Volume 20, Issue 3 pp. 443-448
Original Article

Intravenous busulfan dose individualization – impact of modeling approach on dose recommendation

Susan M. Abdel-Rahman

Corresponding Author

Susan M. Abdel-Rahman

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA

Susan M. Abdel-Rahman, Section of Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy-Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA

Tel.: +1 816 234 3059

Fax: +1 816 855 1958

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
K. Leigh Casey

K. Leigh Casey

Department of Pharmacy, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Uttam Garg

Uttam Garg

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jignesh Dalal

Jignesh Dalal

Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 February 2016
Citations: 9

Abstract

TDM is intended to limit unintended consequences of drugs with narrow therapeutic indices. However, the application of different sampling strategies and pharmacokinetic approaches results in different dosing recommendations and ostensibly different outcomes. TDM approaches for intravenous busulfan dose individualization employ compartmental or non-compartmental modeling with anywhere from three to seven drug levels. This investigation was designed to examine the differences in dosing recommendations that arise in children (n = 30) when five different TDM approaches were employed. Significant differences in recommended doses between modeling strategies were observed. More importantly, the recommendations were discordant in 13 cases with at least one model recommending a dose adjustment in the opposite direction relative to the remaining models. The mathematical differences introduced by the application of different TDM approaches are not purely academic. Unification of busulfan TDM approaches should be considered to mitigate inconsistently applied dose adjustment, and facilitate comparisons of outcome, between clinical centers.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.