Comparison of cystatin C, creatinine, and iohexol clearance in pediatric liver transplantation—a retrospective cohort study

Impaired renal function after pediatric (LT) is a recognized problem. Accurate monitoring of (GFR) is imperative to detect declining renal function. GFR can be estimated via s-creatinine and/or p-cystatin C or measured by inulin and or/iohexol clearances. We retrospectively compared eGFRcrea and eGFRcyst, to mGFRiohex after LT. Data from 91 children with 312 concomitant measurements of s-creatinine, p-cystatin C, and iohexol clearance, obtained between 2007 and 2015, were analyzed. eGFR was calculated by using the p-cystatin C-based CAPA and CKD-EPI formulas, and the s-creatinine-based Schwartz-LYON, FAS, revised Schwartz and MDRD formulas. Also, the arithmetic means of cystatin C-based and creatinine-based equations were used. Every calculated eGFR was compared to mGFRiohex in statistical correlation, accuracy, precision, bias, and misclassifications. Among the different equations, p-cystatin C-based formulas (CAPA and CKD-EPI) as well as the s-creatinine-based Schwartz-LYON formula showed the most correct estimates regarding accuracy (84–87.5%), bias (0.19–4.0 ml/min/1.73 m²), and misclassification rate (24.7–25%). In patients with renal function <75 ml/min/1.73 m², cystatin C-based formulas were significantly more accurate and less biased than creatinine-based formulas. In conclusion, S-creatinine could be used in a clinical setting on a regular basis in liver transplanted pediatric patients, with reliable results, if eGFR is calculated by the Schwartz-LYON formula. When suspected renal dysfunction, cystatin C-based eGFR should be calculated, since it gives more accurate and less biased estimates than creatinine-based eGFR, and should be confirmed by mGFR (iohexol).