In vitro evaluation of bovine pericardium after a soft decellularization approach for use in tissue engineering
Marina Augusto Heuschkel
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAmanda Leitolis
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorJoão Gabriel Roderjan
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorPaula Hansen Suss
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCésar Augusto Oleinik Luzia
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorFrancisco Diniz Affonso da Costa
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Alejandro Correa
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Correspondence
Alejandro Correa and Marco Augusto Stimamiglio, Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Emails: [email protected] (AC); [email protected] (MA)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Marco Augusto Stimamiglio
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Correspondence
Alejandro Correa and Marco Augusto Stimamiglio, Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Emails: [email protected] (AC); [email protected] (MA)
Search for more papers by this authorMarina Augusto Heuschkel
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorAmanda Leitolis
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorJoão Gabriel Roderjan
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorPaula Hansen Suss
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCésar Augusto Oleinik Luzia
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorFrancisco Diniz Affonso da Costa
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná—PUCPR, Curitiba, Brazil
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Alejandro Correa
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Correspondence
Alejandro Correa and Marco Augusto Stimamiglio, Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Emails: [email protected] (AC); [email protected] (MA)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Marco Augusto Stimamiglio
Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Correspondence
Alejandro Correa and Marco Augusto Stimamiglio, Laboratory of Basic Biology of Stem Cells, Carlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz-Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Emails: [email protected] (AC); [email protected] (MA)
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Pericardial membrane derived from bovine heart tissues is a promising source of material for use in tissue-engineering applications. However, tissue processing is required for its use in humans due to the presence of animal antigens. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural integrity and biocompatibility of the bovine pericardium (BP) after a soft decellularization process with a 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution, with the aim to remove xenoantigens and preserve extracellular matrix (ECM) bioactivity. The decellularization process promoted a mean reduction of 77% of the amount of DNA in the samples in which cell nuclei staining was undetectable. The ECM content was maintained as mostly preserved after decellularization as well as its biomechanical properties. In addition, the decellularization protocol has proven to be efficient in removing the xenoantigen alpha-gal, which is responsible for immune rejection. The decellularized BP was noncytotoxic in vitro and allowed human adipose-derived stem cell (hASC) adhesion. Finally, after 7 days in culture, the tissue scaffold became repopulated by hASCs, and after 30 days, the ECM protein pro-collagen I was seen in the scaffold. Together, these characteristics indicated that soft BP decellularization with 0.1% SDS solution allows the acquirement of a bioactive scaffold suitable for cell repopulation and potentially useful for regenerative medicine.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors report there are no potential conflict of interests or financial interests.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
xen12464-sup-0001-Supinfo.docxWord document, 4.6 MB |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Gauvin R, Marinov G, Mehri Y, et al. A comparative study of bovine and porcine pericardium to highlight their potential advantages to manufacture percutaneous cardiovascular implants. J Biomater Appl. 2013; 28: 552-565.
- 2Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: Progress toward understanding and prevention. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79: 1072-1080.
- 3Manji RA, Zhu LF, Nijjar NK, et al. Glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic heart valve conduits calcify and fail from xenograft rejection. Circulation. 2006; 114: 318-327.
- 4Umashankar PR, Mohanan PV, Kumari TV. Glutaraldehyde treatment elicits toxic response compared to decellularization in bovine pericardium. Toxicol Int. 2012; 19: 51-58.
- 5Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006; 27: 3675-3683.
- 6Crapo PM, Badylak T. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization process. Biomaterials. 2011; 32: 1-21.
- 7Parmaksiz M, Dogan A, Odabas S, et al. Clinical applications of decellularized extracellular matrices for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomed Mater. 2016; 11: 1-14.
- 8Vorotnikova E, Mcintosh D, Dewilde A, et al. Extracellular matrix derived products modulate endothelial and progenitor cell migration and proliferation in vitro and stimulate regenerative healing in vivo. Matrix Biol. 2010; 29: 690-700.
- 9Xu CC, Chan RW, Weinberger DG, et al. A bovine acellular scaffold for vocal fold reconstruction in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 92: 18-32.
- 10Gilbert TW, Freund J, Badylak SF. Quantification of DNA in biologic scaffold materials. J Surg Res. 2009; 152: 135-139.
- 11Aguiari P, Iop L, Favaretto F, et al. In vitro comparative assessment of decellularized bovine pericardial patches and commercial bioprosthetic heart valves. Biomed Mater. 2017; 12: 1-12.
- 12Keane TJ, Londono R, Turner NJ, Badylak SF. Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 1771-1781.
- 13Naso F, Gandaglia A, Bottio T, et al. First quantification of alpha-Gal epitope in current glutaraldehyde-fixed heart valve bioprostheses. Xenotransplantation. 2013; 20: 252-261.
