SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
An extended household model of eldercare by children and children-in-law based on Far-Eastern traditions
Shoshana Grossbard,
Corresponding Author
Shoshana Grossbard
San Diego State University, San Diego, California
IZA (Institute of Labor Economics), Bonn, Germany
Correspondence
Department of Economics, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorShoshana Grossbard,
Corresponding Author
Shoshana Grossbard
San Diego State University, San Diego, California
IZA (Institute of Labor Economics), Bonn, Germany
Correspondence
Department of Economics, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFunding Information:
Asian Development Bank Institute.
Abstract
A model of informal caregiving is presented in which decisions are made by extended households including parents and children. An extended household possibly has both a demand and a supply of elder caregiving by children-in-law. A patrilocal version of the model, inspired from traditional Chinese marriage institutions adopted by a number of countries in the Far East, leads to derived demands for caregiving by daughters-in-law and supplies of caregiving by families of daughters. Market equilibrium prices for caregiving by children-in-law are established. These prices then provide incentives to which individual households respond. Payments can be made during, before, or after marriage. The model can throw light on gender differences in marital happiness, differences in the impact of eldercare on the health of in-family caregivers and on their happiness, and East/West and regional differences in caregiving obligations of family members. It also suggests that these geographic differentials may be related to variation in family institutions, including variation in the prevalence of dowry and brideprice. The policy relevance of the model is discussed.
REFERENCES
- Alessie, R., Angelini, V., & Pasini, G. (2014). Is it true love? Altruism versus exchange in time and money transfers. De Economist, 162(2), 193–213.
- Anderson, S. (2007). The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 151–174.
- Arokiasamy, P., Bloom, D., Lee, J., Feeney, K., & Ozolins, M. (2011). Longitudinal aging study in India: Vision, design, implementation, and some early results (PGDA Working Paper No. 82). Cambridge, MA: Program on the Global Demography of Ageing at Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/pgda/working.htm-
- Averett, S. L., Sikor, A., & Argys, L. M. (2015). Intergenerational transfers and caregiving within families. In E. Redmount (Ed.), The economics of the family (Vol. 2). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
- Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–515.
- Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846.
- Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bethmann, D., & Rudolf, R. (2018). Happily ever after? Intrahousehold bargaining and the distribution of utility within marriage. Review of Economics of the Household, 16(2), 347–376.
- Bronfenbrenner, M. (1971). A note on the economics of the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 79(6), 1424–1425.
10.1086/259853 Google Scholar
- Cheung, S. N. S. (1972). The enforcement of property rights in children, and the marriage contract. The Economic Journal, 82(326), 641–657.
- Chiappori, P.-A., Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., & Kanbur, R. (1993). Unitary versus collective models of the household: time to shift the burden of proof? (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2017). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
- Chowdhuri, A. R. (2010). Money and marriage: The practice of dowry and brideprice in rural India. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Dallas, Texas. Retrieved from paa2010.princeton.edu/papers/100225
- Chu, C. Y., & Yu, R.-R. (2010). Understanding Chinese families: A comparative study of Taiwan and Southeast China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Cox, D., & Rank, M. R. (1992). Inter-vivos transfers and intergenerational exchange. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 305–314.
- Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India, and the Republic of Korea (Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 2942). Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2942
10.1080/00220380412331293807 Google Scholar
- Datta, P., Poortinga, Y. H., & Marcoen, A. (2003). Parent care by Indian and Belgian caregivers in their roles of daughter/daughter-in-Law. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(6), 736–749.
- Du, Q., & Wei, S.-J. (2013). A theory of competitive saving motive. Journal of International Economics, 91(2), 275–289.
- Fisher, K., & Robinson, J. (2011). Daily life in 23 countries. Social Indicators Research, 101(2), 295–304.
- Grossbard, A. (1976). An economic analysis of polygamy: The case of Maiduguri. Current Anthropology, 17(4), 701–707.
- Grossbard, S. (2010). How “Chicagoan” are Gary Becker's economic models of marriage? Journal of History of Economic Thought, 32(3), 377–395.
- Grossbard, S. (2011). Independent individual decision-makers in household models and the New Home Economics. In J. A. Molina (Ed.), Household economic behaviors. New York: Springer.
10.1007/978-1-4419-9431-8_2 Google Scholar
- Grossbard, S. (2014). A note on altruism and caregiving in the family: Do prices matter? Review of Economics of the Household, 12(3), 487–492.
- Grossbard, S. (2015). The marriage motive: A price theory of marriage. How marriage markets affect employment, consumption and savings. New York: Springer.
