Volume 28, Issue 8 pp. 703-709
RESEARCH REPORT

Dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in pediatric patients: A prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial for the comparison of ultrasound-guided vs landmark technique

An Teunkens

Corresponding Author

An Teunkens

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Correspondence

Dr An Teunkens, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Marc Van de Velde

Marc Van de Velde

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Kristien Vermeulen

Kristien Vermeulen

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Philippe Van Loon

Philippe Van Loon

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Guy Bogaert

Guy Bogaert

Department of Urology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Steffen Fieuws

Steffen Fieuws

I-Biostat, KU Leuven- University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Steffen Rex

Steffen Rex

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2018
Citations: 22
Section Editor: Adrian Bosenberg
Trial registry number: EUDRACT 2012-001217-16

Summary

Background and aims

Circumcision is a frequently performed procedure in day case pediatric surgery. Dorsal penile nerve block has proven its effectiveness for the management of acute postoperative pain after circumcision. We investigated if the ultrasound-guided placement of a dorsal penile nerve block could reduce opioid requirement as compared to a landmark-based technique.

Methods

Three hundred and ten prepubertal children, aged between 52 weeks postconception and 11 years, were included in this prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial and received either a landmark- or an ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block, using a caudal needle and injecting 0.1 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.5% bilaterally. A single, experienced investigator performed all blocks. The primary endpoint was the number of patients in need of piritramide postoperatively as triggered by the Objective Pain Scale. Secondary outcome parameters included the cumulative dose of postoperatively administered opioids, the requirement to administer fentanyl intraoperatively, the need for paracetamol and ibuprofen during the first 24 postoperative hours, postoperative pain scores, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, the anesthesia induction time, and the time to discharge.

Results

The proportion of patients requiring postoperative piritramide did not differ significantly between both groups (Landmark: 38% vs Ultrasound: 47%, with a difference in proportion between both conditions (95% CI): 0.09 (0.2 to 0.02); P = .135). In addition, the cumulative doses of postoperative piritramide and intraoperative fentanyl, the postoperative need for paracetamol or ibuprofen, pain scores, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the time to discharge were not different either. However, the anesthesia induction time was significantly longer in the ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block (median time [IQR]: Landmark: 11[9; 13] min vs Ultrasound: 13[11; 15] min, P < .001).

Conclusion

Compared with the landmark-guided, the ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block did not reduce the need for postoperative analgesia after circumcision in children, but was associated with an increase in the procedural time.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.