Abstract
Infrastructure reliability, in its most general sense, refers to whether a system performs as expected. Reliability is relative, depending on the perspective of the infrastructure user. Safety and security are key components for the concept of reliability, since they pertain to basic survival, and are prerequisites for others. Safety and security are defined, and their emergence as core concepts in infrastructure reliability is described. Infrastructure security now relates to a set of critical infrastructures. Factors that potentially compromise infrastructure security include how infrastructure is spatially distributed and interrelated or interdependent with other infrastructures. Risk-based analytical approaches, and alternatives to these approaches, have arisen to address the likelihood and form of attacks as well as the consequences of attacks on infrastructure. Selected examples of these methodologies are presented. Resource allocation at the federal level emphasizes a risk-based approach, though the nature of risks faced by critical infrastructures, how these risks should be quantified, what analytical tools should be used to produce such estimates, at what geographic scale, and how they are to be incorporated into prioritization schemes are still a subject of considerable debate.
References
- 1 Choate, P. & Walter, S. (1983). America in Ruins, Duke University Press, Durham.
- 2 Tarr, J.A. (1984). The evolution of the urban infrastructure in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, in Perspectives on Urban Infrastructure, R. Hanson, ed, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 4–66.
- 3 Lynch, K. (1962). The Image of the City, MIT Press, Cambridge.
- 4 Perry, D.C. (1995). Building the public city: an introduction, in Building the Public City, D.C. Perry, ed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 1–20.
- 5 National Research Council (1995). Measuring and Improving Infrastructure Performance, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
- 6 Cambridge Systematics (2006). Unclogging America's Arteries: Effective Relief for Highway Bottlenecks 1999—2004, American Highway Users Alliance, Washington, DC, http://www.highways.org/pdfs/bottleneck2004.pdf.
- 7 U.S. Department of Transportation (2004). Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges and Transit: Conditions and Performance, Washington, DC, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2004cpr/pdfs/cp2006.pdf.
- 8 Hendren, P. & Niemeier, D.A. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of state departments of transportation investment decisions: linking performance measures to resource allocation, Journal of Infrastructure Systems 12, 216–229.
- 9 US-Canada Power System Outage Task Force (2004). Final Report on the August 14th 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations.
- 10 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2005). 2005 Report Card for America's Infrastructure, Washington, DC, http://www.asce.org/reportcard.
- 11
Rendell, E.G.
(1998).
A call to pay the U.S. infrastructure price tag,
Public Works Management & Policy
3,
99–103.
10.1177/1087724X9800300201 Google Scholar
- 12 Speir, C. & Stephenson, K. (2002). Does sprawl cost us all? APA Journal 63, 56–70.
- 13 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2005). Discussion of the FY 2006 Risk Methodology and the Urban Areas Security Initiative, Washington, DC.
- 14 Zimmerman, R. (2005). Mass transit infrastructure and urban health, Journal of Urban Health 82, 21–32.
- 15 Beatley, T. (2000). Green Urbanism, Island Press, Washington, DC.
- 16 Litman, T. (2005). Lessons from Katrina and Rita: What Major Disasters can Teach Transportation Planners, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, http://www.vtpi.org/katrina.pdf.
- 17 Perrow, C. (1999). Normal Accidents, 2nd Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- 18 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (2005). We Are All Safer: Lessons Learned and Lives Saved 1975-2005, 3rd Edition, Safety Report NTSB/SR-05/01. Washington, DC, http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2005/SR0501.pdf.
- 19 NTSB (1970). Collapse of U.S. 35 Highway Bridge, Point Pleasant, West Virginia, December 15, 1967, Highway Accident Report, Washington, DC, at http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1971/HAR7101.htm.
- 20 NTSB (1988). Collapse of New York Thruway (I-90) Bridge over the Schoharie Creek, Near Amsterdam, New York, April 5, 1987, Highway Accident Report, Washington, DC, at http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1988/HAR8802.htm.
- 21 Zimmerman, R. (1999). Planning and administration: frameworks and case studies [integrating risk management and natural hazard management], in Natural Disaster Management, J. Ingleton, ed, Tudor Rose, Leicester, pp. 225–227.
- 22 Zimmerman, R. (2003). Public infrastructure service flexibility for response and recovery in the September 11th, 2001 attacks at the World Trade Center, in Beyond September 11th: An Account of Post-Disaster Research, Natural Hazards Research & Applications Information Center, Public Entity Risk Institute, and Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems, University of Colorado, Boulder, pp. 241–268.
- 23 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2003). National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets, at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/Physical_Strategy.pdf.
- 24 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2004). National Incident Management System (NIMS), at http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nims/nims_doc_full.pdf.
