Volume 129, Issue 14 pp. 3891-3895
Zuschrift

Water-Restructuring Mutations Can Reverse the Thermodynamic Signature of Ligand Binding to Human Carbonic Anhydrase

Dr. Jerome M. Fox

Dr. Jerome M. Fox

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Kyungtae Kang

Dr. Kyungtae Kang

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Madhavi Sastry

Dr. Madhavi Sastry

Schrödinger, Sanali Infopark, 8-2-120/113 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 11937, Andhra Pradesh India

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Woody Sherman

Dr. Woody Sherman

Schrödinger, Inc., 120 West 45thStreet, New York, NY, 10036 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Banumathi Sankaran

Dr. Banumathi Sankaran

Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Peter H. Zwart

Peter H. Zwart

Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Prof. Dr. George M. Whitesides

Corresponding Author

Prof. Dr. George M. Whitesides

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 March 2017
Citations: 7

Abstract

This study uses mutants of human carbonic anhydrase (HCAII) to examine how changes in the organization of water within a binding pocket can alter the thermodynamics of protein–ligand association. Results from calorimetric, crystallographic, and theoretical analyses suggest that most mutations strengthen networks of water-mediated hydrogen bonds and reduce binding affinity by increasing the enthalpic cost and, to a lesser extent, the entropic benefit of rearranging those networks during binding. The organization of water within a binding pocket can thus determine whether the hydrophobic interactions in which it engages are enthalpy-driven or entropy-driven. Our findings highlight a possible asymmetry in protein–ligand association by suggesting that, within the confines of the binding pocket of HCAII, binding events associated with enthalpically favorable rearrangements of water are stronger than those associated with entropically favorable ones.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.