Volume 25, Issue 9 pp. 936-942
Original Article

Nares-to-carina distance in children: does a ‘modified Morgan formula’ give useful guidance during nasal intubation?

Agnes I. Hunyady

Corresponding Author

Agnes I. Hunyady

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

Correspondence

Dr. Agnes. I. Hunyady, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Randolph K. Otto

Randolph K. Otto

Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alexis Christensen

Alexis Christensen

Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Christer Jonmarker

Christer Jonmarker

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 May 2015
Citations: 6

Summary

Background

Knowledge of the normal nares-to-carina (NC) distance might prevent accidental bronchial intubation and be helpful when designing preformed endotracheal tubes (ETT).

Objective

The aim was to measure NC distance and to examine whether a height/length-based ‘modified Morgan formula’ would give useful guidance for nasotracheal ETT depth positioning.

Methods

Two groups were studied. A younger group consisted of nasally intubated postoperative patients. In these, NC distance was obtained as the sum of ETT length and the distance from the ETT tip to the carina, as measured from an anteroposterior chest X-ray. An older group consisted of children who had undergone computerized tomography (CT) examination including head, neck, and chest. In these, NC was measured directly from the CT image. The modified Morgan formula was derived from the NC vs height/length relationship.

Results

Nares-to-carina distance was best predicted by a linear equation based on patient height. The equation in the younger group (1 day–8 years, n = 57) was: NC (cm) = 0.14 × height + 5.8, R2 = 0.90, and in the older group (2.1–20 years, n = 45): NC (cm) = 0.15 × height + 3.4, R2 = 0.93. The equation for the groups combined (n = 102) was: NC (cm) = 0.14 × height + 6.2, R2 = 0.97. Based on the latter equation, a modified Morgan formula was identified as: ETT position at nares in cm = 0.12 × height + 5. If the ETT had been placed as calculated by this formula, the ETT tip would have been at 85 + 5% (mean ± sd) of NC distance, and the ETT tip-to-carina distance would have been 3.1 ± 1.1 cm (range 0–6.6). Bronchial intubation would not have occurred in any child, but a comparison to tracheal length measurements indicates that ETT tip position could be too proximal in some children.

Conclusion

The study confirms previous reports: NC distance can be well predicted from height/length. A modified Morgan formula might decrease the risk for accidental endobronchial intubation in infants and children, but ETT position need to be confirmed by auscultation or other verification.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.