Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction
Cindy H. Wei MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorAmie M. Scott DPhil
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorAlison N. Price BA
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorHelen Catherine Miller BA
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorAnne F. Klassen DPhil
Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorSabrina M. Jhanwar PhD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorBabak J. Mehrara MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorJoseph J. Disa MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorColleen McCarthy MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorEvan Matros MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorPeter G. Cordeiro MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorVirgilio Sacchini MD
Breast Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Andrea L. Pusic MD, MHS
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Andrea L. Pusic, MD, MHS, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Room MRI-1007, New York, NY 10065, USA, or e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCindy H. Wei MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorAmie M. Scott DPhil
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorAlison N. Price BA
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorHelen Catherine Miller BA
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorAnne F. Klassen DPhil
Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorSabrina M. Jhanwar PhD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorBabak J. Mehrara MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorJoseph J. Disa MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorColleen McCarthy MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorEvan Matros MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorPeter G. Cordeiro MD
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorVirgilio Sacchini MD
Breast Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Andrea L. Pusic MD, MHS
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Andrea L. Pusic, MD, MHS, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Room MRI-1007, New York, NY 10065, USA, or e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is considered an oncologically safe option for select patients. As many patients are candidates for nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM), reliable patient-reported outcome data are crucial for decision-making. The objective of this study was to determine whether patient satisfaction and/or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were improved by preservation of the nipple with NSM compared to SSM and nipple reconstruction. Subjects were identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients who completed the BREAST-Q following mastectomy and breast reconstruction between March and October 2011 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Fifty-two patients underwent NSM followed by immediate expander-implant reconstruction. A comparison group consisted of 202 patients who underwent SSM followed by immediate expander-implant reconstruction and later nipple reconstruction. HRQOL and satisfaction domains as measured by BREAST-Q scores were compared in multivariate linear regression analyzes that controlled for potential confounding factors. NSM patients reported significantly higher scores in the psychosocial (p = 0.01) and sexual well-being (p = 0.02) domains compared to SSM patients. There was no significant difference in the BREAST-Q physical well-being, satisfaction with breast, or satisfaction with outcome domains between the NSM and SSM groups. NSM is associated with higher psychosocial and sexual well-being compared to SSM and nipple reconstruction. Preoperative discussion of such HRQOL outcomes with patients may facilitate informed decision-making and realistic postoperative expectations.
References
- 1Little JW. Nipple-areola reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11: 351.
- 2Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80: 699–704.
- 3Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 457–63.
- 4Goh SC, Martin NA, Pandya AN, Cutress RI. Patient satisfaction following nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and tattooing. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 360–3.
- 5Harcourt D, Russell C, Hughes J, White P, Nduka C, Smith R. Patient satisfaction in relation to nipple reconstruction: the importance of information provision. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 494–9.
- 6Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C, et al. The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69: 389–93.
- 7Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 3218–22.
- 8Agarwal S, Agarwal S, Neumayer L, Agarwal JP. Therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy: trends based on a national cancer database. Am J Surg 2014; 208: 93–8.
- 9Chung AP, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: where are we now? Surg Oncol 2008; 17: 261–6.
- 10Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody HS, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of the literature. Breast J 2009; 15: 440–9.
- 11Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GPH. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 305–16.
- 12Endara M, Chen D, Verma K, Nahabedian MY, Spear SL. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 1043–54.
- 13Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, et al. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 969–84.
- 14Opatt D, Morrow M. The dual role of nipple preservation. J Support Oncol 2006; 4: 233–4.
- 15Murthy V, Chamberlain R. Defining a place for nipple-sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence-based review. Breast J 2013; 19: 571–81.
- 16Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 118: 623–33.
- 17Peled AW, Duralde E, Foster RD, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72(Suppl 1): S48–52.
- 18Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 345–53.
- 19Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The Breast-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 293–302.
- 20Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62: 591–5.
- 21Mosahebi A, Ramakrishnan V, Gittos M, Collier DS. Envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR), improving outcome without oncological compromise. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 1025–30.
- 22Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five year experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 117: 333–8.
- 23Yueh JH, Houlihan MJ, Slavin SA, Lee BT, Pories SE, Morris DJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62: 586–90.
- 24Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 818–29.
- 25Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 1083–90.
- 26Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a descriptive study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 360–6.
- 27Spear SL, Schwarz KA, Venturi ML, Barbosa T, Al-Attar A. Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 1–9.
- 28Gahm J, Jurell G, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. J Plat Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 332–8.
- 29Brandberg Y, Sandelin K, Erikson S, et al. Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3943–9.
- 30den Heijer M, Seynaeve C, Timman R, et al. Body image and psychological distress after prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48: 1263–8.
- 31Gopie JP, Mureau MA, Seynaeve C, et al. Body image issues after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer. Fam Cancer 2013; 12: 479–87.
- 32Koslow S, Pharmer LA, Scott AM, et al. Long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implant reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 3422–9.