What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine-Learning Algorithms
Niccolò Gentile
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorMichela Bia
Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorAndrew E. Clark
Paris School of Economics, CNRS and University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Conchita D'Ambrosio
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Correspondence: Conchita D'Ambrosio ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorAlexandre Tkatchenko
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorNiccolò Gentile
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorMichela Bia
Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorAndrew E. Clark
Paris School of Economics, CNRS and University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Conchita D'Ambrosio
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Correspondence: Conchita D'Ambrosio ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorAlexandre Tkatchenko
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Search for more papers by this authorFunding: This study was supported by University of Luxembourg (IAS- DSEWELL), and EUR (ANR-17-EURE-0001).
ABSTRACT
Machine Learning (ML) methods are increasingly being used across a variety of fields, and have led to the discovery of intricate relationships between variables. We here apply ML methods to predict and interpret life satisfaction using data from the UK British Cohort Study. We discuss the application of first Penalized Linear Models and then one non-linear method, Random Forests. We present two key model-agnostic interpretative tools for the latter method: Permutation Importance and Shapley Values. With a parsimonious set of explanatory variables, neither Penalized Linear Models nor Random Forests produce major improvements over the standard Non-penalized Linear Model. However, once we consider a richer set of controls these methods do produce a non-negligible improvement in predictive accuracy. Although marital status, and emotional health continue to be the most-important predictors of life satisfaction, as in the existing literature, gender becomes insignificant in the non-linear analysis.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
roiw70003-sup-0001-Supinfo.zipZip archive, 37.6 KB |
Data S1: Supporting Information. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Breiman, L. 2001. “Random Forests.” Machine Learning 45: 5–32.
- Breiman, L., J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall, Wadsworth.
- Clark, A. E. 2018. “Four Decades of the Economics of Happiness: Where Next?” Review of Income and Wealth 64: 245–269.
- Clark, A. E., S. Flèche, R. Layard, N. Powdthavee, and G. Ward. 2018. The Origins of Happiness: The Science of Well-Being Over the Life Course. Princeton University Press.
10.2307/j.ctvc77dgq Google Scholar
- Clark, A. E., A. Kamesaka, and T. Tamura. 2015. “Rising Aspirations Dampen Satisfaction.” Education Economics 23: 515–531.
- Clark, A. E., and A. Lepinteur. 2019. “The Causes and Consequences of Early-Adult Unemployment: Evidence From Cohort Data.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 166: 107–124.
- Clark, A. E., and A. J. Oswald. 1994. “Unhappiness and Unemployment.” Economic Journal 104: 648–659.
- Clark, A. E., and A. J. Oswald. 1996. “Satisfaction and Comparison Income.” Journal of Public Economics 61: 359–381.
- Clark, A. E., and A. J. Oswald. 1998. “Comparison-Concave Utility and Following Behaviour in Social and Economic Settings.” Journal of Public Economics 70: 133–155.
- Dolan, P., T. Peasgood, and M. White. 2008. “Do We Really Know What Makes Us Happy? A Review of the Economic Literature on the Factors Associated With Subjective Well-Being.” Journal of Economic Psychology 29: 94–122.
- Finkelstein, A., E. Luttmer, and M. Notowidigdo. 2013. “What Good Is Wealth Without Health? The Effect of Health on the Marginal Utility of Consumption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11: 221–258.
- Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2010. “Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.” Journal of Statistical Software 33: 1–22.
- Frijters, P., A. E. Clark, C. Krekel, and R. Layard. 2020. “A Happy Choice: Wellbeing as the Goal of Government.” Behavioural Public Policy 4: 126–165.
- Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer.
10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J. F., H. Huang, and S. Wang. 2016. “The Distribution of World Happiness.” World Happiness Report.
- Hoerl, A. E., and R. W. Kennard. 1970. “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems.” Technometrics 12: 55–67.
- James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning With Applications in R. Springer.
10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., and A. Deaton. 2010. “High Income Improves Evaluation of Life but Not Emotional Well-Being.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 16489–16493.
- Killingsworth, M. 2020. “Experienced Well-Being Rises With Income, Even Above $75,000 per Year.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 118: e2016976118.
10.1073/pnas.2016976118 Google Scholar
- Kim, B., R. Khanna, and O. O. Koyejo. 2016. “Examples Are Not Enough, Learn to Criticize! Criticism for Interpretability.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: 2280–2288.
- Layard, R., A. E. Clark, F. Cornaglia, N. Powdthavee, and J. Vernoit. 2014. “What Predicts a Successful Life? A Life-Course Model of Well-Being.” Economic Journal 24: 720–738.
10.1111/ecoj.12170 Google Scholar
- Layard, R., G. Mayraz, and S. Nickell. 2008. “The Marginal Utility of Income.” Journal of Public Economics 92: 1846–1857.
- Lundberg, S. M., and S. I. Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 4768–4777.
- Luttmer, E. 2005. “Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 963–1002.
- Molnar, C. 2019. Interpretable Machine Learning. A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/.
- Murdoch, J., C. Singh, K. Kumbier, R. Abbasi-Asl, and B. Yu. 2020. “Definitions, Methods, and Applications in Interpretable Machine Learning.” PNAS 116: 22071–22080.
10.1073/pnas.1900654116 Google Scholar
- OECD. 2020. How's Life? 2020: Measuring Well-Being. OECD Publishing.
10.1787/9870c393-en Google Scholar
- ONS. 2023. “Review of the UK Measures of National Well-Being.” October 2022 to March 2023. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/articles/reviewoftheukmeasuresofnationalwellbeingoctober2022tomarch2023/2023-07-05.
- Oparina, E., and S. Srisuma. 2022. “Analyzing Subjective Well-Being Data With Misclassification.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 40: 730–743.
- Pedregosa, F., G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, et al. 2011. “Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 12: 2825–2830.
- Samuels, J. 2024. “One-Hot Encoding and Two-Hot Encoding: An Introduction.” Imperial College, Mimeo. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21459.76327.
10.13140/RG.2.2.21459.76327 Google Scholar
- Shapley, L. S. 1953. “ A Value for n-Person Games.” In Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. 2, 307–317. Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400881970-018 Google Scholar
- Štrumbelj, E., and I. Kononenko. 2014. “Explaining Prediction Models and Individual Predictions With Explanatory Variable Contributions.” Knowledge and Information Systems 41: 647–665.
10.1007/s10115-013-0679-x Google Scholar
- Stutzer, A., and B. S. Frey. 2006. “Does Marriage Make People Happy, or Do Happy People Get Married?” Journal of Socio-Economics 35: 326–347.
10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.043 Google Scholar
- Tibshirani, R. 1996. “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology 58: 267–288.
- Tibshirani, R. J. 2013. “The Lasso Problem and Uniqueness.” Electronic Journal of Statistics 7: 1456–1490.
- Winkelmann, L., and R. Winkelmann. 1998. “Why Are the Unemployed So Unhappy? Evidence From Panel Data.” Economica 65: 1–15.
- Zou, H., and T. Hastie. 2005. “Regularization and Variable Selection via the Elastic Net.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology 67: 301–320.