak, S. Sobhanardakani, Clean Techn. Environ. Policy. 2018, 20, 871.
- 37A. Bedolla-Guzman, I. Sires, A. Thiam, J. M. Peralta-Hernandez, S. Gutiérrez-Granados, E. Brillas, Electrochim. Acta 2016, 206, 307.
- 38S. Shariati, M. Khabazipour, F. Safa, J. Porous Mater. 2017, 24, 129.
- 39M. Sojoudi, S. Shariati, M. Khabazipour, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Res. 2016, 3(2), 287.
- 40M. Khabazipour, S. Shariati, F. Safa, Synth. React. Inorg. M. 2016, 46, 759.
- 41M. Seyed Danesh, H. Faghihian, S. Shariati, J. Nano R. 2018, 52, 54.
- 42H. Hafizi, A. NajafiChermahini, M. Saraji, G. Mohammadnezhad, Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 294, 380.
- 43S. Shariati, M. Golshekan, J. Anal. Chem. 2014, 69, 248.
- 44W. Dai, M. Zheng, Y. Zhao, S. Liao, G. Ji, J. Cao, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 103.
- 45H. Li, D. Xiao, H. He, R. Lin, P. Zuo, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. Chin. 2013, 23, 2657.
- 46M. Pashai Gatabi, H. Milani Moghaddam, M. Ghorbani, J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 216, 117.
- 47F. Tajali Rad, H. Kefayati, S. Shariati, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33(2), e4732.
- 48M. Thommes, K. Kanelo, A. V. Neimark, J. P. Olivier, F. R. Reinose, J. Rouquerol, K. S. W. Sing, Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 1051.
- 49S. L. Lowell, J. E. Shields, M. A. Thomas, M. Thommes, Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, pore size and density, Springer, 2004.
10.1007/978-1-4020-2303-3 Google Scholar
- 50M. Thommes, K. A. Cychosz, Adsorption 2014, 20(2–3), 233.
- 51J. Landers, G. Y. Gor, A. V. Neimark, Colloid. Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2013, 3–32, 437.
- 52K. Sing, Colloids Surf. 2001, 3-9(A), 187.
- 53K. Nadafi, M. Vosoughi, A. Asadi, M. O. Borna, M. Shirmardi, J. Water Chem. Technol. 2014, 36, 125.
- 54L. A. Sepulveda, C. C. Santana, Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 967.
- 55M. Saghanejhad Tehrani, R. Zare-Dorabei, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 27 416.
- 56M. B. Gholivand, Y. Yamini, M. Dayeni, S. Seidi, E. Tahmaseb, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 529.
- 57I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. 1918, 40, 1361.
- 58E. Bulut, M. Özacar, İ. A. Şengil, J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 613.
- 59S. Senthilkumaar, P. Kalaamani, K. Porkodi, P. R. Varadarajan, C. V. Subburaam, Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1618.
- 60E. Sharifpour, H. Haddadi, M. Ghaedi, A. Asfaramc, S. Wang, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 66 311.
- 61I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221.
- 62M. A. K. M. Hanafiah, W. S. W. Ngah, S. H. Zolkafly, L. C. Teong, Z. A. A. Majid, J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 261.
- 63H. Freundlich, W. Engelmann, Über die adsorption in lõsurgen, 1906.
- 64M. I. Tempkin, V. Pyzhev, Acta Phys.Chim. USSR. 1940, 12, 327.
- 65C. Aharoni, M. Ungarish, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1977, 73, 456.
- 66A. Agrawal, C. Pal, K. Sahu, Hazard J. Mater. 2008, 159(2–3), 458.
- 67L. Ai, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 1515.
- 68L. Xiong, Y. Yang, J. Mai, W. Sun, C. Zhang, D. Wei, Q. Chen, J. Ni, Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 313.
- 69N. Barka, S. Qourzal, A. Assabbane, A. Nounah, Y. Ait-Ichou, J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2011, 15, 263.
- 70T. Khan, S. R. M. Kutty, M. Chaudhuri, Sci. Technol. 2010, 28, 657.
- 71H. El Fargani, R. Lakhmiri, A. Albourine, M. Safi, O. Cherkaoui, Chem. Proc. Engin. Res. 2017, 52, 24.
- 72A. J. Lafta, A. F. Halbus, F. S. Daabool, Z. S. Burhan, H. A. Fenoon, F. H. Hussein, J. Chem. 2014, 3, 179.
- 73M. El Haddad, R. Mamouni, R. Slimani, N. Saffaj, M. Ridaoui, S. El Antri, S. Lazar, J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1019.
- 74S. Karmaker, T. Sen, T. K. Saha, Polym. Bull. 2015, 72, 1879.
- 75N. A. Kalkan, S. Aksoy, E. A. Aksoy, N. Hasirci, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 124, 576.
- 76X. Li, X. Xie, H. Luo, L. Li, Z. Li, Z. Xue, W. Li, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 498, 31.