Volume 24, Issue 7 e13800
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Time to second kidney transplantation in young adults after failed pediatric kidney transplant

Korntip Phonphok

Korntip Phonphok

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Piyavadee Homkrailas

Piyavadee Homkrailas

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Tin Duong

Tin Duong

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sunee Panombualert

Sunee Panombualert

Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Yong W. Cho

Yong W. Cho

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Marcelo Sampaio

Marcelo Sampaio

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Erik L. Lum

Erik L. Lum

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Suphamai Bunnapradist

Corresponding Author

Suphamai Bunnapradist

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Correspondence

Suphamai Bunnapradist, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 1015 Gayley Ave Ste.220, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2020
Citations: 6

Abstract

Background

Under the current kidney allocation system, pediatric candidates listed prior to age 18 receive priority for high-quality deceased donor organs. This has resulted in a decline in living donor transplantation in pediatrics, despite superior outcomes of living donor transplantation. Due to a young age at transplantation, most pediatric kidney transplant recipients require re-transplantation. The effects of a previously failed deceased donor vs a previously failed living donor on re-transplant candidates are unknown.

Methods

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we examined 2772 re-transplant recipients aged 18-30 years at time of relisting for second KT from 2000 to 2018 with history of prior pediatric KT (age ≤ 18 years).

Results

PFLDKT recipients compared to those with PFDDKT had shorter median waiting times and dialysis time regardless of their second donor type (14.0 vs 20.3 months, and 19.1 vs 34.5 months, respectively). PFLDKT recipients had higher re-transplant rates (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.27, and adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.15 when calculating from time of relisting and time of returning to dialysis, respectively). PFDDKT recipients were more likely to have higher median PRA levels (90% vs 73%).

Conclusions

Re-transplant candidates who received a previous deceased donor as a child had a higher level of sensitization, longer waiting time, and dialysis exposure compared to those with PFLDKT. Among primary pediatric kidney transplant candidates, consideration should be considered for living donor transplantation, despite the priority for deceased donor organs, to avoid increased sensitization and longer waiting times for with re-transplantation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.