- 14Galili U. Interaction of the natural anti-Gal antibody with α-galactosyl epitopes: a major obstacle for xenotransplantation in humans. Immunol Today. 1993; 14: 480-482.
- 15Mcdade JK, Brennan-Pierce EP, Ariganello MB, et al. Interactions of U937 macrophage-like cells with decellularized pericardial matrix materials: influence of crosslinking treatment. Acta Biomater. 2013; 9: 7191-7199.
- 16Bružauskaitė I, Bironaitė D, Bagdonas E, Bernotienė E. Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes—different cell effects. Cytotechnology. 2016; 68: 355-369.
- 17Hasan A, Ragaert K, Swieszkowski W, et al. Biomechanical properties of native and tissue engineered heart valve constructs. J Biomech. 2014; 47: 1949-1963.
- 18 NIH Publication No. 07–4519. ICCVAM – Recommended Test Method Protocol BALB/c 3T3 NRU Cytotoxicity Test Method. 2006. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/iccvam/docs/protocols/ivcyto-balbc.pdf. Accessed May 6, 2018.
- 19Rebelatto CK, Aguiar AM, Moretao MP, et al. Dissimilar differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and adipose tissue. Exp Biol Med. 2008; 233: 901-913.
- 20Collatusso C, Roderjan JG, Vieira ED, et al. Effect of SDS-based decelullarization in the prevention of calcification in glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine pericardium. Study in rats. Rev Bras Cardiovasc. 2012; 27: 88-96.
- 21Costa F, Santos LR, Collatusso C, et al. Thirteen years’ experience with the Ross operation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2009; 18: 84-94.
- 22Zheng MH, Chen J, Kirilak Y, et al. Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: Possible implications in human implantation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 73: 61-67.
- 23Rieder E, Kasimir MT, Silberhumer G, et al. Decellularization protocols of porcine heart valves differ importantly in efficiency of cell removal and susceptibility of the matrix to recellularization with human vascular cells. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127: 399-405.
- 24Chang Y, Chen SC, Wei HJ, et al. Tissue regeneration observed in a porous acellular bovine pericardium used to repair a myocardial defect in the right ventricle of a rat model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 130: 1-10.
- 25Mathapati S, Bishi DK, Venugopal JR, et al. Nanofibers coated on acellular tissue-engineered bovine pericardium supports differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into endothelial cells for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine. 2014; 9: 623-634.
- 26Yang YG, Sykes M. Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007; 7: 519-531.
- 27Sun W, Sacks M, Fulchiero G, et al. Response of heterograft heart valve biomaterials to moderate cyclic loading. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004; 69: 658-669.
- 28Vyavahare N, Ogle M, Schoen FJ, et al. Mechanisms of bioprosthetic heart valve failure: fatigue causes collagen denaturation and glycosaminoglycan loss. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 46: 44-50.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199907)46:1<44::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-D CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 29Lee TC, Midura RJ, Hascall VC, et al. The effect of elastin damage on the mechanics of the aortic valve. J Biomech. 2001; 34: 203-210.
- 30Bačáková L, Filová E, Rypáček F, et al. Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering. Physiol Res. 2004; 53: S35-S45.
- 31Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater. 2009; 5: 1-13.
- 32Liu ZZ, Wong ML, Griffiths LG. Effect of bovine pericardial extracellular matrix scaffold niche on seeded human mesenchymal stem cell function. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 37089.
- 33Kagan HM, Crombie GD, Jordan RE, Lewis W, FranzblauC. Proteolysis of elastin-ligand complexes. Stimulation of elastase digestion of insoluble elastin by sodium dodecyl sulfate. Biochemistry. 1972; 11: 3412-3418.
- 34Spina M, Naso F, Zancan I, et al. Biocompatibility issues of next generation decellularized bioprosthetic devices. Conf Pap Sci. 2014; 2014: 1-6.
- 35Tran H, Dihn T, Nguyen M, et al. Preparation and characterization of acellular porcine pericardium for cardiovascular surgery. Turkish J Biol. 2016; 40: 1243-1250.
- 36Lakshmanan R, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S. Living cardiac patch: the elixir for cardiac regeneration. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012; 12: 1623-1640.
- 37Wei H, Chen S, Chang Y, et al. Porous acellular bovine pericardia seeded with mesenchymal stem cells as a patch to repair a myocardial defect in a syngeneic rat model. Biomaterials. 2006; 27: 5409-5419.
- 38Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2005; 4: 518-524.
- 39Wu Q, Dai M, Xu P, et al. In vivo effects of human adipose-derived stem cells reseeding on acellular bovine pericardium in nude mice. Exp Biol Med. 2016; 241: 31-39.