Volume 57, Issue 5 pp. 905-919
CONCEPT ANALYSIS

A simultaneous concept analysis of resilience, coping, posttraumatic growth, and thriving

Jessamyn Bowling PhD, MPH

Jessamyn Bowling PhD, MPH

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Chloe Vercruysse MBA

Corresponding Author

Chloe Vercruysse MBA

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Correspondence Chloe Vercruysse, Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, University City Blvd., 428c, Charlotte, NC 28223, 9201, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Lisa M. Krinner PhD, MSc

Lisa M. Krinner PhD, MSc

Department of Social Medicine, Center for Health Equity Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Taryn Greene PhD, MA

Taryn Greene PhD, MA

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Faustina Bello-Ogunu MSN, RN, PMHNP-BC

Faustina Bello-Ogunu MSN, RN, PMHNP-BC

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Caitlan Webster MA, MPH

Caitlan Webster MA, MPH

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 May 2022
Citations: 4

Abstract

Background

Research has shifted in recent decades from a focus on negative effects of adversity, trauma, and stress to protective factors and positive outcomes. Resilience and related concepts (coping, posttraumatic growth, thriving, and preparedness) reflect this shift. However, the current state of literature reflects conceptualization challenges in relation to these terms, which blur their differentiation.

Aim

We aim to examine how resilience and related terms are conceptualized in health-related literature.

Design

We used a simultaneous concept analysis to independently explore and further inform the conceptual development of resilience, coping, PTG, and thriving. Data source: We searched PsycINFO and PubMed for literature between 1999 and 2019 for each of our concepts.

Review Methods

For each of these concepts, we propose a definition, antecedents, attributes, an example, consequences, and related concepts. Next, we concurrently examined the concepts, compared and contrasted findings across them, and clarified similarities as well as differences between them.

Results

Many concepts' definitions lack specificity, clear boundaries, and consistency across the literature. Resilience literature fails to differentiate between attributes and antecedents of resilience. There was overlap regarding conceptualization between resilience and coping, and resilience and thriving.

Conclusions

Several concepts' definitional literature diverged between a return to baseline functioning and surpassing baseline.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data will be made available upon reasonable request to the authors.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.