Volume 25, Issue 7 e70060
REVIEW

Gabapentinoids for Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Rafael Batista João

Corresponding Author

Rafael Batista João

Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Goiânia Neurological Institute, Goiânia, GO, Brazil

Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, São Vicente de Paulo Charity Hospital, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil

Correspondence:

Rafael Batista João ([email protected]; [email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Jilly Octoria Tagore Chan

Jilly Octoria Tagore Chan

Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Depok, WJ, Indonesia

Search for more papers by this author
Ewen Shengyao Huang

Ewen Shengyao Huang

School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Genesis Pamela Mora Rosas

Genesis Pamela Mora Rosas

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador

Search for more papers by this author
Aníbal Valencia Vasquez

Aníbal Valencia Vasquez

Department of Neuroscience, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia

Search for more papers by this author
Sanjana Thota

Sanjana Thota

Department of Internal Medicine, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Telangana, India

Search for more papers by this author
Julyana Medeiros Dantas

Julyana Medeiros Dantas

Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 July 2025

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

ABSTRACT

Background and Aim

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition frequently associated with chronic symptoms such as central neuropathic pain (CNP) and its related complications. Gabapentinoids are often used in the treatment of post-SCI CNP; however, the optimal management of this condition is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gabapentinoids compared with placebo in post-SCI patients affected by CNP.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin, or mirogabalin) with placebo in post-SCI patients experiencing CNP. We calculated mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pain was measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale.

Results

We included 5 RCTs comprising 682 patients. The mean age was 50.2 years, and 83.8% were male. When compared with placebo, patients treated with gabapentinoids experienced a significant decrease in average daily pain (MD −1.75; 95% CI: −3.23 to −0.28; p = 0.02) and pain-related sleep interference (MD −0.99; 95% CI: −1.38 to −0.60; p < 0.001). Additionally, there were higher proportions of individuals with pain intensity relief ≥ 50% (RR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.25; p < 0.001) and with at least some perceived improvement on the clinical global impression scale (RR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.18, p < 0.001) in the gabapentinoids group compared to the placebo group. However, treatment with gabapentinoids was associated with a significantly increased risk of blurred vision (RR 8.55; 95% CI: 1.53 to 47.7; p = 0.02), somnolence (RR 3.77; 95% CI: 2.44 to 5.84; p < 0.001), peripheral edema (RR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.99; p < 0.01), and dizziness (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.67 to 4.78; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating patients with CNP following SCI, gabapentinoids were associated with significant improvements in pain and pain-related sleep interference compared with placebo. Nonetheless, gabapentinoids significantly increased the risk of adverse events.

Disclosure

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.