Volume 59, Issue 5 pp. 1843-1849
BLOOD GROUP GENOMICS

A large deletion spanning XG and GYG2 constitutes a genetic basis of the Xgnull phenotype, underlying anti-Xga production

Yan Quan Lee

Yan Quan Lee

Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Jill R. Storry

Jill R. Storry

Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Office of Medical Services, Lund, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Vanja Karamatic Crew

Vanja Karamatic Crew

International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Gregory R. Halverson

Gregory R. Halverson

Hoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Nicole Thornton

Nicole Thornton

International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Martin L. Olsson

Corresponding Author

Martin L. Olsson

Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Office of Medical Services, Lund, Sweden

Address reprint requests to: Martin L. Olsson, Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, BMC C14, SE-22184 Lund, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 April 2019
Citations: 6
This study was supported by grants to MLO from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (2014.0312), the Swedish Research Council (2014-71X-14251) and governmental ALF grants to the university healthcare in Region Skåne, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PBDX/XG gene encoding the Xga blood group antigen was described in 1994, but the genetic determinant of XG expression on RBCs was reported only in 2018. However, the frequencies of Xg(a−) individuals could not explain the rarity of anti-Xga makers. We therefore sought to elucidate the molecular basis of the Xg(a−) phenotype in people producing anti-Xga.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Two genomic DNA (gDNA) and 13 plasma-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from anti-Xga makers were investigated (14 males and one female). PBDX/XG exon sequencing was attempted on one gDNA sample. Polymerase chain reaction assays were developed and bioinformatics used to define a suspected deletion in all samples.

RESULTS

Investigation of one gDNA sample revealed a 114-kb deletion (esv2662319) on the X chromosome that spans XG exons 4 through 10 and the downstream GYG2 gene. A 3555-bp fragment bridging this deletion was amplified to confirm its presence. Another deletion-specific polymerase chain reaction of 714 bp enabled identification of esv2662319 in both gDNA samples and eight cfDNA samples while ruling it out in one cfDNA. Males were hemizygous for esv2662319 and the female likely homozygous. Four cfDNA sample results were inconclusive, probably due to poor sample quality. Sanger sequencing recognized the recombination junctions as a heterogeneous LTR6B sequence.

CONCLUSION

We identified a large deletion on the X chromosome, resulting in a true, tissue-wide Xgnull phenotype. This deletion was found in 10 of 11 anti-Xga makers from which DNA could be amplified. One sample remained unexplained, indicating further heterogeneity to be explored.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.