Volume 48, Issue 4 pp. 250-259
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Antiparasitic Collars: Concentration Levels of Imidacloprid and Flumethrin in Dog Fur Suggest Low Toxicity Risks for Adult Humans

Margaux Buisson

Margaux Buisson

Clinique de la Tivolliere, Voreppe, France

Search for more papers by this author
Laurine Dumas

Laurine Dumas

Doran International, Toussieu, France

Search for more papers by this author
Célia Gouffran

Célia Gouffran

Doran International, Toussieu, France

Search for more papers by this author
Eloïse C. Déaux

Eloïse C. Déaux

Argos, Chevagnes, France

Search for more papers by this author
Laurent Rougier

Laurent Rougier

Clinique de la Tivolliere, Voreppe, France

No Ledge Research, Voreppe, France

Search for more papers by this author
Sylvia Masson

Corresponding Author

Sylvia Masson

Clinique de la Tivolliere, Voreppe, France

No Ledge Research, Voreppe, France

Correspondence:

Sylvia Masson ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 March 2025

Funding: This work was supported by Clinique de la Tivolliere. Doran International.

ABSTRACT

Seresto by Elanco (formerly Bayer Animal Health) is a collar for cats and dogs that provides long-lasting antiparasitic protection through the gradual release of imidacloprid and flumethrin onto the animal's skin. Although the EPA has deemed Seresto safe, their assessment is based on laboratory data, which may not fully reflect real-world exposure. Furthermore, recent reports of over 900 adverse human health events between 2012 and 2022 underscore the need for further safety investigations. We measured these chemicals' concentrations from the fur of eight dogs over 9 months to evaluate how daily interactions with pets could expose humans to toxic levels. Flumethrin was mostly undetectable, and imidacloprid levels were well below the toxicity threshold, suggesting low risks. However, factors like cumulative exposure and individual characteristics warrant consideration. Concentration levels were highest right after collar application, potentially reaching up to 11.6% of an 8 kg child's acceptable daily intake. We recommend limiting prolonged contact with pets, especially for young children, in the first 48 h post-application. We detected residual imidacloprid prior to collar application and 1 month after removal, raising questions as to the potential contamination risks that roaming pets could pose to ecosystems, given the known environmental impacts of these chemicals.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information—S1 of this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.