Volume 31, Issue 1 pp. 92-102
EDUCATIONAL REVIEW

The “Difficult Learner” in anesthesiology: Challenges, pitfalls, and recommendations

Rebecca D. Margolis

Corresponding Author

Rebecca D. Margolis

Department of Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

Correspondence

Rebecca D. Margolis, Department of Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 4650 Sunset Blvd MS #3, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Cindy M. Ku

Cindy M. Ku

Department of Anesthesiology, Queens Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 October 2020
Citations: 3
Section Editor: Prof Francis Veyckemans

Abstract

Struggling learners often require interventions that are time-consuming and emotionally exhausting for both the trainee and faculty. Numerous barriers, including lack of resources, faculty development, and fear of legal retribution, can impede medical educators from developing and implementing robust remediation plans. Despite the large volume of literature citing professionalism education and the “hidden curriculum” as problem areas in medical education, frontline educators lack practical tools and empowerment to address unprofessionalism in trainees. The paucity of resources in this arena has led to decreased job satisfaction, increased burnout, and an exodus from academic medicine. Department leadership acknowledgment and investment in training faculty on remediation strategies for learners in difficulty and providing tools to meet these challenging job demands will improve faculty's job satisfaction and overall well-being. The authors review salient literature and methodology for diagnosing learners in difficulty, with focus on a high-yield, pragmatic approach that can be taken by medical training programs, including those that lack a robust medical education infrastructure.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.