Volume 64, Issue S2 pp. S58-S61
MILITARY TRANSFUSION

The Tägerwilen II report: Recommendations from the NATO Prehospital Care Improvement Initiative Task Force

Christian Medby

Corresponding Author

Christian Medby

Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical Services, Sessvollmoen, Norway

Department of Traumatology, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

Correspondence

Christian Medby, Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical Services, 2058 Sessvollmoen, Norway.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Colleen Forestier

Colleen Forestier

Canadian Forces Health Services Headquarters, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Benjamin Ingram

Benjamin Ingram

United States Army, NATO Allied Special Operations Forces Command (SOFCOM), Mons, Belgium

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Duncan Parkhouse

Duncan Parkhouse

Defence Medical Services, Birmingham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Alvarez-Brueckmann

Michael Alvarez-Brueckmann

Regional Medical Support Command, Diez, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander Faas

Alexander Faas

Military Medical Center Frauenfeld, Swiss Armed Forces, Frauenfeld, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 February 2024
Citations: 1

The views expressed are those of the authors and of the “Prehospital Care Improvement Initiative Task Force.” They may not reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated organization or agency.

Abstract

Background

The Committee of the Chiefs of Military Medical Services (COMEDS) initiated the Prehospital Care Improvement Initiative Task Force (PHCII TF) to advise on how to improve prehospital care within NATO nations. The Task Force consisted of the NATO Military Health Care Working Group and its subordinated expert panels, including the Blood Panel, the Emergency Medicine Panel and the Special Operations Forces Medicine Panel.

Method

The PHCII TF identified four key prehospital care themes for exploration: 1) Tactical Casualty Care, 2) Blood Far Forward), 3) Forward Surgical Capabilities), and 4) Prolonged Casualty Care. A consensus experimentation workshop explored the four themes, utilizing a modified Delphi technique and Utstein rotations during syndicate work, resulting in 83 consensus statements. The consensus statements were further evaluated on six criteria: actionable, measurable, urgent, interoperability, low risk/threat and impact.

Results

The 83 consensus statements, when weighted against the six criteria, resulted in 15 recommendations, focusing on standardization of training, ensuring provision of evidence-based practices and removing legislative barriers to improve prehospital care.

Conclusion

The recommendations on these four themes reflect the most significant priorities in improving prehospital care, and must be incorporated in the on-going revision of NATO doctrine.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.