Chapter 13

Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers in the Management of Central Nervous System HIV Infection and the AIDS Dementia Complex

Magnus Gisslén

Magnus Gisslén

Departments of Infectious Diseases, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Lars Hagberg

Lars Hagberg

Departments of Infectious Diseases, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Paola Cinque

Paola Cinque

Clinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce Brew

Bruce Brew

Neurology, University of New South Wales and St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Richard W. Price

Richard W. Price

Department of Neurology, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, 94110

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 October 2008

Summary

The major clinical and pathological features of the AIDS dementia complex (ADC), or synonymously, AIDS dementia, HIV-associated dementia, and minor cognitive motor disorder, were characterized almost 20 years ago. The fundamental difficulty is that although ADC is caused by HIV itself, the presence of HIV in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has little diagnostic specificity. The authors describe a pathogenetically based approach using a combination of CSF markers. In simple terms, ADC pathogenesis can be considered to result from the evolving interactions of three factors: the driving force, HIV; the modulating influence, immune dys-regulation; and the target, central nervous system (CNS). Importantly, alteration of the immune system is likely important in permitting progressive HIV infection of the CNS and in determining its pathogenic character. In the immunological marker category, the most promising measurements are those of CSF neopterin and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1). The uncertainty of ADC diagnosis more than 20 years after its initial characterization remains a conspicuous shortcoming both in the clinic and in clinical trials. There is still a pressing need to develop objective, laboratory-based markers to aid in predicting development of ADC, establishing ADC diagnosis, and appraising disease activity, including treatment responses. While it is likely that the foundation has been laid with a number of exploratory studies already published, these have fallen short of practical clinical application.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.