Volume 29, Issue 1 e70033
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

CMV Reactivation Following Allogeneic Transplantation in Children From a High-Seroprevalence Population: A Single-Center Experience in Colombia

Andres Arias

Andres Arias

Hospital Universitario Erasmo Meoz, Cúcuta, Colombia

Search for more papers by this author
Natalia Builes

Corresponding Author

Natalia Builes

Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia

Correspondence:

Natalia Builes ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Laura Niño-Serna

Laura Niño-Serna

Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia

Search for more papers by this author
Alejandro Diaz

Alejandro Diaz

Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia

Hospital General de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia

Search for more papers by this author
Beatriz H. Aristizabal

Beatriz H. Aristizabal

UNIGEM, Unidad de Investigación Genética Molecular, Medellín, Colombia

Search for more papers by this author
Monica Trujillo

Monica Trujillo

Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 January 2025
Citations: 2

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a frequent complication among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Data regarding CMV reactivation in children in underdeveloped countries is scarce. This is especially notable considering the increasing utilization of haploidentical-related HSCT with the post-transplant cyclophosphamide platform. This study aimed to describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, and evolution of children with CMV reactivation after HSCT and the possible impact of unmanipulated stem cells with PTCy for GvHD prophylaxis.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from January 2012 to June 2022. Baseline characteristics and the clinical course were described. Duration of treatment, initial viral load, and time to clearance of DNAemia by type of transplant were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 20.0.

Results

One hundred sixty-six children were included. Among them, 87% of recipients and 88% of donors were CMV positive. The cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus DNAemia was 28% at 100 days post-transplantation. There were no differences between different donor types. Overall survival at 1 year was 60%, and non-relapse mortality was observed in 28%. CMV reactivation did not appear to negatively impact 1-year overall survival (OS).

Conclusions

Our study found no differences in CMV reactivation rates, treatment duration, viral clearance times, co-infections, or 1-year overall survival across different HSCT donor types. Studies are needed to establish more precise criteria for monitoring recipients, particularly in regions where unmanipulated stem cells with PTCy for GvHD prophylaxis are increasing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.