Volume 25, Issue 7 e70061
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Pregabalin for the Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active, and Placebo-Controlled Trial

Shilpi Dhawan

Corresponding Author

Shilpi Dhawan

Clinical Development, Adalvo Limited, Bengaluru, India

Correspondence:

Shilpi Dhawan ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Amol Bongirwar

Amol Bongirwar

Clinical Development, Adalvo Limited, Bengaluru, India

Search for more papers by this author
Marta Muñoz-Tudurí

Marta Muñoz-Tudurí

BD&Innovation Department, Laboratorios Gebro Pharma S.A., Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Aman Khanna Romesh

Aman Khanna Romesh

Aman Hospital and Research Center, Vadodara, India

Search for more papers by this author
Prakash H. Kurmi

Prakash H. Kurmi

Shivam Hospital, Ahmedabad, India

Search for more papers by this author
Rahul Tulshidas Jankar

Rahul Tulshidas Jankar

Asian Institute of Medical Science, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 July 2025

Funding: This study was funded by Adalvo Limited.

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily prolonged release (PR) pregabalin formulation to pregabalin immediate release (IR) in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

Patients and Methods

This was a non-inferiority, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multiple-dose, multicenter, active and placebo controlled, three-arm, parallel study. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive pregabalin PR tablet, pregabalin IR hard capsule (Lyrica) or placebo at an optimized dose based on individual subject's response and tolerability for 13 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the mean weekly pain score from baseline to end of treatment.

Results

Overall, 453 patients were randomized. In the per protocol (PP) analysis set, the least square mean (LSM) difference between test and reference treatment for the change in weekly pain score from baseline to end of treatment was 0.06 (95% CI: −0.28, 0.41, p = 0.7121), indicating that pregabalin PR was non-inferior to pregabalin IR. In the Full Analysis Set (FAS), the LSM of change in mean weekly pain score from baseline to end of treatment for test, reference, and placebo groups were −3.43, −3.49, and −3.04, respectively. Test and reference products were superior to placebo (p = 0.0158 and 0.0047, respectively).

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of pregabalin PR was comparable to pregabalin IR for the treatment of pain in patients with DPN.

Conflicts of Interest

Shilpi Dhawan and Amol Bongirwar are employees of Adalvo Limited. Marta Muñoz-Tudurí is an employee of Laboratorios Gebro Pharma, S.A. (Spain).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.