Volume 26, Issue 2 e13855
REVIEW

Longer-term effects of intermittent fasting on body composition and cardiometabolic health in adults with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mousa Khalafi

Corresponding Author

Mousa Khalafi

Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

Correspondence

Mousa Khalafi, Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Aref Habibi Maleki

Aref Habibi Maleki

Department of Exercise Physiology and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Search for more papers by this author
Mahsa Ehsanifar

Mahsa Ehsanifar

Department of Exercise Physiology and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Search for more papers by this author
Michael E. Symonds

Michael E. Symonds

Centre for Perinatal Research, Academic Unit of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sara K. Rosenkranz

Sara K. Rosenkranz

Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 November 2024
Citations: 6

Funding information: This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

Summary

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of long-term intermittent fasting (IF) on body composition and cardiometabolic health in adults with overweight and obesity. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 2024 to identify original randomized trials that investigated the effects of IF versus either a control diet (CON) and/or continuous caloric restriction (CR). Participants were adults with overweight and obesity and intervention durations were ≥ 6 months. Overall, a total of 24 studies involving 2032 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with CON, IF significantly reduced body weight [WMD: −2.84 kg], BMI [WMD: −1.41 kg.m2], fat mass [WMD: −3.06 kg], fat-free mass [WMD: −0.81 kg], waist circumference [WMD: −3.85 cm], visceral fat [SMD: −0.37], fasting glucose [WMD: −0.14 mmol/l], triglycerides [WMD: −0.12 mmol/l], and diastolic blood pressure [WMD: −2.24 mmHg]. Conversely, IF significantly increased high-density lipoproteins [WMD: 0.04 mmol/l] when compared with CON, but had no effects on insulin, hemoglobin A1c%, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, or systolic blood pressure. Compared with CR, IF significantly reduced fat mass [WMD: −0.70 kg], body fat percentage [WMD: −0.59%], and DBP [WMD: −0.91 mmHg], and increased HDL [WMD: 0.03 mmol/l], with no other significant effects. Subgroup analyses showed that the mode of IF and intervention duration were the primary moderators of IF effects on the markers. In adults with overweight or obesity, IF and CR are comparably effective for reducing body weight and adiposity, as well as for improving cardiometabolic health markers.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.