10.1007/978-1-4614-1623-4 Google Scholar
- Grossbard, S. (2016a). Marriage and marriage markets (IZA Discussion Paper No. 10312). Bonn, Germany: IZA (Institute of Labour Economics).
- Grossbard, S. (2016b). Polygamy and the regulation of marriage markets. In J. Bennion & L. Fishbayn Joffe (Eds.), The polygamy question. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
- Grossbard, S. (2018). Marriage and Marriage Markets. In S. L. Averett, L. M. Argys & S. D. Hoffman (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on the Economics of Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Grossbard, S., & Amuedo-Dorantes, C. (2007). Marriage markets and women's labor force participation. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(3), 249–278.
10.1007/s11150-007-9014-1 Google Scholar
- Grossbard, S., & Pereira, A. M. (2010). Will women save more than men? A theoretical model of savings and marriage (CESifo Working Paper No. 3146). Munich, Germany: CESifo Group.
- Grossbard-Shechtman, A. (1984). A theory of allocation of time in markets for labor and marriage. Economic Journal, 94(4), 863–882.
- Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (1993). On the economics of marriage: a theory of marriage, labor, and divorce. Boulder (Co): Westview Press.
- Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (2001). The New Home Economics at Columbia and Chicago. Feminist Economics, 7(3), 103–130.
- Grossbard-Shechtman, S. A., & Granger, C. W. (1998). Travail des femmes et mariage du baby-boom au baby-bust (Women's jobs and marriage, baby-boom versus baby-bust) [in French]. Population, 53(4), 731–752.
- Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223–255.
- Horioka, C. Y. (2014). Are Americans and Indians more altruistic than the Japanese and Chinese? Evidence from a new international survey of bequest plans. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(3), 411–437.
- Horioka, C. Y., & Terada-Hagiwara, A. (2017). The Impact of sex ratios before marriage on household saving in two Asian countries: The competitive saving motive revisited. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(3), 739–757.
- Kureishi, W., & Wakabayashi, M. (2013). What motivates single women to save? The case of Japan. Review of Economics of the Household, 11(4), 681–704.
- Lemennicier, B. (1988). Le marche du mariage et de la famille (The march of marriage and family) [in French]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Lopez Anuarbe, M. (2013). Intergenerational transfers in long term care. Review of Economics of the Household, 11(2), 235–258.
- McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22(2), 333–349.
- Mincer, J. (1963). Market prices, opportunity costs, and income effects. In C. Christ (Ed.), Measurement in economics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2013). A comprehensive survey of living conditions, Japan (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
- National Alliance for Caregiving. (2015). Caregiving in the U.S. 2015—focused look at caregivers of adults age 50+ (Research Report). Retrieved from http://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2015_CaregivingintheUS_Care-Recipients-Over-50_WEB.pdf
- Niimi, Y. (2016). The “costs” of informal care: An analysis of the impact of elderly care on caregivers’ subjective well-being in Japan. Review of Economics of the Household, 14(4), 779–810.
- Nivakoski, S. (2015). The exchange motive in intergenerational transfers (Working Paper No. 2015/10). Dublin, Republic of Ireland: University College Dublin Geary Institute.
- Oshio, T. (2014). Mental health among middle-aged and older adults: Evidence from a nationwide panel survey in Japan. The Economic Review, 65(4), 332–344.
- Pollak, R. A. (2003). Gary Becker's contributions to family and household economics. Review of Economics of the Household, 1(1), 111–141.
10.1023/A:1021803615737 Google Scholar
- Rudolf, R., & Kang, S.-J. (2015). Lags and leads in life satisfaction in Korea: When gender matters. Feminist Economics, 21, 136–163.
- Sevilla-Sanz, A. (2010). Household division of labor and cross-country differences in household formation rates. Journal of Population Economics, 23(1), 225–249.
- Ugargol, A. P., Hutter, I., James, K. S., & Bailey, A. (2015). Caregiving patterns to older adults in India (Extended Abstract). Annual Meeting of Population Association of America 2015, San Diego.
- Van Houtven, C. H., & Norton, E. S. (2004). Informal care and health care use of older adults. Journal of Health Economics, 23(6), 1159–1180.
- Wakabayashi, M., & Kureishi, W. (2016). Impacts of informal caregiving on caregivers’ health and life satisfaction. Paper presented at the ADBI–AGI workshop on aging in Asia, Kitakyushu, Japan, November.
- Wei, S.-J., & Zhang, X. (2011). The competitive savings motive: Evidence from rising sex ratios and savings rates in China. Journal of Political Economy, 119(3), 511–564.
- Zhu, C., Moore, M., & Clipp, E. (2003). Dementia problem behavior and the production of informal caregiving services. Review of Economics of the Household, 1(1–2), 77–110.
