Abstract
We discuss two classes of bias that arise in case–control studies, selection bias and information bias. A third source of bias, confounding, is not considered in this article. Selection bias arises either when cases in the study sample are not representative of cases arising from the source population (“study base”) or when controls are not representative of corresponding noncases in the study base. Sources of selection bias include bias in identifying cases or noncases in the study base, nonrepresentative sampling techniques, and selective refusal to participate (nonresponse bias). Use of nonrepresentative controls, such as hospital-based controls, can lead to bias if the exposure distribution differs from that of controls in the study base. Information bias arises from inaccurate reporting of exposures and other covariates by cases or controls, and can result in serious distortion of estimated odds ratios when the errors in reporting by cases and controls are differential (recall bias).
References
- 1 Beral, V. (1990). Childhood leukemia near nuclear plants in the United Kingdom: the evolution of a systematic approach to studying rare disease in small geographic areas, American Journal of Epidemiology 132, Supplement, S63–S68.
- 2 Berkson, J. (1976). Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data, Biometrics Bulletin 2, 47–53.
- 3 Breslow, N.E. & Day, N.E. (1980). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. I. The Analysis of Case–Control Studies, IARC Scientific Publication No. 32. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon.
- 4 Cole, P. & Morrison, A.S. (1980). Basic issues in population screening for cancer, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 64, 1263–1272.
- 5 Cornfield, J. & Haenszel, W. (1960). Some aspects of retrospective studies, Journal of Chronic Diseases 11, 523–524.
- 6 Daling, J.R., Malone, K.E., Voigt, L.F., White, E. & Weiss, N.S. (1994). Risk of breast cancer among young women: relationship to induced abortion, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 86, 1584–1592.
- 7 Doll, R. & Hill, A.B. (1952). A study of the aetiology of carcinoma of the lung, British Medical Journal 2, 1271–1286.
- 8 Doll, R. & Hill, A.B. (1964). Mortality in relation to smoking: ten years' observation of British doctors, British Medical Journal 1, 1399–1410, 1460–1467.
- 9 Doll, R. & Peto, R. (1976). Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years' observations on male British doctors, British Medical Journal ii, 1525–1536.
- 10 Dorn, H.F. (1959). Some problems arising in prospective and retrospective studies of the etiology of disease, New England Journal of Medicine 261, 571–579.
- 11 Feinstein, A.R. (1975). The epidemiologic trohoc, the ablative risk ratio, and retrospective research, Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy 14, 291–306.
- 12 Gittes, R.F. (1991). Carcinoma of the prostate, New England Journal of Medicine 324, 236–245.
- 13 Greenberg, E.R. (1990). Random digit dialing for control selection. A review and a caution on its use in studies of childhood cancer, American Journal of Epidemiology 131, 1–5.
- 14 Greenland, S. (1980). The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates, American Journal of Epidemiology 112, 564–569.
- 15 Greenland, S. (1996). Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases, International Journal of Epidemiology 25, 1107–1116.
- 16 Hartge, E.R., Brinton, L.A., Rosenthal, J.F., Cahill, J.I., Hoover, R.N. & Waksberg, J. (1984). Random digit dialing in selecting a population-based control group, American Journal of Epidemiology 120, 825–833.
- 17 Hartge, P. (1997). Abortion, breast cancer, and epidemiology (Editorial), New England Journal of Medicine 336, 127–128.
- 18 Kass, P.H. (1992). Converging toward a “Unified Field Theory” of epidemiology (Editorial), Epidemiology 3, 473–474.
- 19 Kaufman, D.W., Kelly, J.P., Levy, M. & Shapiro, S. (1991). The Drug Etiology of Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- 20 Kewitz, H.J., Jesdinsky, H., Schröter, P. & Lindtner, E. (1977). Reserpine and breast cancer in women in Germany, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2, 79–83.
- 21 Leclerc, A., Martinez Cortes, M., Gerin, G., Luce, D. & Brugere, J. (1994). Sinonasal cancer and wood dust exposure: results from a case–control study, American Journal of Epidemiology 140, 340–349.
- 22 Linet, M.S. & Brookmeyer, R. (1987). Use of cancer controls in case–control cancer studies, American Journal of Epidemiology 125, 1–11.
- 23 Louik, C., Mitchell, A., Werler, M., Hanson, J. & Shapiro, S. (1987). Maternal exposure to spermicides in relation to certain birth defects, New England Journal of Medicine 317, 474–478.
- 24 Lund, E., Meirik, O., Adami, H.O., Bergstrom, R., Christoffersen, T. & Bergsjo, P. (1989). Oral contraceptive use and premenopausal breast cancer in Sweden and Norway: possible effects of a different pattern of use, International Journal of Epidemiology 18, 527–532.