- 25 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2005). National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP), at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/NIPP_Plan.pdf.
- 26 Zimmerman, R. (2006). Critical infrastructure and interdependency, in The McGraw-Hill Homeland Security Handbook, D.G. Kamien, ed, The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, Chapter 35, pp. 523–545.
- 27 Simonoff, J.S., Restrepo, C.E. & Zimmerman, R. (2007). Risk management and risk analysis-based decision tools for attacks on electric power, Risk Analysis 27(3), 547–570.
- 28 Rinaldi, S.M., Peerenboom, J.P. & Kelly, T.K. (2001). Identifying, understanding and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies, IEEE Control Systems Magazine 21, 11–25.
- 29
Crowther, K.G. &
Haimes, Y.Y.
(2005).
Application of the inoperability input-output model (IIM) for risk assessment and management of interdependent infrastructures,
Systems Engineering
8,
323–341.
10.1002/sys.20037 Google Scholar
- 30
Zimmerman, R. &
Restrepo, C.E.
(2006).
The next step: quantifying infrastructure interdependencies to improve security,
International Journal of Critical Infrastructures
2,
215–230.
10.1504/IJCIS.2006.009439 Google Scholar
- 31
Bier, V.
(2006).
Game-theoretic and reliability methods in counterterrorism and security, in
Statistical Methods in Counterterrorism: Game Theory, Modeling, Syndromic Surveillance, and Biometric Authentication,
A.G. Wilson,
G.D. Wilson &
D.H. Olwell, eds,
Springer,
New York, pp.
23–40.
10.1007/0-387-35209-0_3 Google Scholar
- 32 Bier, V., Oliveros, S. & Samuelson, L. (2007). Choosing what to protect: strategic defensive allocation against an unknown attacker, Journal of Public Economic Theory 9(4), pp. 563–587.
- 33
Pate-Cornell, E. &
Guikema, S.
(2002).
Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: a systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures,
Military Operations Research
7,
5–20.
10.5711/morj.7.4.5 Google Scholar
- 34 Simonoff, J.S., Restrepo, C.E., Zimmerman, R. & Naphtali, Z.S. (2007). Spatial distribution of electricity and oil and gas pipeline failures in the United States: a state level analysis, in Critical Infrastructure Protection: Issues and Solutions, E.D. Goetz & S. Shenoi, eds, Springer, New York.
- 35 Greenberg, M., Mantell, N., Lahr, M., Felder, F. & Zimmerman, R. (2007). Short and intermediate economic impacts of a terrorist-initiated loss of electric power: case study of New Jersey, Energy Policy 35, 722–733.
- 36 Zimmerman, R., Restrepo, C.E., Simonoff, J.S. & Lave, L. (2007). Risks and economic costs of a terrorist attack on the electricity system, in The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism, H.W. Richardson, P. Gordon & J.E. Moore, eds, Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, pp. 273–290.
- 37 Santos, J.R. & Haimes, Y.Y. (2004). Modeling the demand reduction input-output inoperability due to terrorism of interconnected infrastructures, Risk Analysis 24, 1437–1451.
- 38 Rose, A. & Liao, S. (2005). Modeling resilience to disasters: computable general equilibrium analysis of a water service disruption, Journal of Regional Science 45, 75–112.
- 39 Rosoff, H. & von Winterfeldt, D. (2005). A risk and economic analysis of dirty bomb attacks on the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, Report #05-027, Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
- 40
R. Zimmerman &
T. Horan (eds)
(2004).
Digital Infrastructures: Enabling Civil and Environmental Systems through Information Technology,
Routledge,
London.
10.4324/9780203357125 Google Scholar
- 41 National Research Council (2002). Making the Nation Safer, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
- 42 National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC) (2005). Risk Management Approaches to Protection, Final Report and Recommendations by the Council, Washington, DC, at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/niac/NIAC_RMWG_-_2-13-06v9_FINAL.pdf.
- 43 U.S. Government Accountability Office (2005). Risk Management. Further Refinements Needed to Assess Risks and Prioritize Protective Measures at Ports and Other Infrastructure, Washington, DC.
- 44 U.S. Government Accountability Office (2006). Homeland Security Grants: Observations on Process DHS Used to Allocate Funds to Selected Urban Areas (GAO-07-381 R), Washington, DC, at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07381r.pdf.
- 45 U.S. DHS. (2007). DHS Announces $445 Million to Secure Critical Infrastructure, Washington, DC.
- 46 American Planning Association (APA). (2007). APA Advocate, Chicago, p. 1.
Citing Literature
Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment
Browse other articles of this reference work: