Volume 71, Issue 2 e70003
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine-Learning Algorithms

Niccolò Gentile

Niccolò Gentile

University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Search for more papers by this author
Michela Bia

Michela Bia

Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew E. Clark

Andrew E. Clark

Paris School of Economics, CNRS and University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Search for more papers by this author
Conchita D'Ambrosio

Corresponding Author

Conchita D'Ambrosio

University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Correspondence: Conchita D'Ambrosio ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Alexandre Tkatchenko

Alexandre Tkatchenko

University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 March 2025

Funding: This study was supported by University of Luxembourg (IAS- DSEWELL), and EUR (ANR-17-EURE-0001).

ABSTRACT

Machine Learning (ML) methods are increasingly being used across a variety of fields, and have led to the discovery of intricate relationships between variables. We here apply ML methods to predict and interpret life satisfaction using data from the UK British Cohort Study. We discuss the application of first Penalized Linear Models and then one non-linear method, Random Forests. We present two key model-agnostic interpretative tools for the latter method: Permutation Importance and Shapley Values. With a parsimonious set of explanatory variables, neither Penalized Linear Models nor Random Forests produce major improvements over the standard Non-penalized Linear Model. However, once we consider a richer set of controls these methods do produce a non-negligible improvement in predictive accuracy. Although marital status, and emotional health continue to be the most-important predictors of life satisfaction, as in the existing literature, gender becomes insignificant in the non-linear analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.