- 25 MacMahon, B. & Trichopoulos, D. (1996). Epidemiology. Principles and Methods. Little, Brown & Company, Boston.
- 26 Mantel, N. & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22, 719–748.
- 27 Melbye, M., Wohlfahrt, J., Olsen, J.H., Frisch, M., Westergaard, T., Helweg-Larsen, K. & Andersen, P.K. (1997). Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer, New England Journal of Medicine 336, 81–85.
- 28 Miettinen, O.S. (1985). Theoretical Epidemiology: Principles of Occurrence Research in Medicine. Wiley, New York.
- 29 Morrison, A.S. (1985). Screening in Chronic Disease, 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- 30 Olsson, H., Moller, T.R. & Ranstam, J. (1989). Early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer among premenopausal women: final report from a study in southern Sweden, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 81, 1000–1004.
- 31 Parsonnet, J., Friedman, G.D., Vandersteen, D.P., Chang, Y., Vogelman, J.H., Orentreich, N. & Sibley, R.K. (1991). Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma, New England Journal of Medicine 325, 1127–1131.
- 32 Rosenberg, L. (1994). Induced abortion and breast cancer: more scientific data are needed (Editorial), Journal of the National Cancer Institute 86, 1569–1570.
- 33 Rosenberg, L., Metzger, L.S. & Palmer, J.R. (1993). Epidemiology of breast cancer. Alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer: a review of the evidence, Epidemiology Review 15, 133–144.
- 34 Rosenberg, L., Palmer, J.R., Lesko, S.M. & Shapiro, S. (1990). Oral contraceptive use and the risk of myocardial infarction, American Journal of Epidemiology 131, 1009–1016.
- 35 Rosenberg, L., Shapiro, S., Slone, D., Kaufman, D.W., Helmrich, S., Miettinen, O.S., Stolley, P., Rosenshein, N.B., Schottenfeld, D. & Engle, R.L. (1982). Epithelial ovarian cancer and combination oral contraceptives, Journal of the American Medical Association 247, 3210–3212.
- 36 Rothman, K.J. (1986). Modern Epidemiology. Little, Brown & Company, Boston.
- 37 Sackett, D.L. (1979). Bias in analytic research, Journal of Chronic Diseases 32, 51–63.
- 38 Shapiro, S., Castellana, J.V. & Sprafka, J.M. (1996). Alcohol-containing mouthwashes and oropharyngeal cancer: a spurious association due to underascertainment of confounders?, American Journal of Epidemiology 144, 1091–1095.
- 39 Skegg, D.C.G. (1988). Potential for bias in case–control studies of oral contraceptives and breast cancer, American Journal of Epidemiology 127, 205–212.
- 40 Stadel, B.V. (1981). Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease, New England Journal of Medicine 305, 612–618.
- 41 Stamey, T.A., Yang, N., Hay, A.R., McNeal, J., Freiha, F.S. & Redwine, E. (1987). Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate, New England Journal of Medicine 317, 909–916.
- 42 Steineck, G. & Ahlbom, A. (1992). A definition of bias founded on the concept of the study base, Epidemiology 3, 477–482.
- 43 Swan, S.H., Shaw, G.M. & Schulman, J. (1992). Reporting and selection bias in case–control studies of congenital malformations, Epidemiology 3, 356–363.
- 44
Volini, I.F.,
Greenspan, I.,
Ehrlich, I.,
Gonner, J.A.,
Felfenfeld, O. &
Schwartz, S.R.
(1950).
Hemopoietic changes during administration of chloramphenicol,
Journal of the American Medical Association
42,
1333–1335.
10.1001/jama.1950.02910350003002 Google Scholar
- 45 Wacholder, S., McLaughlin, J.K., Silverman, D.T. & Mandel, J.S. (1992). Selection of controls in case–control studies. I. Principles, American Journal of Epidemiology 135, 1019–1028.
- 46 Wacholder, S., Silverman, D.T., McLaughlin, J.K. & Mandel, J.S. (1992). Selection of controls in case–control studies. II. Types of controls, American Journal of Epidemiology 135, 1029–1041.
- 47 Wacholder, S., Silverman, D.T., McLaughlin, J.K. & Mandel, J.S. (1992). Selection of controls in case–control studies. III. Design options American Journal of Epidemiology 135, 1042–1050.
- 48 Welch, H., Lewis, C.N. & Kerlan, I. (1954). Blood dyscrasias, a nationwide survey, Antibiotics and Chemotherapy 4, 607.
- 49 West, D.W., Sehaman, K.L., Lyon, J.L., Robison, L.M. & Allred, R. (1984). Differences in risk estimation from a hospital and a population-based case–control study, International Journal of Epidemiology 13, 235–239.
- 50 Ziel, H.K. & Finkle, W.D. (1975). Increased risk of endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens, New England Journal of Medicine 293, 1167–1170.