Volume 24, Issue 9 pp. 1223-1228
Article

Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Evaluating the Impact of Using Gestational Age–Specific Reference Values

Anthony O. Odibo MD

Corresponding Author

Anthony O. Odibo MD

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA.

Address correspondence to Anthony O. Odibo, MD, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 2000 Ravdin Courtyard, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Riddick

Christopher Riddick

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA.

Search for more papers by this author
Emmanuelle Pare MD

Emmanuelle Pare MD

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA.

Search for more papers by this author
David M. Stamilio MD, MSCE

David M. Stamilio MD, MSCE

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA.

Search for more papers by this author
George A. Macones MD, MSCE

George A. Macones MD, MSCE

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2005
Citations: 89

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of using gestational age–specific reference levels of the cerebroplacental Doppler ratio (CPR) with categorical threshold in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes in growth-restricted pregnancies.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of cases of intrauterine growth restriction over a 3-year period was conducted. The umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility indices were converted to CPRs. The efficacy of using gestational age–specific reference levels of CPRs in predicting adverse outcomes was compared with the use of a CPR of less than 1.08. Adverse perinatal outcomes evaluated included cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tones, umbilical artery pH less than 7.0, 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7.0, intraventricular hemorrhage greater than grade 2, periventricular leukomalacia, respiratory distress syndrome, and perinatal death.

Results

Of 183 pregnancies meeting our inclusion criteria, there were 70 with at least 1 adverse outcome. With the use of a CPR ratio below the 5th percentile for gestational age, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for predicting an adverse outcome were 65%, 73%, 73%, and 65%, respectively, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 5.2 (1.4–19.4; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69). With a CPR threshold of less than 1.08, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 72%, 62%, 68%, and 67%, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 4.2 (1.2–15.3; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.67).

Conclusions

An abnormal CPR is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in growth-restricted fetuses. The accuracy of using gestational age–specific reference levels was similar to that of using a categorical threshold.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.