Volume 85, Issue 4 pp. 989-1003
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Body-worn cameras, police arrests, and bureaucratic discretion: A large-scale causal analysis across the United States

Andrea M. Headley

Corresponding Author

Andrea M. Headley

McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

Correspondence

Andrea M. Headley, McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel B. Baker

Daniel B. Baker

Department of Government and Justice Studies, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Inkyu Kang

Inkyu Kang

School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 January 2025
Citations: 2

Andrea M. Headley, Daniel B. Baker and Inkyu Kang are co-first authors with equal contribution.

Abstract

Drawing on the literature on bureaucratic discretion, this study conducts a large-scale, nationwide causal analysis of the effects of body-worn cameras (BWC) in the United States (US). It employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DiD) approach using 12 years of panel data (2008–2019) covering 697 local police agencies. The findings indicate that BWC adoption had no significant effect on White arrests but led to an approximately 5.5% decrease in Black arrests. Importantly, the reduction in Black arrests was concentrated in alcohol-related cases, which involve considerable officer discretion, but did not extend to cases categorized as more serious public safety threats, such as violent or property crimes, where officer discretion may be more limited. Meanwhile, there was also a 7.7% increase in White arrests related to weapon offenses, aligning with prior studies that suggest BWCs may serve as a tool for evidence collection. Our findings provide insight into how BWCs have influenced police arrests in the US, advancing beyond previous single-case evaluations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.